0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Re: Proof it was Michael at the 02
March 28, 2010, 10:58:03 AM
I like the way people dare to say that we as fans, can't see things clearly because our "emotional barriers", yet you deny the facts exposed in this thread saying "he looks nothing like Michael, the guy freak me out"... Is that the best you have got? Really?.

Please, instead being arrogant laughing at members, and assuming "we are not learning anything", would you mind come up with one good proof or explanation that support your statements?. Just one. "He doesn't look like Michael" is not working, that's not enough, and you know it.

Oh, and this thread doesn't proof anything, but a whole thread about trash cans (just to mention one) does it?  :roll: ...

The proofs are out there: accept them, or stay in denial. It's up to you.

Peace.
Last Edit: March 28, 2010, 01:43:09 PM by mjj29081958
friendly
0
funny
0
informative
0
agree
0
disagree
0
pwnt
0
like
0
dislike
0
late
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
"Won't you just let me be?..."

mykidsmum

  • Guest
Re: Proof it was Michael at the 02
March 28, 2010, 01:33:31 PM
Quote
mykidsmum wrote:
You and Souza are the ones using the excuse that it wasn't MJ because MJ wouldn't "act like that" or "look like that" You are the ones basing your opinion on past "PR persona."

Quote from: "~Souza~"
NEVER EVER, PERIOD. It's time you start reading what we write.
Quote from: "~Souza~"
Quote from: "mykidsmum"
Why is believing MJ was not at the announcement of his own concerts too difficult to believe?  


Because O2 dude DOES NOT LOOK LIKE MICHAEL JACKSON....
I do read what you write and this IS what you said....

Sometimes when people have a theory, they only seek and see information that fits and does not DIS-prove their theory.  Often they are unable or UNWILLING to see information that goes against what they are looking for.  The PROOF could be staring them in the face, but if it does not go along with what they are trying to prove, they will avoid, not see, deny it and project their own blindness onto others and accuse others of not seeing the bigger picture.  Since I have no big theory I am trying to "wake up" the world to, it's not me...don't worry, this happens in scientific research and criminal investigations all the time...scientific biased.
Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest
friendly
0
funny
0
informative
0
agree
0
disagree
0
pwnt
0
like
0
dislike
0
late
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

*Mo*

  • Guest
Re: Proof it was Michael at the 02
March 28, 2010, 02:47:54 PM
Quote from: "mykidsmum"
Quote
mykidsmum wrote:
You and Souza are the ones using the excuse that it wasn't MJ because MJ wouldn't "act like that" or "look like that" You are the ones basing your opinion on past "PR persona."

Quote from: "~Souza~"
NEVER EVER, PERIOD. It's time you start reading what we write.

For cryin' out loud: I am the one who wrote that, not Souza!!!



This perfectly proves that you do not READ what we write, and you even changed my nick into Souza's!
Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest
friendly
0
funny
0
informative
0
agree
0
disagree
0
pwnt
0
like
0
dislike
0
late
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

the arabian nights

  • Guest
Re: Proof it was Michael at the 02
March 28, 2010, 02:49:44 PM
divided we rule

there are other battles that need to be fought

is this so important

can we agree to disagree

or are we loving it!
Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest
friendly
0
funny
0
informative
0
agree
0
disagree
0
pwnt
0
like
0
dislike
0
late
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

*Mo*

  • Guest
Re: Proof it was Michael at the 02
March 28, 2010, 03:08:16 PM
Quote from: "the arabian nights"
divided we rule

there are other battles that need to be fought

is this so important

can we agree to disagree

or are we loving it!

As far as I'm concerned there's no fight, but I do not like snipers...
Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest
friendly
0
funny
0
informative
0
agree
0
disagree
0
pwnt
0
like
0
dislike
0
late
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

*

~Souza~

Re: Proof it was Michael at the 02
March 28, 2010, 03:28:14 PM
Interesting to see that everyone can be bashed according to some:

Kenny Ortega
Jermaine
La Toya
Karen Faye
etc.

But nothing can be said about Mike (O2 dude). I guess he's the only one with feelings and can be insulted.

This thread is going in circles for pages already and it's time to close this. I guess time will tell.
Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest
friendly
0
funny
0
informative
0
agree
0
disagree
0
pwnt
0
like
0
dislike
0
late
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

 

Related Topics

  Subject / Started by Replies Last post
26 Replies
5556 Views
Last post January 01, 2010, 11:45:11 AM
by mykidsmum
12 Replies
2101 Views
Last post December 29, 2009, 11:36:22 AM
by Eva R
40 Replies
4495 Views
Last post February 09, 2010, 10:11:52 AM
by comsense
177 Replies
13290 Views
Last post February 04, 2010, 01:01:25 AM
by darkchild
46 Replies
4572 Views
Last post March 24, 2010, 01:44:24 PM
by MJJ1982

SimplePortal 2.3.6 © 2008-2014, SimplePortal