0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Re: Proof it was Michael at the 02
March 26, 2010, 05:54:00 PM
THAT IS A SEXY BODY  :D
Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest
friendly
0
funny
0
informative
0
agree
0
disagree
0
pwnt
0
like
0
dislike
0
late
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
   
~[size=150]HEAL THE WORLD[/size]~
i march to the beat of MJs drum

Re: Proof it was Michael at the 02
March 26, 2010, 06:07:12 PM
wow! Great! Love that lol but i also think the last one with 3 arms...weird loll ;) great job
Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest
friendly
0
funny
0
informative
0
agree
0
disagree
0
pwnt
0
like
0
dislike
0
late
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

mykidsmum

  • Guest
Re: Proof it was Michael at the 02
March 26, 2010, 07:38:56 PM
Quote from: "katooooooo"
wow! Great! Love that lol but i also think the last one with 3 arms...weird loll ;) great job
with 3 arms he can give bigger hugs :) :D
thanks everyone for the positve feedback...I really appriciate it.
Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest
friendly
0
funny
0
informative
0
agree
0
disagree
0
pwnt
0
like
0
dislike
0
late
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

*

~Souza~

Re: Proof it was Michael at the 02
March 26, 2010, 07:41:13 PM
Oh my, poor Mike.....
Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest
friendly
0
funny
0
informative
0
agree
0
disagree
0
pwnt
0
like
0
dislike
0
late
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Re: Proof it was Michael at the 02
March 26, 2010, 07:43:50 PM
It is 100% the real Michael Jackson at the O2
Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest
friendly
0
funny
0
informative
0
agree
0
disagree
0
pwnt
0
like
0
dislike
0
late
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

*Mo*

  • Guest
Re: Proof it was Michael at the 02
March 26, 2010, 07:45:18 PM
Oh god......Sorry Mike.....please forgive them for they don't know what they're doing...
Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest
friendly
0
funny
0
informative
0
agree
0
disagree
0
pwnt
0
like
0
dislike
0
late
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

mykidsmum

  • Guest
Re: Proof it was Michael at the 02
March 26, 2010, 08:39:29 PM
Quote from: "*Mo*"
Oh god......Sorry Mike.....please forgive them for they don't know what they're doing...
care to explain?  Could you also tell me what about those pictures is not "Mike"...for people who are not "fans", you both sound like two peas in the fan pod.  Why do you think I or anyone else is in need of MJ's forgiveness.  Why is believing MJ was not at the announcement of his own concerts too difficult to believe?  Better yet, show me anyone in the whole world who could pass for MJ in this type of comparison.  Just one person is all I ask...even among his impersonators there is no one who would fit with the match ups I did.  Tell me, what am I missing?  
Think about this...if you had someone who was a fan of MJ during the Bad era, and for some reason they fell off the face of the Earth for a few years...Suddenly they come back and it's the Invincible era...They turn on MTV hoping to see their lovely MJ...and see....
If MJ had lived for another 30 years, I guarantee, 10 years from now you wouldn't recognise him again...This is who he is and what he is about...He is always growing and changing...He's an artist.  Not to mention his wig maker is in London....
Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest
friendly
0
funny
0
informative
0
agree
0
disagree
0
pwnt
0
like
0
dislike
0
late
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

*

~Souza~

Re: Proof it was Michael at the 02
March 26, 2010, 08:43:56 PM
Quote from: "mykidsmum"
Why is believing MJ was not at the announcement of his own concerts too difficult to believe?  


Because O2 dude DOES NOT LOOK LIKE MICHAEL JACKSON....
Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest
friendly
0
funny
0
informative
0
agree
0
disagree
0
pwnt
0
like
0
dislike
0
late
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

somekindofsign

  • Guest
Re: Proof it was Michael at the 02
March 26, 2010, 08:48:54 PM
That sounded like when a father says
-You can´t do this.
Annd the son asks
-Why?
and the father answers
-Because you can´t do this.

Well, well just because...

FORGIVE ME MICHAEL, I DON´T KNOW WHAT TO THINK.
Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest
friendly
0
funny
0
informative
0
agree
0
disagree
0
pwnt
0
like
0
dislike
0
late
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

*

~Souza~

Re: Proof it was Michael at the 02
March 26, 2010, 09:03:19 PM
Well if O2 dude is Mike, then who is the other guy?



Sorry, but if you still say those two are the same, then I rest my case...
Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest
friendly
0
funny
0
informative
0
agree
0
disagree
0
pwnt
0
like
0
dislike
0
late
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

somekindofsign

  • Guest
Re: Proof it was Michael at the 02
March 26, 2010, 09:19:45 PM
I can´t denny those 2 pics SEEMS different people.
Anyway, I have not decided and still think that the hands are the same.
I think here we´re seeing the same again and again, a vicious circle.
He is - No he isn´t - He is - No he isn´t

I don´t know if we´re gonna get to a conclusion any day.

But I ask myself if you, Souza and Mo, have a special interest to convince (good sense) about this question for any further statement of yours.
Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest
friendly
0
funny
0
informative
0
agree
0
disagree
0
pwnt
0
like
0
dislike
0
late
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

*

~Souza~

Re: Proof it was Michael at the 02
March 26, 2010, 09:49:29 PM
Quote from: "somekindofsign"
I can´t denny those 2 pics SEEMS different people.
Anyway, I have not decided and still think that the hands are the same.
I think here we´re seeing the same again and again, a vicious circle.
He is - No he isn´t - He is - No he isn´t

I don´t know if we´re gonna get to a conclusion any day.

But I ask myself if you, Souza and Mo, have a special interest to convince (good sense) about this question for any further statement of yours.

It is going in circles and it's getting on my nerves now. Comparing bodies now that wear jackets? Come on...

Like I said before: If people can't even see the O2 'lie', how on earth will the be open minded about the message?

And if you believe in this message, how on earth is it possible that people are so desperate to deny the fact that he sends a double on stage at O2?

He is trying to tell people that you shouldn't just believe anything that is written or on TV. He is showing people how easily they are being fooled, by sending out doubles to O2, in This is It. You are being told Michael Jackson was on stage at O2 and TII, you are being told he died, you are being told he was buried, you are being told a load of crap. And the funny fact is that he makes it so obvious, so easy for everyone to see, yet people don't see it or they just don't want to see it.

Also with the doubles in TII. Most of them couldn't even dance. How is it possible that his true fans think that's him? The argument? He aged....

Well I think he is very capable of moving and dancing like himself, yet some of the MJ's on stage were screwing up.

One has long skinny legs, the other one doesn't. One has broad shoulders, the other one doesn't. Just a few examples.

Then you get the question: "How can someone look that much like him, it's impossible." First of all, he clearly doesn't look like Mike that much, his facial structure is off, his smile is off and his manners are off. Besides that, prostetic make-up can do so much, maybe some people didn't watch Ghost? Just look at the color of O2 dude's face, it's all make-up. Lots and lots of make-up. Yet the picture from behind the curtain shows a Michael Jackson with a healthy color on his face. You can't always blame the lighting and the angle.

It's about seeing that you are being lied to. That is what this whole hoax is all about. And I think that if you can't even see that he sent a double to O2 (while being behind the curtain himself) they can't see his message. That is why this is bugging the hell out of me. That and the fact that people say we are disrespectful for saying there were doubles, while I think it's not very nice to claim that some of those doubles in TII were the real deal, even I can dance better than some of them...
Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest
friendly
0
funny
0
informative
0
agree
0
disagree
0
pwnt
0
like
0
dislike
0
late
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

somekindofsign

  • Guest
Re: Proof it was Michael at the 02
March 26, 2010, 09:59:07 PM
By "if you can´t see" you mean me or us?
Because as I said I don´t think he is nor he isn´t.
Which I think is a good open attitude.

Response to this is not necessary.  ;)
And thank you for your answer.
Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest
friendly
0
funny
0
informative
0
agree
0
disagree
0
pwnt
0
like
0
dislike
0
late
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

*

~Souza~

Re: Proof it was Michael at the 02
March 26, 2010, 10:04:21 PM
Quote from: "somekindofsign"
By "if you can´t see" you mean me or us?
Because as I said I don´t think he is nor he isn´t.
Which I think is a good open attitude.

Response to this is not necessary.  ;)
And thank you for your answer.

No, I mean in general...
Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest
friendly
0
funny
0
informative
0
agree
0
disagree
0
pwnt
0
like
0
dislike
0
late
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

*Mo*

  • Guest
Re: Proof it was Michael at the 02
March 26, 2010, 10:08:21 PM
Quote from: "~Souza~"
Quote from: "somekindofsign"
I can´t denny those 2 pics SEEMS different people.
Anyway, I have not decided and still think that the hands are the same.
I think here we´re seeing the same again and again, a vicious circle.
He is - No he isn´t - He is - No he isn´t

I don´t know if we´re gonna get to a conclusion any day.

But I ask myself if you, Souza and Mo, have a special interest to convince (good sense) about this question for any further statement of yours.

It is going in circles and it's getting on my nerves now. Comparing bodies now that wear jackets? Come on...

Like I said before: If people can't even see the O2 'lie', how on earth will the be open minded about the message?

And if you believe in this message, how on earth is it possible that people are so desperate to deny the fact that he sends a double on stage at O2?

He is trying to tell people that you shouldn't just believe anything that is written or on TV. He is showing people how easily they are being fooled, by sending out doubles to O2, in This is It. You are being told Michael Jackson was on stage at O2 and TII, you are being told he died, you are being told he was buried, you are being told a load of crap. And the funny fact is that he makes it so obvious, so easy for everyone to see, yet people don't see it or they just don't want to see it.

Also with the doubles in TII. Most of them couldn't even dance. How is it possible that his true fans think that's him? The argument? He aged....

Well I think he is very capable of moving and dancing like himself, yet some of the MJ's on stage were screwing up.

One has long skinny legs, the other one doesn't. One has broad shoulders, the other one doesn't. Just a few examples.

Then you get the question: "How can someone look that much like him, it's impossible." First of all, he clearly doesn't look like Mike that much, his facial structure is off, his smile is off and his manners are off. Besides that, prostetic make-up can do so much, maybe some people didn't watch Ghost? Just look at the color of O2 dude's face, it's all make-up. Lots and lots of make-up. Yet the picture from behind the curtain shows a Michael Jackson with a healthy color on his face. You can't always blame the lighting and the angle.

It's about seeing that you are being lied to. That is what this whole hoax is all about. And I think that if you can't even see that he sent a double to O2 (while being behind the curtain himself) they can't see his message. That is why this is bugging the hell out of me. That and the fact that people say we are disrespectful for saying there were doubles, while I think it's not very nice to claim that some of those doubles in TII were the real deal, even I can dance better than some of them...

We're on the exact same level, I couldn't have said it any better.  Thanks Souz!
Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest
friendly
0
funny
0
informative
0
agree
0
disagree
0
pwnt
0
like
0
dislike
0
late
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

 

Related Topics

  Subject / Started by Replies Last post
26 Replies
5481 Views
Last post January 01, 2010, 11:45:11 AM
by mykidsmum
12 Replies
2070 Views
Last post December 29, 2009, 11:36:22 AM
by Eva R
40 Replies
4419 Views
Last post February 09, 2010, 10:11:52 AM
by comsense
177 Replies
13094 Views
Last post February 04, 2010, 01:01:25 AM
by darkchild
46 Replies
4498 Views
Last post March 24, 2010, 01:44:24 PM
by MJJ1982

SimplePortal 2.3.6 © 2008-2014, SimplePortal