0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Also would it really be necessary to go into so much detail? Right down to things that would seem unnecessary to make up, such as very mild/minor medical abnormalities that wouldn't have shown up had an autopsy not been performed and would not be needed to convincingly fake a report.
Quote from: "QuirkyDiana"Also would it really be necessary to go into so much detail? Right down to things that would seem unnecessary to make up, such as very mild/minor medical abnormalities that wouldn't have shown up had an autopsy not been performed and would not be needed to convincingly fake a report.That is true but what is also strange is that they would leave out other more obvious details such as the scar on his cheek and lip... Not saying that the report is real or fake but I just don't see the logic many times.
my[KING]"]WHAT DISTURBS ME THE MOST IS THE BLACK TATTOO ON HIS HEAD NOTED IN THE A.R. BECAUSE I CAN CLEARLY SEE THAT TATTOO IN EVERY PICTURE (RECENT) :?
I see what you mean, BUT : I emailed a couple of times to the coroner in LA, and got the answer, that autopsy reports are made public, as soon as the case is closed. Meaning the investigation, sort of closed. Others have emailed too, and basicly got the same answer. I'm not saying the report is real, but there is no mystery in it being public.
Quote from: "Tina K."I see what you mean, BUT : I emailed a couple of times to the coroner in LA, and got the answer, that autopsy reports are made public, as soon as the case is closed. Meaning the investigation, sort of closed. Others have emailed too, and basicly got the same answer. I'm not saying the report is real, but there is no mystery in it being public. Whoa. Thank you for the heads up. California is a scary place. I once had a court order to pick up an autopsy report, and I still had to prove that I was authorized. And, getting the report on the brain was "a whole nother" hoop to jump through. I didn't mind, because the information SHOULD be private. Dang. Michael Jackson thought of everything---including where to play dead!!!!!!!! :roll: :lol: But...it is STILL not him. And the investigation ISN'T over, iS it? so---- HUH?? :?: He is probably enjoying this adventure in some fake person being "fileted " for our hoaxing pleasure. And, it is still yucky. :roll: Someone said it here already: MJ would not want people wasting their lives on unprofitable, unproductive things. It's ok to investigate, but when it takes up huge blocks of your time, either crying over his death, or dissecting an autopsy report that isn't even HIM, for hours, it is defeating his purpose. HAVE we learned anything (from this report)of practical use to this Hoax of his, besides two hours worth of did he or didn't he smoke :? ? I'm not saying DON'T, heck-- I keep coming over, briefly. I am just saying, 'show me the money'. :idea: 8-)
Quote from: "alovesmichael"Quote from: "QuirkyDiana"Also would it really be necessary to go into so much detail? Right down to things that would seem unnecessary to make up, such as very mild/minor medical abnormalities that wouldn't have shown up had an autopsy not been performed and would not be needed to convincingly fake a report.That is true but what is also strange is that they would leave out other more obvious details such as the scar on his cheek and lip... Not saying that the report is real or fake but I just don't see the logic many times.Yes the scar on his cheek, and the pepsi scar is not mentioned either except for a drawing on the back of the head. He had reconstructive surgery on his scalp, underneath the hair there must have been scars visible of the reconstruction.He also broke two bones in his foot, is there any mention of that? Must admit I've only read until page 14 so far, screened the rest.
Started by *Mo* « 1 2 ... 7 8 » Dave Dave
Started by TruthBeTold « 1 2 ... 36 37 » Other Odd Things
Started by looking4truth « 1 2 ... 1088 1089 » Back/Front discussions
Started by *Mo* Pictures & Videos of Michael
Started by badkolo « 1 2 ... 73 74 » The Double Theory