M

The Official Autopsy Report Thread

Started by mykidsmum, February 08, 2010, 09:29:03 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

Sangre

July 30, 2010, 03:38:42 AM #510 Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest

I doubt he smoked. During the trial, MJ was in the hospital with pneumonia. Could that have affected his lungs?

"No one should judge what I\'ve done with my life. Not unless they\'ve been in my shoes every horrible day and every sleepless night." ~ Michael J. (1995)

katy (MJFAN7)

July 30, 2010, 04:55:35 AM #511 Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest

He did NOT smoke.. I can't remember where I saw it but he said the picture was only a joke between his friends. They were making fun of him for being so goodie goodie, so he pretended to smoke.  ;)  :lol:



أملي هو فيكم.

Its her

September 20, 2010, 11:14:06 PM #512 Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest

I see that I never did share what debunks the PDF I read, for ME. But I can quickly tell you now what it is that makes it bogus. It may save you some time investigating, needlessly...

And, I  don't need to debunk EVERYthing to discredit ALL of it. It only takes one fly(knowing what they have on their feets :shock: ) in my drink to throw the entire drink out.

1] :o  In the year 2009, I am confident that NO government agency uses a typewriter  :lol: to produce autopsy forms.

2] :o  Equally convinced that not even a COUNTY government agency would still be using official forms which were last revised in 1995. :lol:

3] :o  The amount of pages (over 50) is suspect. Most ARs are no more than 6 pages---including Tox report and brain pathology report. The individual is dead--they list a couple of main contributing illnesses or injuries, and it really doesn't matter that they had evidences of 40 other illnesses or diseases.:?

4] :o On that subject, just ONE lung disease would have prevented MJ from raising three young children, performing grueling rehearsals for a concert tour, or making the movie, TII, which we all investigated---unless someone doesn't think the star of TII was MJ.  :? A hoaxed death requires a hoaxed report to give people something to do. MOST  :mrgreen:   of the given hoax clues are  ;)  ;) obvious OVERKILL.  8-)  8-)

FIFTY pages of an AR is classic :D  :lol:  :lol:  :P  :P  :P  :P  MJ OVERKILL. As MJ would say, "Is THAT scary for ya, Baby"  :?:  :P  :P  :lol:

5] :o There is information in the autopsy report which is NOT autopsy (findings from a dead body)report, and, at times,  :lol:  reads more like all of these, mixed in: a legal brief, a police report, a coroner's report, and specialist consults which are done on living hospital guests, UPSTAIRS---not in the morgue. Nothing which does not pertain to the dissected body ever appears in, or under the heading, "AR". NOTHING about what was found at the scene, or the condition of the scene would ever be in the AUTOPSY report :!:   :roll:

6] :o ALL catheters, tubes, pic lines, appliances, eyeglasses, hearing aids, dressings, etc., etc., are always removed prior to the trip to the morgue or mortuary. According to the story, MJ's body was "worked on" at the hospital, and probably intubated at one point, while they tried all chemical things to reverse the guy's problems. (Even after a routine surgery which goes amok,  :arrow: someone is assigned the task of removing all possible evidence of hospital :x  liability; drainage hoses, breathing tubes, introvenous lines and even fresh--clean-- catheters.) So, the mere mention of finding these things in a body which had been treated at the hospital makes this report a lie. :roll:

7] I'll combine these two things, for the sake of time: there was NO mention at all of any plastic surgeries or any injuries to his nose---which he reportedly BROKE prior to his very first nose job, and NO mention of --I can't remember---either a broken leg or broken foot, he experienced in the late 90s, I believe (not certain of the year, just certain of the broken bones).

There is more, but...this is QUITE enough, to establish that something is very wrong about this report, and that it is not even from this decade, let alone, in particular, OUR dear  50 year old Michael Jackson, K.O.P..

ONLY Believe...

loyalfan

September 21, 2010, 02:29:57 AM #513 Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest

wow great post..."its her"...


Its her

September 21, 2010, 02:53:42 AM #514 Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest
Quote from: "loyalfan"

wow great post..."its her"...

Thank you! You are too kind. :D
ONLY Believe...

loyalfan

September 21, 2010, 04:02:38 AM #515 Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest

i only say things if i mean it...and its a great post lol      love to you xxxx


ForstAMoon

September 21, 2010, 05:52:31 AM #516 Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest

I have just noticed that there is sth strange as far as odontology is concerned. In my country at least in case of death odontology is very often the identification source and is always quite detailed in description.

This is the section from MJ AR, I was not able to find anything more on this.

And there is this photo of young MJ, from around 1971, so ca.12 yrs old, in theory all of his teeth should have been permanent at this age. It seems one (canine) is missing. I looks like right one, which is number #6.

Any of the tooth loss as well as implants should be listed in AR. There is sth #18 and #19 but anything on #6. They mentioned all-ceramic maxillary teeth but still no word on missing tooth, even after the restoration like crown or implant, lack of teeth is lack of teeth and still should be mentioned.

:?  :?  :?


Datroot

September 21, 2010, 06:15:19 AM #517 Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest

MJ looks younger than 12 in that pic.  It looks like his tooth hasn't yet come through from his missing baby tooth.



I'M A LOVER, NOT A FIGHTER

ForstAMoon

September 21, 2010, 09:02:47 AM #518 Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest
Quote from: "Datroot"

MJ looks younger than 12 in that pic.  It looks like his tooth hasn't yet come through from his missing baby tooth.

that's the description under the photo on getty images page, there are other photos from this session available as well


CC

September 21, 2010, 01:43:34 PM #519 Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest
Quote from: "ForstAMoon"

Quote from: "Datroot"

MJ looks younger than 12 in that pic.  It looks like his tooth hasn't yet come through from his missing baby tooth.

that's the description under the photo on getty images page, there are other photos from this session available as well

If what Souza have in his Theory is true (about the birth date) then MJ in that pictures has 10 years, not even 11... :roll:  could be he was changing his tooth at 10...

and btw, i was searching for Brittany Murphy Autopsy Report to make a comparation but i can´t found it but i found that TMZ laked that AR and found this article where say that MJ AR was fabricated... :?
http://www.associatedcontent.com/articl ... eaked.html

Some men see things as they are and say: WHY?
I dream things that never were and say: WHY NOT?

katy (MJFAN7)

September 21, 2010, 02:11:14 PM #520 Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest

Michael still looks very young in that photo, maybe the baby tooth hasn't came in yet.



أملي هو فيكم.

pepper

September 22, 2010, 12:53:02 AM #521 Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest
Quote from: "CC"

and btw, i was searching for Brittany Murphy Autopsy Report to make a comparation

Here you go -

http://www.autopsyfiles.org/reports/Cel ... report.pdf


loyalfan

September 22, 2010, 03:56:18 AM #522 Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest

can i just ask why a confidential document is available to us..???


jenwren20

September 22, 2010, 05:07:16 AM #523 Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest

ok, i've been reading through both of these autopsy reports (Brittany Murphy's and MJ's) and apart from the look of them something stood out to me.
In Mike's "autopsy" it says there is a 2cm scar on the abdomen in the lower right quadrant. Having recently had my appendix removed, I was thinking this must be the obvious cause but in the rest of the report it has the appendix present.
So, what is this scar from? I was under the impression that even if the appendix wasn't inflamed, once they've opened you up the remove it regardless??

This stuck in my mind since my first read-through months ago, but going over it again now it's just glaringly obvious.

For All Time x x x

paula-c

September 24, 2010, 07:55:31 AM #524 Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest

The stamps are different, the seal is the autopsy of Brittany Murphy is different to seal the autopsy report for Michael. 8-)


Similar topics (5)