0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
No. They never had the tapes of the time in question. Those tapes were always missing.I can't believe I'm the only one that remembers this. The only reason the topic of the tapes exists at all is because in the days right after 6/25/09, LAPD reported that they had the surveillance tapes from Carrolwood of 6/25 except for the hours in question leading up to the 911 call and immediately afterward. The reports stated that either the footage was erased or the cameras were turned off, but either way, the footage was MISSING.It was always missing. The LAPD never had it in the first place, everyone just got all hysterical when Murray's lawyers requested it recently.Why is TMZ running this article with this kind of slant as if they are trying to rewrite history?
Quote from: "bec"No. They never had the tapes of the time in question. Those tapes were always missing.I can't believe I'm the only one that remembers this. The only reason the topic of the tapes exists at all is because in the days right after 6/25/09, LAPD reported that they had the surveillance tapes from Carrolwood of 6/25 except for the hours in question leading up to the 911 call and immediately afterward. The reports stated that either the footage was erased or the cameras were turned off, but either way, the footage was MISSING.It was always missing. The LAPD never had it in the first place, everyone just got all hysterical when Murray's lawyers requested it recently.Why is TMZ running this article with this kind of slant as if they are trying to rewrite history?I remember the same bec, the tapes were missing. I have been searching for an article about it, but I can't seem to find it.This story is BS anyway. if the tapes would have been there, the LAPD would have taken them all, certainly when it's a 50-year-old that died with an IV in his arm/leg/wherever and EMT's who are claiming something was fishy about the time of death etc.
Makes no sense that people can move freely in to the "crime scene" and collect items as La Toya did.My guess: I have the impression that MJ had cameras all over the place for basic security reasons and also in his room, but may be that camera was not monitored by the security team, since I guess that MJ liked his privacy, he may be hold those tapes for review and may be people were not awared of the existance of a camera in that room on the 1st place.How did the tapes reach the police? who gave the tapes?. So many questions.
Wow. Support from Perez Hilton - You are not allowed to view links. Register or LoginPosted: March 16, 2011 at 2:50 pmMichael Jackson Surveillance Footage Erased By The LAPD"This is crazy.Dr. Conrad Murray's lawyers will be going to court on Wednesday to ask the judge to order the LAPD to turn over all the surveillance videos that showed who was going in and out of Michael Jackson's home on the day he died.The problem is only 4 minutes of footage was copied by the LAPD. The rest of it was erased.Oh geez…The LAPD says that they grabbed the footage to get a timeline of when MJ entered his home before he died. Since they didn't know that his case would turn into a homicide investigation, the rest was erased.In fact, the police apparently never even looked at the rest of the surveillance videos so no one knows who entered his home on the day he died.Wow. That seems pretty careless. And also, a little bit shady…Guess Conrad Murray's defense has been hit with another blow."
So, they must have a pretty crappy surveillance system in the house. We have a nanny cam that we installed a few weeks ago and it was only $300.00, but on ours it holds 3 weeks of surveillance, it is held on a smart card similar to one that goes in the digital camera. You would think that in such a fancy home and housing the worlds most famous family would have a better set up than that. This story is just to fishy to me. Almost convenient.
Thanks Ford, that is the exact article I read back then. I remember about the cameras INSIDE the house.