0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
I agree that i never heard Michael singing his own name (is there something to understand in that ? ) He would have sing "everybody want a piece of me" Could it be to make us understand that he doesn't feel like being Michael Jackson (pop icon) anymore, and that it's something he's not controling anymore ? Like he would talk about someone he is not anymore. No idea...
DonteRJackson Your beliefs shouldn't be based on what u were told or what u heard, but rather what you have researched, studied, and prayed on♥ blessed be 4:41 PM Jul 16th via web DonteRJackson pay no mind to the 1's judging us. for they r unaware of their mastery. once they realize the truth in our mission. we will forgive them _*_ about 6 hours ago via web You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
And again.....DonteRJackson in the times to come ahead, only the strong in mind will survive. let that marinate. hehe Reminds us of "let it simmer." :mrgreen:
You know guys, after all this whoopla the last days, I just wonder why MJJ brand is so much under "sizzeling fire and the audience is going wild".I am kind of tired of the speculations and consider thinking that for some reason the MJJ we knew is not only dead but slowly being disassembled.Is that terrible? No. It is part of getting to know the man we never knew.Michael can still not take over because everybody still sees gold pants or dangerous / bad hero in him. One cannot be born again in the same shoes. They just don't fit anymore.We still seem to want the same music, the same man, the same feeling back.It's human nature. But it's not helpful. When your dearest love dream broke up - it was never again the same and would never be if tried a second time.Just letting my imagination run free:what if MJJ was an industry brand scam all along those years just to make bucks for everyone with falsifying the truth, the man, the voice, the look, the very person and what if Michael was just tired of all those lies? What if the body doubles were not his choice but of others running the business for him? What if the real voice of Michael is really recorded on that publication (mixed with the known voice)? What if it's just us who might not want to accept this? What if this song and all the strange surroundings during the last days is just a teaser for reality? What if the family is right in the sense that it is not MJJ but MJ on the CD?Michael wants to be loved like everybody does. If we would turn our back on him just because we don't want the truth to be true - how we might have been lied at - how that would kill him?
P.S. just to note how fast Sony is in making "Breaking News" on Youtube unaccessible. Never have seen that speed. Just to note.
Quote from: "truthprevails"Quote from: "~Souza~"Okay, so I finally got the chance to really listen to it and here are my thoughts: It's him and it's not him...you follow? :lol: I clearly hear 2 different voices. The one of which they turned the volume down is Mike IMO, the one we hear clearly is a voice double. Sometimes we only hear Mike, sometimes only the voice double and sometimes we hear them both. When I listen to it with my high quality earphones, it's not that obvious, but when I use my crappy cheap-ass Chinese ones that don't have any bass in it, it's more clear. So I think both Harvey and the family are right, there are two singing. So I voted both yes and no on the TMZ poll.Makes me think of "Always nice to sing with my brother".I agree! And it made me wonder whether Michael himself would release a song where his own voice is overwhelmed by other voices/chorus. I remember watching a rehearsal video where Michael instructed someone to lower the volume of the chorus to make his voice clearer... And therefore "Breaking News" is a bit un-MJ-like for me. His voice is always clear in his other songs, no?Now if MJ were/is alive, don't you think the music released would be all him?! They could easily say it was recorded pre-2009... Michael said he had hundreds of unreleased songs! I like the beat/rhythm of this song and the message, but the vocals bother me.He would if he wanted to make people think it's not him, but still be on the record himself. Like I posted earlier in the thread, if MJ is fucking Sony, he needs to be on the track himself, because those songs were sold to Sony as being unreleased MJ tracks.I als heard something interesting on the Dutch radio today where they were discussing it. They called someone from the fanclub who said that someone from Sony said back in 2004 that they made a few tracks with fake voice-overs (I don't see why, since MJ was available back then) and that they had a problem because they couldn't remember which ones were the real deal and which ones weren't. I thought that to be a little odd.
Quote from: "~Souza~"Okay, so I finally got the chance to really listen to it and here are my thoughts: It's him and it's not him...you follow? :lol: I clearly hear 2 different voices. The one of which they turned the volume down is Mike IMO, the one we hear clearly is a voice double. Sometimes we only hear Mike, sometimes only the voice double and sometimes we hear them both. When I listen to it with my high quality earphones, it's not that obvious, but when I use my crappy cheap-ass Chinese ones that don't have any bass in it, it's more clear. So I think both Harvey and the family are right, there are two singing. So I voted both yes and no on the TMZ poll.Makes me think of "Always nice to sing with my brother".I agree! And it made me wonder whether Michael himself would release a song where his own voice is overwhelmed by other voices/chorus. I remember watching a rehearsal video where Michael instructed someone to lower the volume of the chorus to make his voice clearer... And therefore "Breaking News" is a bit un-MJ-like for me. His voice is always clear in his other songs, no?Now if MJ were/is alive, don't you think the music released would be all him?! They could easily say it was recorded pre-2009... Michael said he had hundreds of unreleased songs! I like the beat/rhythm of this song and the message, but the vocals bother me.
Okay, so I finally got the chance to really listen to it and here are my thoughts: It's him and it's not him...you follow? :lol: I clearly hear 2 different voices. The one of which they turned the volume down is Mike IMO, the one we hear clearly is a voice double. Sometimes we only hear Mike, sometimes only the voice double and sometimes we hear them both. When I listen to it with my high quality earphones, it's not that obvious, but when I use my crappy cheap-ass Chinese ones that don't have any bass in it, it's more clear. So I think both Harvey and the family are right, there are two singing. So I voted both yes and no on the TMZ poll.Makes me think of "Always nice to sing with my brother".
I think it's all Michael singing and singing like we have never heard him sing. Michael is so talented and can disguise his voice as well as his looks. We are only now getting a taste of what all he is capable of. If he could pull off a hoax like this then what makes people think he couldn't sound totally different. It's all about Controversy. Controversy sells just like the Elephant man's bones, just like a Prince symbol, there one minute, gone the next. ***Magic*** ***Illusion*** Amusing or Confusing.
I'm on the fence with the lyrics because of the full name use in 3rd person. That's weird and doesn't sit right.Plus they're not real... edgy. Like there's no passion behind them. Like the person who wrote them wasn't really feeling it. I dunno, maybe I'm off there. But they certainly are NOT how Harvey described them.Still stuck on Harvey's "unbelievably good" statement...
