Michael Jackson's 'Breaking News' -- Full Song

[bec]

I'm on the fence with the lyrics because of the full name use in 3rd person. That's weird and doesn't sit right.

Plus they're not real... edgy. Like there's no passion behind them. Like the person who wrote them wasn't really feeling it. I dunno, maybe I'm off there. But they certainly are NOT how Harvey described them.

Still stuck on Harvey's "unbelievably good" statement...

Did you happen to see what I posted above?

I believe this is intentional sarcasm when he says his own name.

If you were hounded day and night and people kept wanting a piece of bec.
The media and people wanted to read it and feed it all the time.

Eventually you would be sarcastically saying your name and saying why everyone wants a piece of you. "Breaking News"
It wouldn't be because your you anymore it would be because your name is
Michael Jackson.

Does that make sense?

Ehh ok sure. If the voice sounded like MJ I'd be all on board with that.

But it doesn't. This is by design though so it's all up in the air anyway lol.

I think this is a purposefully created song designed to raise suspicions and make Sony look bad.

Already we got loads of non-believers on JCC saying they don't know what to believe anymore, and MJ taught them to question everything, and that everyone is lying, and nothing should be taken at face value, and everything should be looked into. They're so close, so so so close to asking the next BIG question...

I'm sitting on the sidelines over here it's like watching a horse race. Will non-believer stick a nose in front? We're in the home stretch and non-believer is making a come back bid to win it! Go non-believer go! Catch that truth! Beat it to the wire!

Ok sorry I got a little carried away lol.

[Grace]

[youtube:1ivr9ngp]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8wWBhoGEeSo[/youtube:1ivr9ngp]

I still think it's Micheal singing...

The lyrics are giving even some of what I said previously - I had not listened to the song in full because it was "not available". Thanks for posting the links!

[~Souza~]

[youtube:3lc196lq]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8wWBhoGEeSo&feature=player_embedded[/youtube:3lc196lq]

This acapella is interesting, that second voice I meant is cut out of it and this sounds way more like him.

[rayvyn]

[youtube:3fqu6tyb]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8wWBhoGEeSo[/youtube:3fqu6tyb]

I still think it's Micheal singing...

I've been thinking it was Michael, now I'm sure. Thank you for posting this.

[Tarja]

I am positive it's Mihael on Breaking new and as I said, he changed his voice on purpose and with the effects we hear it differently

[*Mo*]

[youtube:1xq4k8gq]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8wWBhoGEeSo[/youtube:1xq4k8gq]

I still think it's Micheal singing...

I'd like to know who leaked this track...because it's technically simply impossible to create an acapella version from a song you download or rip from an album.  You can edit the voice out to get a "karaoke" version, but it's can't be done the other way around ending up with a clear track like this.  Conclusion - this version was leaked by someone who has access to the original voice track.

[_Anna_]

I believe it is possible to get an acapella from a song. I remember I've seen a video done by PianoGames long ago and he took off all the background from the MTV Janet's Scream performance, and he let only her voice. Nothing else. So it is possible.

EDIT:
I found it.
Go to minute 6:28
[youtube:3o832e56]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w9uZxWu1slE[/youtube:3o832e56]

[bec]

Predictable, but I didn't think quite so fast as that

@Mo  :lol:

[*Mo*]

I believe it is possible to get an acapella from a song. I remember I've seen a video done by PianoGames long ago and he took off all the background from the MTV Janet's Scream performance, and he let only her voice. Nothing else. So it is possible.

No it's not Anna, because when you edit out the music you will automatically also edit out parts of the voice which have the same pitch.  As I said on page 7 of this thread - I took the song to the studio and asked a producer to help me out.  I even asked him to edit the music out so that we could listen to an "acapella" version, and he explained to me why it can't be done.  I'm sorry, but I think a producer very well knows what the possibilities are, don't you..?

[GINAFELICIA]

[youtube:159z1q76]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8wWBhoGEeSo&feature=player_embedded[/youtube:159z1q76]

This acapella is interesting, that second voice I meant is cut out of it and this sounds way more like him.

It sounds like him OK.

[GINAFELICIA]

I must agree with Harvey - this song is a vintage MJ.
I just LOVE it.........

.............. cause i'm just in love
this is breaking news...........................

[*Mo*]

Predictable, but I didn't think quite so fast as that

@Mo  :lol:

Hey, look what happened, it didn't even get ignored!  :lol:  :lol:

[_Anna_]

I believe it is possible to get an acapella from a song. I remember I've seen a video done by PianoGames long ago and he took off all the background from the MTV Janet's Scream performance, and he let only her voice. Nothing else. So it is possible.

No it's not Anna, because when you edit out the music you will automatically also edit out parts of the voice which have the same pitch.  As I said on page 7 of this thread - I took the song to the studio and asked a producer to help me out.  I even asked him to edit the music out so that we could listen to an "acapella" version, and he explained to me why it can't be done.  I'm sorry, but I think a producer very well knows what the possibilities are, don't you..?

Did you see the video I posted?
I am not a music producer but then how did the dude take out all the background and let only the voice?It was from a video ripped mp3 as well.

Now I am really curious, because I see that others can extract an acapella. So it's somehow important to know wether this is a fan made or it was leaked.

[chloead505]

What I don't get:
If the family is soooo hating the new song (not being MJ), why teh heck are we being told that Sony is going to release the album with cooperation with the Estate? Makes no sense to me.

The Estate is the business aspect of everything Michael Jackson. You cant sell a shirt with his face logo or name without being royally sued if you dont have permission from the Estate. Same goes for Music.

That was my point. So how come a song would be released without the Estate/Family actually giving consent? The family acts as if they had no right to stop Sony from releasing MJ song that is not MJ song...Get me?

[GINAFELICIA]

[youtube:xt89xu1o]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8wWBhoGEeSo[/youtube:xt89xu1o]

I still think it's Micheal singing...

I'd like to know who leaked this track...because it's technically simply impossible to create an acapella version from a song you download or rip from an album.  You can edit the voice out to get a "karaoke" version, but it's can't be done the other way around ending up with a clear track like this.  Conclusion - this version was leaked by someone who has access to the original voice track.

I am not an expert........ so I hope you know what are you talking about.

So the plot thickens  :lol:

Love you Michael........