0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Quote *Mo* wrote: I still looking for answers on the following: TS is very persistent on the Eliza Presley court case, yet in his last post on 9/9/2010 he states that Elvis/Jesse STILL has Linda Hood Sigmon as an informer. It's known as from December 2009 that Linda doesn't support the ongoing court case anymore because Jesse asked Eliza to stop, and Eliza refused. Then why did TS suggest we'd get some media attention for her court case and, why did he encourage and support the twitter and email rallies?In my opinion there are just two options:1.He's not very familiar with all of Linda's website and didn't know Linda stopped supporting the case because Jesse asked Eliza to drop it.2.He did know, but decided that the end justifies the means.Both options raise more questions:•Option 1 leads to the question: Can one guide the hoaxers according to MJ's plan when one's not completely familiar with a case of which one insists is a very important part of the MJ hoax?•Option 2 leads to the question: Why would MJ willingly go against Jesse's wishes, just to serve the purpose of is own hoax, by jeopardizing the safety and well being of a man he greatly admired?This is the confusion that I have for several days
*Mo* wrote: I still looking for answers on the following: TS is very persistent on the Eliza Presley court case, yet in his last post on 9/9/2010 he states that Elvis/Jesse STILL has Linda Hood Sigmon as an informer. It's known as from December 2009 that Linda doesn't support the ongoing court case anymore because Jesse asked Eliza to stop, and Eliza refused. Then why did TS suggest we'd get some media attention for her court case and, why did he encourage and support the twitter and email rallies?In my opinion there are just two options:1.He's not very familiar with all of Linda's website and didn't know Linda stopped supporting the case because Jesse asked Eliza to drop it.2.He did know, but decided that the end justifies the means.Both options raise more questions:•Option 1 leads to the question: Can one guide the hoaxers according to MJ's plan when one's not completely familiar with a case of which one insists is a very important part of the MJ hoax?•Option 2 leads to the question: Why would MJ willingly go against Jesse's wishes, just to serve the purpose of is own hoax, by jeopardizing the safety and well being of a man he greatly admired?
Quote from: "paula-c"Quote *Mo* wrote: I still looking for answers on the following: TS is very persistent on the Eliza Presley court case, yet in his last post on 9/9/2010 he states that Elvis/Jesse STILL has Linda Hood Sigmon as an informer. It's known as from December 2009 that Linda doesn't support the ongoing court case anymore because Jesse asked Eliza to stop, and Eliza refused. Then why did TS suggest we'd get some media attention for her court case and, why did he encourage and support the twitter and email rallies?In my opinion there are just two options:1.He's not very familiar with all of Linda's website and didn't know Linda stopped supporting the case because Jesse asked Eliza to drop it.2.He did know, but decided that the end justifies the means.Both options raise more questions:•Option 1 leads to the question: Can one guide the hoaxers according to MJ's plan when one's not completely familiar with a case of which one insists is a very important part of the MJ hoax?•Option 2 leads to the question: Why would MJ willingly go against Jesse's wishes, just to serve the purpose of is own hoax, by jeopardizing the safety and well being of a man he greatly admired?This is the confusion that I have for several daysI don't think it's as overly simplistic as you are presenting it Mo. Maybe there's more to the story. Maybe there's reasons that we don't understand yet. Maybe TS knows the whole thing is a fake and this IS the test and he's making a point.But I'm still not understanding how you can think TS is a fake considering the connections to TMZ, Sony, the Jacksons, AND the estate without saying MJ is dead using the murder theory, which, as we've discussed at length, in widely held opinion based on critically tested long standing theory, is completely nonsensical.Because if you're saying TS is a fake with connections to TMZ, Sony, the Jacksons, and Sony, (but not MJ), and was developed for product advertisement, then you're saying that MJ is dead, and if MJ is dead, considering the Murray connection, you're looking at murder, and by all appearances Sony would be under suspicion considering what they stood to gain... but now I'm just theorizing in circles.Please correct me where I'm going off track Mo. I'm thoroughly confused on how you're arriving at this catastrophic chain of events in belief.
posting facts about the inadmissible DNA evidence Eliza Presley submitted in court which we all, except for Souza, seem to have overlooked.
Quote from: "*Mo*" posting facts about the inadmissible DNA evidence Eliza Presley submitted in court which we all, except for Souza, seem to have overlooked.This is right. When i read about it (somewhere)I thought it was an opinion of some sort, not a fact.So, I am still a bit confused. Was TS who wrote that those tests were not admisible for court or was the lawyer? Also, what should we take/ learn from this case? That people can go to court wih no proofs, as happened with MJ and Arvizo? , or that the law can do anything with no proof, as happened when Neverland was raided?
Also, what should we take/ learn from this case? That people can go to court wih no proofs, as happened with MJ and Arvizo? , or that the law can do anything with no proof, as happened when Neverland was raided?
Quote from: "Gema"Also, what should we take/ learn from this case? That people can go to court wih no proofs, as happened with MJ and Arvizo? , or that the law can do anything with no proof, as happened when Neverland was raided?Gema, I just posted facts, something which was obviously needed as it's proven by the many highly surprised reactions that people didn't know. That's all I did, and whatever everyone wants to do with it is the people's own responsibility. It is however important to thoroughly investigate all the evidence that's offered to us.
@SouzaThe info even if was read, it was not understood properly and I think that it happened because of the lenght of TS´s posts. Too much info to digest, even for a native English speaker.
Also, What happened to Mociennes court case?
Quote from: "Gema"@SouzaThe info even if was read, it was not understood properly and I think that it happened because of the lenght of TS´s posts. Too much info to digest, even for a native English speaker.It wasn't in TS' post, it was in the lawyer's blog and explained the same way as Mo did. What I am saying is that people should read before they judge. The lawyer was attacked for distorting the facts while he didn't and provided us with the right information. So I have no problems with the info posted again, I have a problem with the way it was presented.
It wasn't in TS' post, it was in the lawyer's blog and explained the same way as Mo did. What I am saying is that people should read before they judge. The lawyer was attacked for distorting the facts while he didn't and provided us with the right information. So I have no problems with the info posted again, I have a problem with the way it was presented.
"Eliza can establish the chain of custody showing how she obtained the samples."
Quote from: "bec"Quote from: "paula-c"Quote *Mo* wrote: I still looking for answers on the following: TS is very persistent on the Eliza Presley court case, yet in his last post on 9/9/2010 he states that Elvis/Jesse STILL has Linda Hood Sigmon as an informer. It's known as from December 2009 that Linda doesn't support the ongoing court case anymore because Jesse asked Eliza to stop, and Eliza refused. Then why did TS suggest we'd get some media attention for her court case and, why did he encourage and support the twitter and email rallies?In my opinion there are just two options:1.He's not very familiar with all of Linda's website and didn't know Linda stopped supporting the case because Jesse asked Eliza to drop it.2.He did know, but decided that the end justifies the means.Both options raise more questions:•Option 1 leads to the question: Can one guide the hoaxers according to MJ's plan when one's not completely familiar with a case of which one insists is a very important part of the MJ hoax?•Option 2 leads to the question: Why would MJ willingly go against Jesse's wishes, just to serve the purpose of is own hoax, by jeopardizing the safety and well being of a man he greatly admired?This is the confusion that I have for several daysI don't think it's as overly simplistic as you are presenting it Mo. Maybe there's more to the story. Maybe there's reasons that we don't understand yet. Maybe TS knows the whole thing is a fake and this IS the test and he's making a point.But I'm still not understanding how you can think TS is a fake considering the connections to TMZ, Sony, the Jacksons, AND the estate without saying MJ is dead using the murder theory, which, as we've discussed at length, in widely held opinion based on critically tested long standing theory, is completely nonsensical.Because if you're saying TS is a fake with connections to TMZ, Sony, the Jacksons, and Sony, (but not MJ), and was developed for product advertisement, then you're saying that MJ is dead, and if MJ is dead, considering the Murray connection, you're looking at murder, and by all appearances Sony would be under suspicion considering what they stood to gain... but now I'm just theorizing in circles.Please correct me where I'm going off track Mo. I'm thoroughly confused on how you're arriving at this catastrophic chain of events in belief.Bec, I simply asked questions. Every question about TS is immediately overloaded with answers, except for these ones. "Maybe" and "let's wait and see" are the only answers I have seen so far. That means I'm not the only one who's wondering about this.I never said MJ is dead, I never said MJ was murdered and I never said TS is a fake, yet it's assumed that I think he's dead, TS is covering up a murder and I'm done with the hoax. It sure is interesting to see how people interpret my posts and jump to conclusions while the only thing that caused all this is me posting facts about the inadmissible DNA evidence Eliza Presley submitted in court which we all, except for Souza, seem to have overlooked.
TS wrote :In fact, all you need to do is ask people to go to You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login whether they are Elvis fans, or MJ fans, or anyone really—maybe we can even get the attention of the media! This is an easy domain name to remember, and it’s already pointed to this thread (and it will stay here, even if TIAI redirects elsewhere). Also, I will be watching this thread pretty closely; and if anyone posts ridicule or other non-evidence based objections, I will be here to call them on it (unless someone else does before I do).