This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - KacyLovesMJ
Filter to certain boards:
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 13
31
« on: July 15, 2010, 04:01:17 PM »
"I'm getting the same question over and over again" :lol: Wish they woulda answered it!
32
« on: July 15, 2010, 03:57:43 PM »
I just tuned into the show (just got on the forum lol).... are they sitting outside or something? Sheesh! lol
No that's "Live - Oksana's Move to Take Custody From Mel" . Mute it
Yeah I found it. lol
33
« on: July 15, 2010, 03:55:44 PM »
I just tuned into the show (just got on the forum lol).... are they sitting outside or something? Sheesh! lol
Edit: Nevermind. It was the video on down the page making all that noise. LOL
34
« on: July 15, 2010, 03:48:14 PM »
Ive just been reading Pearls book and going over the old stuff again.
This picture has always bugged me and when i was reminded me of the "Susan Rush" circus thing.. i thought of this picture.
This picture was taken years before Conrad was associated with MJ. So Conrad isnt a celebrity or well known.
He is an old, ugly doctor with multiple baby mommas and money troubles according to what we are told.
So why on earth, in this picture, is he sat in the centre and surrounded by young beautiful women fawning and draping themselves over him?? The pic looks like he is a celeb or something... i mean, WHY???
This makes no sense to me........... Is Conrad Murray a real doctor at all? Part of me thinks he might be but the biggest part of me thinks no way. lol But I guess that question won't be answered until this is all over with. :/
35
« on: July 12, 2010, 12:21:01 AM »
Just to add my 2 cents in here. lol I also believe his middle name is legally Joe for a few reasons but the biggest one is that the FBI files (which would have to have the true full name) states that his true full name is Michael Joe Jackson. For those stating that it could just be a short version, this cannot be legal, no matter how many attorneys tell you that it's ok. If "Michael Joe Jackson" is on his BC, that is what they have to go by for the DC and all other legal documents. My ex stepdad's name is Danny. If he were to fake his death and his DC said "Daniel", and then he was found or decided to come back, he could legally fight that because his BC says, "Danny". Yes, Danny is short for Daniel but Daniel is not his name. Same would apply here. 
36
« on: July 11, 2010, 11:27:25 AM »
Ok I'm gonna try to be a voice of reason here. Guys we need to stop the bashing and hate that's going on in the forums. Can you imagine if someone new started believing that Michael is alive and comes here and sees all of this? All it is doing is making them go, "OMG, is there another forum? I don't want to have to read stuff like this everyday!" and pushing them to another forum out there. This kind of attitude and bashing of people is not doing anyone any good at all. If you don't like Maura, then just don't go to her forum. There is no reason to start threads here bashing her for what's going on over there. If you must bash her, bash her to her face, not here. That's not what we are about.
37
« on: July 10, 2010, 11:25:14 PM »
I'm in and will do all I can to help out. It may not be a whole lot like some of you can do because I'm in college but I will do what I can. lol
38
« on: July 10, 2010, 09:36:42 AM »
I was at the hospital for the majority of last night with my uncle and aunt. My uncle is in the hospital and they aren't sure if what's wrong with him will be ok by putting fluids into him (his kidneys had shut down and he was badly dehydrated) but things started looking up because he was getting his color back and seemed in really good spirits. While my mom and I were talking to my aunt in the waiting room, we noticed she had a ton of Elvis stuff (her purse, cover for her phone, wallet, etc) so mom was talking to her about the Jesse thing and how Elvis could still be alive and then we went onto the topic of Michael. I'm not really sure if my aunt was/is a fan of Michael's but the entire time we were talking about him, she was agreeing with everything we were saying. My mom said, "If they did fake their deaths, I wouldn't blame them at all." and I said, "No, especially Michael, because he has been under such extreme scrutiny all of his life." and my aunt nodded her head in agreement and then said, "I never believed any of those accusations they brought against him. If he had really done that to those two kids, then he would have done it to several more. Look at how many children he let in to Neverland." I think people need to stop believing everything the media says and do their own research. I honestly didn't watch the video from this person because I've seen enough bashing of Michael, especially over this past year and it would just make me mad. I'm tired of people going by what the media says and not doing their own research. But I must say, if I was going to respond to this guy, this is the story I would tell him to try and help open his eyes.
39
« on: July 08, 2010, 10:00:49 PM »
Yeah, this is too tempting to not reply to. I ignored it yesterday but I just have to reply to this. Ok, first of did you see me arguing with someone? Ahh trust me if that was what I wanted to do, I would do it when 3 or 4 people jumped on me at the same time  Yes, you are arguing with every one of us that believes in TS. I mean no offense when I say this but maybe because you aren't an "English speaker", although you do a very good job of it, the way you come across to everyone here that tries to help you understand is very smuggish and has an attitude to it. It's like you do not want to understand even though we are doing our best to spell it out for you. So in turn, you reply with your rude comments or smug questions. This is the way it comes across and if you don't see that, please re-read your replies to me and others on this thread. If you still can't see it, then I don't know what to tell you. I am not here to start a fight with you or anyone else. I was trying to help you and all you did was come back at me with smug comments for it. I never "jumped" on you til your attitude was thrown at me. Calm down Kacy, ok ok you're the BEST hoaxer, you won the game lol This is a perfect example of what I was just talking about. I never stated anywhere in my reply to you that I was the "BEST hoaxer" and I never said I wanted to win anything. This was a sarcastic comment brought on without being provoked. You asked when I got involved in the hoax and I answered. You tried to belittle me with that question and act like I was a "newbie" to this and all I did was give you an answer, even though it did offend me that you speculated that I was new to this. Sorry, you cannot be the only one to get offended here because you are offending a lot of us as well. So you're in the hoax thing for a long time but how come you do NOT have an idea about the Army of L.O.V.E thing? If I remember correctly, you said this was started on Facebook, right? Can you give me proof that it was started before December 22, 2009? And if it was, no, I didn't have any idea about it because I do not follow everyone under the sun to know what everyone is saying. Sorry, I have better things to do with my time than follow a Facebook group. Ohh this's a question and I shouldn't ask you one right? Ok sorry got it back. Again, another example of what I said in my first part of this reply. I never stated you could not ask me a question. I'm just tired of arguing back and forth with you when you refuse to open your mind at all to any of the stuff we are saying to try and help you. But I never once stated you couldn't ask me a question. Don't put words in my mouth. And I'm so sorry to disagree with you about TS lol yeah I'm the one who doesn't think in that little box. I don't care if you agree with me about TS. I really don't. Again, I was only trying to help you understand. You're the one that started this topic and wanted answers and I was being NICE and trying to help you. Lesson learned for me. I will not try to help you again. And you want to talk about people questioning your IQ and eyes but yet you tell me, someone who has not said one thing like that to you, that I think inside a little box? You do not know me. And trust me, people that do know me know that I do not think inside a little box. Just because I do believe TS does not mean that I think inside a little box. That was an insult thrown at everyone here that believes in TS. Good job. :roll: I'm making a division? How am I doing it, can you pls explain it to me? ohh wait you can't do that either. Did I tell someone to distrust TS? Did I force someone to make a post here? You're the one who came to this post and wrote your idea. Do you want this place to be a worship place for TS? Everyone in this universe has to agree with you about TS and the ones who don't, are bad people, they're making division? Ohh how mature really. Sorry but no more answering your smugness even if you write or not :lol:
P.S: Soon this post will be locked no worries about that and you could keep on living in your small boxes[/b] Yes, in your own way because you refuse to see anything anyone puts right in front of you, you are trying to force people to not believe in TS. And at the same time, you are making a division by spreading this whole "people that believe in TS and people that don't". The way you are coming across with it, it's as if you are separating us into two different groups instead of looking at the bigger picture and realizing that even though we may not all agree with everything, we are all still looking for the same thing, the TRUTH of what happened to Michael Jackson on June 25, 2009. If you personally do not believe in TS, then that is your right but you do not have to keep asking the same things over and over when people are trying to help you and you just flat out refuse to see what we give you. There is a thing called "selective hearing" and that is when you only hear things you want to hear and you have a form of that here but it's with seeing things. You do not want to see the proof that is right in front of your eyes so you are refusing to. Like I told you in another thread that you had made about this very same thing, if TS ends up being fake, then those of us that believed in him only have ourselves to blame for believing in him but if he's not fake, then that is AWESOME. I never once said that everyone had to agree with me and the ones that didn't were bad people. You really need to stop putting words in people's mouths and READ what they actually are saying, just like you keep preaching at us to do even though we ARE reading everything you are saying but it's hard to with all that attitude thrown in every post you make. And I never said this place needed to be a worship ground for TS. Did I say that? Read my post again and you will find the answer is NO. Just because I believe in TS does not mean I expect everyone else to and I respect people's decisions not to. I came here, trying to help you, which is what you were asking from us, and THIS is how you treat people that help you. I'm not the only one you have gotten this way with. I do understand your purpose of wanting to know that TS is legit and having concrete evidence that no one can chalk up to being a coincidence but you are not seeing that no matter WHAT we come up with for the Jacksons to tweet about, it'll get out there that TS really is legit with that concrete evidence and then Michael's entire plan for this hoax was for naught. Please try and see that, that is all I ask. Now, once and for all, I have said all I have to say and I'm done here. If you come back at me like you did in your reply here, it will be ignored for good. If you can talk to me like a human being and without insults, you might get an answer from me on whatever else you want to ask me. It's your choice. But just like you have the right to ask questions, I have the right to ignore them if they are rude or hateful. With L.O.V.E.
40
« on: July 08, 2010, 09:58:26 AM »
I do have to admit that towards the end of the video, when she compares that picture to Michael in This Is It, it does look the same like the picture may be more recent than we think or that is being reported BUT if she is implying that Michael has been disguised as Janet all this time, I can't agree with that. I know there has been odd things surrounding Janet and her "new songs" but to go so far as to say that Michael is disguising himself as his sister... this just reminds me of all the media stories about Michael and Janet being the same person and I don't like it. He's been through that enough. It needs to stop. :/
41
« on: July 07, 2010, 10:56:43 PM »
Ok I said I wasn't going to post here anymore but you replied to me in such a way that you knew it would make me respond again. This is a manipulation tactic and I mean it this time, after this one, I WILL NOT reply to you again because what I see from you is that you just want to start an argument with everyone that believes in TS and I don't care what kind of "I believe in 80% of what TS says" things you say, I can see through that now. You asked how long I've been involved in this hoax. SINCE THIS MONTH LAST YEAR! It was 2 weeks after the memorial that I started seeing things were not adding up with all of this and made me question his death so DO NOT try to belittle me with your comments. Michael would not want any of us to do that and all I see that you are doing is trying to create division which is something else he would not want us to do. So I answered your question and I will not reply to your smugness. Have a great day/evening.
And btw, my sign up date to THIS forum is later in the year but I was a part of the old forum under the SAME name.
42
« on: July 07, 2010, 08:35:11 PM »
RestlessSoul, this is the last time I'm gonna post on this topic or any other where it states stuff like this. One more time, let's look at the time that the Jacksons DID tweet something that TS started: Recruiting Soldiers for Michael’s Army of L.O.V.E.
Postby TS » Tue Dec 22, 2009 2:36 am Do you see the date that this was posted? This is the first time that this was said, "Army of L.O.V.E.", at least that I can remember. Now let's look at this: Jackson Fans are an army of L.O.V.E. The media should take notice. Always, Jermaine J 11:06 PM Mar 11th via TweetDeck So, TS posts about an Army of L.O.V.E. for Michael on December 22, 2009 and then JERMAINE tweets about the very same thing AND tells the media that they should take notice on March 11th, 2010. If you do not see this as a "sign" that you have been wanting, then I hate to say it but you are being stubborn. However, I will give another hint on my identity, and the source for my information: so far, I have only seen one discussion that was correct. Should Jacksons tweet about This Is Also It, as some have suggested, so that there will be no doubt? Actually, I already addressed this very question in Update #2 {You are not allowed to view links.
Register or Login}. See also Update 5a, section 5-2, comment about 5-5 redirect: a very similar tweet that was also from Jermaine {You are not allowed to view links.
Register or Login}.
43
« on: July 05, 2010, 11:36:53 PM »
You are not allowed to view links.
Register or Login
44
« on: July 05, 2010, 11:32:57 PM »
Done
45
« on: July 05, 2010, 08:33:00 PM »
Well if it is michael at least he is eating. But I really think it is just Tito messing about This made me laugh. lol Of course he is eating. 
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 13
|
Show Posts
