0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
You are not allowed to view links. Register or LoginMichael Jackson's daughter Paris made a bombshell announcement to friends ... telling them the MJ album released in the wake of the singer's death did NOT contain MJ's actual voice ... it was an imposter.TMZ has learned ... the announcement was made during an online video chat with several friends in 2008 ... just before the "Michael" album was released, which contains several previously unreleased tracks allegedly performed by Michael Jackson. The video chat was recorded ... and Paris joked about the footage eventually "leaking" to the Internet.Paris had made the announcement in the midst of rumors that MJ's parts on the "Michael" album were REALLY performed by an MJ sound-alike named Jason Malachi ... but both Jason and Sony denied the allegations.During the video chat, Paris played one of the songs from the album, "Hold My Hand" ... and one of her friends asks why the singer doesn't sound like MJ. Paris replied, "It's NOT him ... the whole album isn't even him!! Go online ... go on YouTube and look up Jason Malachi. That's him!!"She continues, "I should know if it's him or not because he would sing to me all the time."TMZ has learned a recording of Paris' video message is being shopped to various media outlets ... and we're told "Offers are on the table."Link You are not allowed to view links. Register or LoginI wonder who this Jason Malachi REALLY is. And I wonder whether Paris is stirring the pot of controversy to shake us all up a bit! You remember MJ talking about his ears in This is It? That he wanted to be able to hear his own voice without having earpieces shoved like a fist into his orifices?I bet this is a clue to open our ears since our eyes are already wide open, staring at pics of MJ and making various observations. Just my two cents...Titania
Michael Jackson's daughter Paris made a bombshell announcement to friends ... telling them the MJ album released in the wake of the singer's death did NOT contain MJ's actual voice ... it was an imposter.TMZ has learned ... the announcement was made during an online video chat with several friends in 2008 ... just before the "Michael" album was released, which contains several previously unreleased tracks allegedly performed by Michael Jackson. The video chat was recorded ... and Paris joked about the footage eventually "leaking" to the Internet.Paris had made the announcement in the midst of rumors that MJ's parts on the "Michael" album were REALLY performed by an MJ sound-alike named Jason Malachi ... but both Jason and Sony denied the allegations.During the video chat, Paris played one of the songs from the album, "Hold My Hand" ... and one of her friends asks why the singer doesn't sound like MJ. Paris replied, "It's NOT him ... the whole album isn't even him!! Go online ... go on YouTube and look up Jason Malachi. That's him!!"She continues, "I should know if it's him or not because he would sing to me all the time."TMZ has learned a recording of Paris' video message is being shopped to various media outlets ... and we're told "Offers are on the table."Link You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
How do we know Paris even said this?
Two points, why are TMZ bringing this up again now? And why did they put 2008 in original article and then change it to 2010 after I swear it'd been pointed out here, though I can't for the life of me see the posts now!
TMZ has learned a recording of Paris' video message is being shopped to various media outlets ... and we're told "Offers are on the table."
QuoteTMZ has learned a recording of Paris' video message is being shopped to various media outlets ... and we're told "Offers are on the table."So someone is SELLING this recording? WTF??
Referring to the date 2008 it's possible Gina that it's a mistake...but then again...I doubt it. I think 2008 is there on purpose. Will see what happens with the article (I'll laugh if they change the date in a few hours time...they're watchin').As for this bit: She continues, "I should know if it's him or not because he would sing to me all the time."doesn't make sense *IF* the conversation was really in 2008, as alleged in the article, Paris is talking about her Dad in the past tense before he had even "died". In 2008 it should be this:"I should know if it's him or not because he sings to me all the time."