0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
MJ's true height has always seemed a mystery. I don't think there are 2 (or more) MJ's, just the one. Doubles used for distractions, yes, but only one actual MJ. The height thing could be as simple as lifts in shoes, as suggested before. Not only lifts in MJ's shoes but also others, like KO or TP or whoever else. Wear them one day, not another - differences in height. Might be a simple explanation but why over-complicate it?
Mattie, it's not a no go area. We've had several threads discussing the possibility of 2 MJs. I started one myself not long ago. Just because not everyone (me included) agrees doesn't mean you can't or shouldn't talk about it if you want to. It is a fascinating idea!All I personally would disagree with in your comments above, is that I don't think 'more than one MJ' is the only possible explanation for the differences we've witnessed over the years.And your English is just fine, so no worries there!
You are not allowed to view links. Register or LoginMattie, it's not a no go area. We've had several threads discussing the possibility of 2 MJs. I started one myself not long ago. Just because not everyone (me included) agrees doesn't mean you can't or shouldn't talk about it if you want to. It is a fascinating idea!All I personally would disagree with in your comments above, is that I don't think 'more than one MJ' is the only possible explanation for the differences we've witnessed over the years.And your English is just fine, so no worries there!I dont say/mean it is the only possible explanation(thats my problem in expressing myself)but until now nobody came with a better/evidence explanation for me.For me, all the difference can not be explaned away with high heels/make up and lightning..and that is the only answer you get and you have to be okay with..most members resist any idea of more than one MJ and dont want to dig deeperBut for me something else is going on..and if i could i would investigate this..But unfortunaly my English is not good enough!Thats what i think is a missed change.But i dont overreact/overcomplicate and can let go!So be it.
what was the comment from Liberian Girl? exactly which michael jackson are we talking about (that might not be the exact quote)? ummm does that necessarily have to imply just two? i have begun to think in terms of at least a few.
"There is Michael JacksonThat ain't none Michael Jackson....."
You are not allowed to view links. Register or LoginYou are not allowed to view links. Register or LoginMattie, it's not a no go area. We've had several threads discussing the possibility of 2 MJs. I started one myself not long ago. Just because not everyone (me included) agrees doesn't mean you can't or shouldn't talk about it if you want to. It is a fascinating idea!All I personally would disagree with in your comments above, is that I don't think 'more than one MJ' is the only possible explanation for the differences we've witnessed over the years.And your English is just fine, so no worries there!I dont say/mean it is the only possible explanation(thats my problem in expressing myself)but until now nobody came with a better/evidence explanation for me.For me, all the difference can not be explaned away with high heels/make up and lightning..and that is the only answer you get and you have to be okay with..most members resist any idea of more than one MJ and dont want to dig deeperBut for me something else is going on..and if i could i would investigate this..But unfortunaly my English is not good enough!Thats what i think is a missed change.But i dont overreact/overcomplicate and can let go!So be it. if u are TRULY curious about something u owe it to urself to check it out ( self gratification). maybe u can find something in ur native tongue on it. afterwards should u care to share, just throw it out there. i agree ur english is fine.
Mattie, have you read this thread You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login ?I (and others) posted alternative possibilities in there, if you're interested.
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Loginwhat was the comment from Liberian Girl? exactly which michael jackson are we talking about (that might not be the exact quote)? ummm does that necessarily have to imply just two? i have begun to think in terms of at least a few. Suspicious ,my alternative to a few is: none :icon_geek: :thjajaja121: :LolLolLolLol: !!!!Privacy:Quote"There is Michael JacksonThat ain't none Michael Jackson....."
Actually i don't believe that there are 2 MJ's but I'm open to any new theory because I'm a beLIEver since 2009. But in order to convince people with such a theory there must be good evidence. May be we should start a new thread where we can post all the pro's and contra's and see what we will discover at the end. May be it's time to put our investigation glasse on again!
You are not allowed to view links. Register or LoginYou are not allowed to view links. Register or LoginYou are not allowed to view links. Register or LoginMattie, it's not a no go area. We've had several threads discussing the possibility of 2 MJs. I started one myself not long ago. Just because not everyone (me included) agrees doesn't mean you can't or shouldn't talk about it if you want to. It is a fascinating idea!All I personally would disagree with in your comments above, is that I don't think 'more than one MJ' is the only possible explanation for the differences we've witnessed over the years.And your English is just fine, so no worries there!I dont say/mean it is the only possible explanation(thats my problem in expressing myself)but until now nobody came with a better/evidence explanation for me.For me, all the difference can not be explaned away with high heels/make up and lightning..and that is the only answer you get and you have to be okay with..most members resist any idea of more than one MJ and dont want to dig deeperBut for me something else is going on..and if i could i would investigate this..But unfortunaly my English is not good enough!Thats what i think is a missed change.But i dont overreact/overcomplicate and can let go!So be it. if u are TRULY curious about something u owe it to urself to check it out ( self gratification). maybe u can find something in ur native tongue on it. afterwards should u care to share, just throw it out there. i agree ur english is fine.Dont you think i tried that?? In my native tongue there is nothing of interest.And wen i speak about it they make fun of me.In the English laguage wen it gets difficult i have problems in understandig so i can not find my way further.It is not that simpel for me,you dont know how much time it takes for me to write this.A lot of words i have to looke up before writing..And translater is no option because i can not read my own words anymore wen i use that.But it is okay..i keep on reading and maybe one day :icon_e_smile:
You are not allowed to view links. Register or LoginYou are not allowed to view links. Register or LoginYou are not allowed to view links. Register or LoginYou are not allowed to view links. Register or LoginMattie, it's not a no go area. We've had several threads discussing the possibility of 2 MJs. I started one myself not long ago. Just because not everyone (me included) agrees doesn't mean you can't or shouldn't talk about it if you want to. It is a fascinating idea!All I personally would disagree with in your comments above, is that I don't think 'more than one MJ' is the only possible explanation for the differences we've witnessed over the years.And your English is just fine, so no worries there!I dont say/mean it is the only possible explanation(thats my problem in expressing myself)but until now nobody came with a better/evidence explanation for me.For me, all the difference can not be explaned away with high heels/make up and lightning..and that is the only answer you get and you have to be okay with..most members resist any idea of more than one MJ and dont want to dig deeperBut for me something else is going on..and if i could i would investigate this..But unfortunaly my English is not good enough!Thats what i think is a missed change.But i dont overreact/overcomplicate and can let go!So be it. if u are TRULY curious about something u owe it to urself to check it out ( self gratification). maybe u can find something in ur native tongue on it. afterwards should u care to share, just throw it out there. i agree ur english is fine.Dont you think i tried that?? In my native tongue there is nothing of interest.And wen i speak about it they make fun of me.In the English laguage wen it gets difficult i have problems in understandig so i can not find my way further.It is not that simpel for me,you dont know how much time it takes for me to write this.A lot of words i have to looke up before writing..And translater is no option because i can not read my own words anymore wen i use that.But it is okay..i keep on reading and maybe one day :icon_e_smile:to say- don't u think i've tried that :icon_e_surprised: can be considered abrasive. which will put someone in a defensive mode, which is where i was about to go, with a reply of "excuse the hell out of me". but i remembered english isn't ur first language. it's best to say i've tried that. good luck on that which u seek