0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Well, well and another well. So this thread has proven to the most excitment my little brain has had in along time !!!! So it DOES take two to tango so I suggest we put on a newer, faster song and all dance by yourselves for a moment. That way no one steps on anothers toes and you do not have to lead OR follow !!!Get my Drift ? Fast songs and dancing by yourselves allows you to make up your own steps and to move to the rythm however you like. I have been here from the beginning and I have kept my opinions to myself about theories, TS, Elvis, MJ being likened to Jesus and who knows what about who and who has inside info and who is really who. I just read and filter with my little brain. What I like goes in what I don't get or don't like goes out. In the end it does not matter where info comes from, just that it is good and well researched info.Dance to the fast dances people and make up your own steps and your own rhythm. " And the beat goes on....and the beat goes on." Just my opinion
As much as I dislike the "war" going on here I dislike the continuance of spreading half truths, especially when several members have clearly stated that they most certainly do not appreciate this. Therefore I have no other choice but to address the new half truth that appeared in this thread yesterday, together with pointing out the twisting of words, assumptions and distractions. I want the truth out here, based on facts, instead of assumptions because "they make more sense". I'm not attacking people, I'm just setting the records straight.I will try to keep this as short as possible, because I have noticed that many people don't even bother to read long posts and instead prefer to rely on other people's replies which often are biased and based on misinterpreting.The complete honest truth about the thisisalmostit twitter account according to Souza is again a half truth. The intentions as Souza described them in her reply to Wizz were not what her plan was, there never has been talk about her having the intention to run it shortly and then reveal who was behind it to prove to the fans how easy it was to deceive people. Had that been the case, then the objections Wizz and I made to her idea would have had no ground. Wizz never took advantage of anyone, he just tweeted his OWN thoughts and ideas. It's not that Souza didn't agree with it because "it was deceiving members for making believe that our and their theories were the truth". Souza FULLY supported thisisalmostit until non members of MJDHI started suspecting that SHE was running this account. That is when she started saying: Although his tweets and ideas are very good, I don't like it that people suspect I'm behind it. I told her many times: People suspect you are running TIAI and think you are TS as well, but since this is no more true than you running thisisalmost it, I don't see the problem. She didn't ask Wizz to reveal himself, she just wanted him to stop tweeting and at one point she even forbid him to tweet from that account, because she wanted the suspicion to be taken away from her. Wizz started tweeting again a couple of weeks ago because a) he missed the feedback and interaction he got from that account and b) Souza has no right forbidding him to tweet. That is when a dirty game started. Behind the curtain Souza started telling people that "The thisisalmostit twitter is run by a friend of Mo's" and that "she doesn't approve of what the person behind thisisalmostit is doing but feels her hands are tied to publicly speak out" without telling who's idea it originally was and without telling that she did approve it for a long time. And yes, I have proof of what I stated here.THAT is the complete honest truth about the thisisalmostit twitter account, nothing more and nothing less.On with the rest:I never said I distance myself from the blogs we wrote, nor did I say I reject the blogs we wrote. I simply pointed out what caused us to write these blogs and who's ideas they were based upon. My words were again twisted.I haven't written a theory, I have stated facts. Since I didn't present a theory, I don't have to present arguments to support the facts I stated.Souza's replies clearly show that elaborating publicly on our personal disagreements is more important to her than the FACTS I presented. By stating her personal views and assumptions on our disagreements people are again led to think into a certain direction.I have tried to settle this matter privately several times, even by calling in Badkolo's help to mediate as he is a co-owner of MJDHI as well. Unfortunately all my attempts failed. Besides Skype and MSN there are other ways to contact me such as PM or giving me a phone call, but Souza choose to take this to the boards while spreading lies about me to other members behind the curtain. I have seen replies by members she is in touch with which shocked me deeply and clearly show a very dirty game is played. She is the one who started blocking me, not the other way around. And yes, I have proof of this as well.I'm accused of manipulating the members by telling the truth and my integrity again is questioned. I wonder what is more manipulative and not upright: Coming forward with the truth to all our members or keep hiding the truth and continuing to support an anonymous person?I'm accused of attacking Souza by bringing this info into the open, but clearly people don't realize that by doing that I'm also attacking myself. I myself have hidden these facts for a year as well, so I'm as much "guilty as charged" as she is.It's striking that time after time conveniently FACTS are ignored while unimportant and totally irrelevant issues are being addressed extendedly. To me this clearly shows that to some people it's important to distract the attention from what I have written and it's of their utmost importance to discredit me. When realizing certain things might come to light that will prove things are indeed twisted and the truth is still being hidden all of a sudden it's suggested "to take this private, instead of causing another war on the forum".As to what Bob said about religion and Bob's quote about it - here's his FULL quote: "religion IS a brainwash.. God don't need no men in dresses baby".Another big difference between 'Bob' and TS is the subject of multicontextual research. It was 'Bob' who introduced me to multicontextual research last December, but after I pointed out to multicontextual research regarding matters surrounding MJ's 'death' TS merely dismisses this by saying "You will find connections which are merely coincidence, because you are browsing through an almost endless sea (multi-contextual research) of opportunities for a coincidence." As to "what makes more sense" - it doesn't make sense at all to base your opinion on another person's personal assumptions, interpretations and accusations while FACTS are being presented. Instead of letting yourself being led to think into a certain direction, you should think for yourself.[/b]
LovelyLurker wrote: Dearest Souza and Mo....it saddens me to see things between you both are so horrible.I remember the days on the old MJHD when you two were the best of friends and danced around your living rooms after having discovered something that made you both so very excited. At one time I wondered if you were sisters your ideas were that close. I remember the both of you together pouring your hearts and souls into researching ideas you both had and spending sooo much time posting these ideas and always backing up what you had to say. And you did this together.I remember you were two of the most passionate people on the board regarding this hoax and went so far as to create this forum because you were so afraid everything would be gone and you would lose all your freinds when the other forum went down for a day or 2 and then you kept this here. I remember when all hell broke loose with some of your theories and with other members and you defended each other like you were family. I don't know what really happened but it saddens me to see you like this with each other. I also remember when you used to do interviews - together- like one voice.It really upsets me and I hope that perhaps this post can help you see how you both were in the beginning and take some time away and perhaps talk, things have been said and the hurt may be too deep but try for 1 minute to remember how you were in the beginning. So fresh, so excited, so exuberant, so full of ideas so ready to take on this HOAX together.
You are right, and my question is, is going to continue this forum with this situation among managers?
Perhaps someone can help me out since this has all become so gray and bleak.So, if there are insiders involved who are they? Is TS a known insider? If so, why can one not reveal his identity?Also, I understand, if I read Souza's earlier post correctly, that she has acted as a poser before. Have you on this forum, Souza? I still question if you are aware of the identities of the following characters, as all left under peculiar circumstances:Call of the WildPoetry in MotionTumic ShasonI am sure there are others that are not coming to mind right now.Can you reveal the truth to the identity of any of the characters who were chased from the forum?You have also alluded to the fact that Michael has been on the forum. Do you know that to be fact? Or, is that an assumption/intuitive feeling? I cannot help but question the stability of the forum when I see in-fighting, particularly between the administrators. Descension rarely brings about positive results. Is the objective of the forum truly to discover the reasons for the "death" hoax of Michael J. Jackson? Has that now shifted? Or, have you been privy to further information that none of us have? Could the demise of the forum be in-timing with a return? Or, has the ugly head of reality finally been reared, as frustrations have been mounting and we still have yet to come to any concrete answers to our summations. It is human nature to see the fall of any civilization, or community, for that matter, when cohesion is lost.
Back to my very interesting investigations now. As soon as I have new outcomes I will post them so everyone can make up his own mind, and maybe we can discuss some of these interesting subjects all together again.
Also, I understand, if I read Souza's earlier post correctly, that she has acted as a poser before. Have you on this forum, Souza? I still question if you are aware of the identities of the following characters, as all left under peculiar circumstances:Call of the WildPoetry in MotionTumic ShasonI am sure there are others that are not coming to mind right now.Can you reveal the truth to the identity of any of the characters who were chased from the forum?You have also alluded to the fact that Michael has been on the forum. Do you know that to be fact? Or, is that an assumption/intuitive feeling? I cannot help but question the stability of the forum when I see in-fighting, particularly between the administrators. Descension rarely brings about positive results. Is the objective of the forum truly to discover the reasons for the "death" hoax of Michael J. Jackson? Has that now shifted? Or, have you been privy to further information that none of us have? Could the demise of the forum be in-timing with a return? Or, has the ugly head of reality finally been reared, as frustrations have been mounting and we still have yet to come to any concrete answers to our summations. It is human nature to see the fall of any civilization, or community, for that matter, when cohesion is lost.
I speak for myself only. But it's difficult to believe that after everything that's been said and not said, that this forum can go on as usual and certainly not as before the "TIAI update #6.5. At a minimum, the credibility of the site has been damaged but more than that I question the ability of the moderators to lead any kind of meaningful exchange of ideas or investigation.Maybe it's time to regroup. I don't know what that looks like but I think we are all being naive if we think that this hasn't changed things.