0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Ask yourself, why can't back just be MJ? It's really the easy answer... so what stops people from embracing the obvious truth?I honestly think people are afraid to believe.
I searched and I found the link to that thread on MJJC....It's interesting to read the reactions... when I have time.... You are not allowed to view links. Register or LoginGina I saw you there
here are some of the questions I ask myself whenever I think of someone other than Michael as back:Who has detailed knowledge of MJs business/legal/financial affairs?Who would conceive of the New 7 Day Theory?Who would write about these things so creatively?Who would sound so pushed-over-the-edge in those posts about traces of coke in MJs underwear?Who would talk about every aspect of MJs life except his children?Who would know so much about MJs life, post about it with real passion, genuine emotion, and not react to his death, or “death'? Who would continue until June 22 2010 defending Katherine, at times sounding almost like an hysterical child - “leave my mother alone!!!”I can only think of one person.One of the MJJC mods confirmed to someone I know that Michael had at least one account at MJJC.
You are not allowed to view links. Register or LoginAsk yourself, why can't back just be MJ? It's really the easy answer... so what stops people from embracing the obvious truth?I honestly think people are afraid to believe.Because they can't make peace with that idea, because it's a crash of their illusions, for they imagined MJ as a different person -- obviously more refined...Back is too earthy and imperfect, he's fooling around, he may be hysterical, he's cursing, he doesn't say 'god bless you', he is not understandable and so on. So he just can't be MJ!!! :icon_lol:
It's so THRILLING to know that Michael was around fans forums for so long and that most probably he is on this forum too! :icon_bounce:Even if I have this feeling for quite a while now, I still can't get over the excitement ....Back's posts are precious!! such a good evidence of how he was always around his fans, guiding them , even revealing in a coded style, his life-time project!What artists does this? Nobody else! Michael is just UNIQUE!! and his fans are the luckiest and most privileged for he always included us into his plans and adventures!!!To be part of this ...it's just as if he had invited us on his Neverland carousels.... virtually, but still he's with us!! means a lot!!I am just so happy!! i can't even describe how I feel.I think I'll just say: Michael I LOVE you! :bearhug:
You are not allowed to view links. Register or LoginYou are not allowed to view links. Register or LoginVeronica - OJ has said in interviews that Michael invited him and his children to Neverland after the trial so that they could enjoy time outsideof the prying eyes of the media. I don't think MJ was there but he and Michael would have talked. Is it possiblethat he told Michael who killed Nicole? Maybe the son confessed to Michael? Or, maybe one of the attorneys - but then that is breakingconfidentiality. I've been interested as well how BACK seems so confident in that piece of information. :icon_rolleyes: You actually believe "the greatest" would invite a man with his children at his ranch to recover after a hard period in their lives, they tell him that dark secret and then Michael goes undercover on MJJC and reveals it to all...?Nooo...LOL - put like that the answer would be "no". I didn't think so anyway but thought I'd try to throw some ideas out there.Then it begs the question - does BACK know for sure what he's saying about OJ's son or is it a guess? Even though I don't know exactly what Michael would do I'm pretty sure he wouldn't falsely accuse someone of a crime like that without proof....so, is BACK not Michael or does Michael know something, and if so, how would he know?Blessings
You are not allowed to view links. Register or LoginVeronica - OJ has said in interviews that Michael invited him and his children to Neverland after the trial so that they could enjoy time outsideof the prying eyes of the media. I don't think MJ was there but he and Michael would have talked. Is it possiblethat he told Michael who killed Nicole? Maybe the son confessed to Michael? Or, maybe one of the attorneys - but then that is breakingconfidentiality. I've been interested as well how BACK seems so confident in that piece of information. :icon_rolleyes: You actually believe "the greatest" would invite a man with his children at his ranch to recover after a hard period in their lives, they tell him that dark secret and then Michael goes undercover on MJJC and reveals it to all...?Nooo...
Veronica - OJ has said in interviews that Michael invited him and his children to Neverland after the trial so that they could enjoy time outsideof the prying eyes of the media. I don't think MJ was there but he and Michael would have talked. Is it possiblethat he told Michael who killed Nicole? Maybe the son confessed to Michael? Or, maybe one of the attorneys - but then that is breakingconfidentiality. I've been interested as well how BACK seems so confident in that piece of information.
You are not allowed to view links. Register or LoginYou are not allowed to view links. Register or LoginYou are not allowed to view links. Register or LoginVeronica - OJ has said in interviews that Michael invited him and his children to Neverland after the trial so that they could enjoy time outsideof the prying eyes of the media. I don't think MJ was there but he and Michael would have talked. Is it possiblethat he told Michael who killed Nicole? Maybe the son confessed to Michael? Or, maybe one of the attorneys - but then that is breakingconfidentiality. I've been interested as well how BACK seems so confident in that piece of information. :icon_rolleyes: You actually believe "the greatest" would invite a man with his children at his ranch to recover after a hard period in their lives, they tell him that dark secret and then Michael goes undercover on MJJC and reveals it to all...?Nooo...LOL - put like that the answer would be "no". I didn't think so anyway but thought I'd try to throw some ideas out there.Then it begs the question - does BACK know for sure what he's saying about OJ's son or is it a guess? Even though I don't know exactly what Michael would do I'm pretty sure he wouldn't falsely accuse someone of a crime like that without proof....so, is BACK not Michael or does Michael know something, and if so, how would he know?BlessingsI was watching the O Riley Factor I beleive it was on the 4/4 and he was interviewing a man named William Dear who has written a book called OJ is Innocent and he said that he had the muder weapon which was in OJ's son storage unit he even showed it on television and said it matches the wounds that was found on Nicole Simpsons body. He claims he has tried numerous times to get in touch with the LA cops but they keeps being putting him off like they are not interested . ORiley says he is going to get in touch with them for him but he seems to be skeptical. I would put a link to the show if I knew how, but you can go onto the ORiley Factor web site and it will show you the interview. Just thought this was interesting after reading this discussion.Blessings to all and Happy Easter