0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Guys, this does not make AEG look good in the eyes of the public. The reason I say this is because what does the Paternity of the Kids got to do with Michael" Wrongful death" what kind of light are they trying to show to the juror. I was once a juror for a case that involve drugs and weapons and the person that was being charged was at the wrong place at the wrong time. The Prosecutor Lawyer tried bringing up the issue about the guy seeing another guy while his fiancée was in the courtroom. The reason the guy was at the wrong place at the wrong time was because he had an argument with his girlfriend regarding another girl. This was not relevant to the case and therefore the jurors did not take so kindly to what the Prosecuting Lawyer was doing. AEG can bring up all the "Dirty Secrets" that they think they have on Michael and it would only make them look stupid. Because it will not be relevant to the case. They will need to stick the facts at hand regarding them not knowing that Michael was not healthy and let the kids out of this. And I think that it is very unwise and very stupid part of AEG to bring that up in court. This will definitely not go good for them at all.
ok wait a minute , none of this stuff has actually come up in court right? :icon_e_confused:
You are not allowed to view links. Register or LoginGuys, this does not make AEG look good in the eyes of the public. The reason I say this is because what does the Paternity of the Kids got to do with Michael" Wrongful death" what kind of light are they trying to show to the juror. I was once a juror for a case that involve drugs and weapons and the person that was being charged was at the wrong place at the wrong time. The Prosecutor Lawyer tried bringing up the issue about the guy seeing another guy while his fiancée was in the courtroom. The reason the guy was at the wrong place at the wrong time was because he had an argument with his girlfriend regarding another girl. This was not relevant to the case and therefore the jurors did not take so kindly to what the Prosecuting Lawyer was doing. AEG can bring up all the "Dirty Secrets" that they think they have on Michael and it would only make them look stupid. Because it will not be relevant to the case. They will need to stick the facts at hand regarding them not knowing that Michael was not healthy and let the kids out of this. And I think that it is very unwise and very stupid part of AEG to bring that up in court. This will definitely not go good for them at all. Exactly. It's the same when during this week the judge stopped the questioning and was forced to say a few stern words to Randy Phillips about the way he was answering questions asked by Panish. The judge said to him if you don't know the answer to a question just say so, but the judge continued that the way he was avoiding answering the questions and when he did answer he was contradicting himself, that he was not helping his case at all.But people who are guilty of wrongdoing whatever that may be, are usually doing anything they can including lying and playing ugly to cover their behindsthat they lose credibility in the public's and jurors eyes. I believe That's what's happening here, and Gongaware did the same thing when he was testifying before Phillips. Just look at the words TMZ used to describe their treatment of Michael: A circus animal!!!!"Short story ... Propofol aside, if the jury believes AEG unreasonably pushed MJ like a circus animal, they could be in beaucoup trouble."Here is the link to that article:You are not allowed to view links. Register or LoginYou are not allowed to view links. Register or Loginok wait a minute , none of this stuff has actually come up in court right? :icon_e_confused:suspicious, I believe it was before the trial had started or in the beginning, there was an article that said that AEG has undisputed proof that Michael is not the biological father of Prince and Paris and they will prove this in court, and Katherine had responded by asking the judge not to allow the paternity to be brought up in court since it has nothing to do with how he "died", but the judge allowed it to be brought up. Th
From where they get so much shit :icon_question:
I swore to myself never to get involved in any chat about the kids paternity ... but I got to say this ... I'm sorry but I have always believed that Paris is Michael's biological daughter .... she has the very same skin tone as my son, the same natural hair colour as my son .... I like Debbie Row, am very pale skinned, with blue eyes and blonde hair, my sons father, is the same skin tone as Michael, (before the vitaligo) maybe a little lighter, and he has jet black hair like Michael ... my son did not get his dad's brown eyes, he has pearcing green eyes!! ... so NO ONE can predict the skin tone of a mixed child or eye colour ... but what really convinced me she was Michael's daughter? .. look at her eyes and your looking right into papa joe's eyes!! ... and that's all im gonna say on the subject lol :0) apart from I believe this is just tabloid heroin ready to be pumped into all the tabloid junky believers !!