Some of the odd things at trial & outside courthouse so far

[julia142]

Our Christopher Rogers an actor, producer, writer, cameraman?
 
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
 
Could this be him?
 
Again a name in the court that is on IMDB and there is no picture of this man on Imdb to know. And look at the film ''Pursuit of Happiness'' it cited his name as Christopher Roger, so it is the same name though...
 
And for Dr. Alon Steinberg we have a AlAn Steinbeirg on IMDB: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login He is a music composer for animated movies...
Here is the page for our cardiologist, he sure changed a lot since that picture: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
 
We also have a Stephen Marx on IMDB with no picture: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
 
So, I don't know if it's them, coulb or could not be but a lot of names in this trial seems to be connected to movies and music...

[julia142]

Thank you pepper, that's what jumps into my eyes:
the same day the U.S. deficit reach highest ever level, Ben Bernanke is getting reaffirmed in his job.
 

• August 25, 2009 The United States budget deficit for 2009 will reach $1.6 trillion, the highest ever recorded.
  

• August 25, 2009 U.S. President Barack Obama nominates Ben Bernanke for his second term as chairman of the Federal Reserve.

You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login

I find this very interesting considering the Federal Reserve is NOT a government agency.
On a s**ty note - we hear so much pee talk in court but nada on da poop. Not to be gross but there is no mention of any testing. Surely there would be some fecal matter, especially if he had 3 jars of pee in him.  Is MJ too shy to add in this detail?
Anyway, according to Henry C. Lee, forensics expert who assisted law enforcement in over 6, 000 major criminal crime investigations, including O. J. Simpson, states an analysis is done on the properties and effects of serums (blood, semen, saliva, swear, fecal matter), this is called serology. I need to have another look through the bogus AR to see what's listed under this section.

 
 
 
 

   You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login 26 mins 13 secs ago You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login  Full Moon Tonight!! Me And My Pack Of Unicorns Will Go Galloping Tonight. You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
 

 
 
 
  The Great Moon HoaxDuring the final week of August 1835, a long article appeared in serial form on the front page of the New York Sun. It bore the headline:

 

GREAT ASTRONOMICAL DISCOVERIES LATELY MADE BY SIR JOHN HERSCHEL, L.L.D. F.R.S. &c. At the Cape of Good Hope [From Supplement to the Edinburgh Journal of Science]   GREAT ASTRONOMICAL DISCOVERIES LATELY MADE BY SIR JOHN HERSCHEL, L.L.D. F.R.S. &c. At the Cape of Good Hope [From Supplement to the Edinburgh Journal of Science] You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login The article began by triumphantly listing a series of stunning astronomical breakthroughs that the famous British astronomer, You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login, had apparently made "by means of a telescope of vast dimensions and an entirely new principle." Herschel, the article declared, had established a "new theory of cometary phenomena"; he had discovered planets in other solar systems; and he had "solved or corrected nearly every leading problem of mathematical astronomy." Then, almost as if it were an afterthought, the article revealed Herschel's final, stunning achievement: he had discovered life on the moon! The article continued on and offered an elaborate account of the fantastic sights viewed by Herschel during his telescopic observation of the moon. It described a lunar topography that included vast forests, inland seas, and lilac-hued quartz pyramids. Readers learned that herds of You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login wandered across the plains of the moon; that blue unicorns perched on its hilltops; and that spherical, amphibious creatures rolled across its beaches. The highpoint of the narrative came when it revealed that Herschel had found evidence of intelligent life on the moon: he had discovered both a primitive tribe of You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login, and a race of winged humans living in pastoral harmony around a mysterious, golden-roofed temple. Herschel dubbed these latter creatures the You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login or "man-bat". The article, of course, was an elaborate hoax. Herschel had not really observed life on the moon, nor had he accomplished any of the other astronomical breakthroughs credited to him in the article. In fact, Herschel was not even aware until much later that such discoveries had been attributed to him. However, the New York Sun managed to sell thousands of copies of the article before the public realized that it had been hoaxed   Although the Sun managed to sell many copies of the moon hoax, it is not clear whether people at the time actually believed the story, or simply found it to be an entertaining topic of debate. Various eyewitnesses to the hoax assure us that the credulity was general. For instance, one reporter, writing 18 years after the event, recalled how the hoax was received at Yale College: Yale College was alive with staunch supporters. The literati—students and professors, doctors in divinity and law—and all the rest of the reading community, looked daily for the arrival of the New York mail with unexampled avidity and implicit faith. Have you seen the accounts of Sir John Herschel's wonderful discoveries? Have you read the Sun? Have you heard the news of the man in the Moon? These were the questions that met you every where. It was the absorbing topic of the day. Nobody expressed or entertained a doubt as to the truth of the story. However, many discussions of the hoax that appeared in papers at the time of its first publication were openly skeptical of it. For instance, on August 29, 1835 the New York Commercial Advertiser had this to say about the hoax: It is well done, and makes a pleasant piece of reading enough, especially for such as have a sufficient stock of available credulity; but we can hardly understand how any man of common sense should read it without at once perceiving the deception. Without referring to the monstrosities of the story itself, can any one suppose for a moment that such preparations as are described, should have been made without a word of notice in the english papers? Preparations going on for years—an object of glass of twenty-four feet in diameter—a donation of ten thousand pounds by the king—consultations with Sir David Brewster—and other extravagancies not less preposterous   Authorship of the hoax is usually attributed to You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login, a Cambridge-educated reporter who was working for the Sun. However, Locke never publicly admitted to being the author of the hoax, and rumors have persisted that others were also involved in the production of the story. Two men in particular have been mentioned in connection with the hoax: Jean-Nicolas Nicollet, a French astronomer who was travelling through America at the time (though he was in Mississippi, not New York, when the moon hoax appeared), and Lewis Gaylord Clark, editor of the Knickerbocker Magazine. However, there is no real evidence to suggest that anyone but Locke was the author of the hoax. Despite the intense public speculation about the moon story, the Sun never publicly conceded that it was a hoax. On September 16, 1835 the Sun did publish a column in which it discussed the possibility that the story was a hoax, but it never confessed to anything. Quite the contrary. It wrote that, "Certain correspondents have been urging us to come out and confess the whole to be a hoax; but this we can by no means do, until we have the testimony of the English or Scotch papers to corroborate such a declaration." This is the closest the Sun ever came to an admission of guilt. You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login   You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login   Day One: Tuesday Morning, August 25, 1835 GREAT ASTRONOMICAL DISCOVERIES Lately Made BY SIR JOHN HERSCHEL, L.L.D, F.R.S, &c. At The Cape of Good Hope. [From Supplement to the Edinburgh Journal of Science]

I knew Paris Tweet was attached to it! 

[voiceforthesilent]

Our Christopher Rogers an actor, producer, writer, cameraman?
 
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
 
Could this be him?
 
Again a name in the court that is on IMDB and there is no picture of this man on Imdb to know. And look at the film ''Pursuit of Happiness'' it cited his name as Christopher Roger, so it is the same name though...
 
And for Dr. Alon Steinberg we have a AlAn Steinbeirg on IMDB: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login He is a music composer for animated movies...
Here is the page for our cardiologist, he sure changed a lot since that picture: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
 
We also have a Stephen Marx on IMDB with no picture: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
 
So, I don't know if it's them, coulb or could not be but a lot of names in this trial seems to be connected to movies and music...

This is great, Julia - thanks

I guess we (in our spare time) need to go watch some of these movies to see the faces behind the names.

It's not unthinkable that there are real physicians by these names but for this hoax they are being played by actors. But I would think these real physicians might need to know even if their names are spelled slightly different. Just thinking out loud...

Blessings

[MJonmind]

 I don't remember seeing this Chris Rogers, but I absolutely loved The Pursuit of Happiness, with Will Smith, about determination, homelessness, financial struggles, father-son relationship.

[everlastinglove_MJ]

Christopher Rogers....( Michael? Prince? or a "real person")
 
I didn't know if this should be a new thread topic or not...so I'll mention it here
 
It came up in chat that some people felt the witness Christopher Rogers could have been Michael or perhaps even Prince in disguise. Some people even felt that his movements, hands, speech etc...were like that of Michaels, or possibly Prince.

At first I dismissed it as too far fetched until I saw the photo of Michael in Jermaine's book "You are not alone" disguised as "Uncle Willy" (I personally never would have known it was MJ!). And we know Michael has had a history of being in disguises.

Here's the picture of Michael as "Uncle Willy" that I am referring to...and one of Christopher Rogers. 

Anyone else think this is possible or is this a dead end pursuit?
 
 

I think it's possible

[msgitm]

Thank you pepper, that's what jumps into my eyes:
the same day the U.S. deficit reach highest ever level, Ben Bernanke is getting reaffirmed in his job.

• August 25, 2009 The United States budget deficit for 2009 will reach $1.6 trillion, the highest ever recorded.
  

• August 25, 2009 U.S. President Barack Obama nominates Ben Bernanke for his second term as chairman of the Federal Reserve.

You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login

I find this very interesting considering the Federal Reserve is NOT a government agency.
On a s**ty note - we hear so much pee talk in court but nada on da poop. Not to be gross but there is no mention of any testing. Surely there would be some fecal matter, especially if he had 3 jars of pee in him.  Is MJ too shy to add in this detail?
Anyway, according to Henry C. Lee, forensics expert who assisted law enforcement in over 6, 000 major criminal crime investigations, including O. J. Simpson, states an analysis is done on the properties and effects of serums (blood, semen, saliva, swear, fecal matter), this is called serology. I need to have another look through the bogus AR to see what's listed under this section.

Case in point - "nada on da poop".  Dr Steven Shafer (Propofol expert) said in court today that the Propofol, after doing it's job, would then go through the liver and exit through the bladder (urine) and the bowel (poop). So where’s da poop? I don’t recall any testing done on his bowel contents, yet clearly there would be traces of drugs in there. Again, not to be disgusting but it’s an obvious question.  Especially after hearing Dr Shafer's comment confirming this. 
 

[YouRnotAlone7]

On day 11 during the Alon Steinburg questioning, didn't anyone else notice the flashlight between the cop's legs behind the defense?
 OMG!

[applehead250609]

GRACE:Another oddity is this.

ktla published on their blog the following information:

Quote
Anesthesiologist Puts Focus on Safety at Conrad Murray Trial
11:10 AM  September 28, 2011



One of the stranger sights you'll see outside the Conrad Murray trial is a guy wearing surgical scrubs and a doctor's white coat.   He's got an IV drip attached to a bag of white liquid, just like you'd see in a hospital. That guy is Newport Beach anesthesiologist Dr. Barry Friedberg, who's written a book on anesthesia safety called "Getting Over Going Under".
Friedberg has real propofol to show you... It's the white liquid in the IV.  He's also got bottles of the drug.
Propofol is the powerful anesthetic that Michael Jackson used to refer to as his "milk."
Friedberg says hospital patients need to ask tougher questions to their anesthesiologists.

You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login


This is falsifying facts?
Dr. Friedberg was outside the courthouse on occasion of the hearing on January 4, 2011.
Anybody saw him later than this date?

Grace I saw this man a couple of time on internet,and now I remember that I saw him In Session's Ryan Smith.He said to Ryan that  he was asked to testify for MURRAY ,but he clealy said NO !!!! respect/ .LOVE you!!!!

IN SESSION - Dr. Barry Friedberg approached by Murray's DEFENSE TEAM.mp4
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Es5suvGQOj4&feature=channel_video_title[/youtube]

[applehead250609]

someone here said that LIVE streamings from inside the court are allowed only to InSession and that for OJ Simpson the InSession sign appeared on the transmission. I don't see InSession in any of the live streamings of his trial, nor on any other trial streaming on InSession site.

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ldZ-Fv0uhxQ[/youtube]

Anna thank you for the video!!!!! I have a QUESTION here.What is that black man behind Johnny Cochram is doing at OJ SIMSPON trial???  afraid/ afraid/
That man I saw him at Murray trial and he is ALVAREZ lawyer.In those video he is speaking about THE CREAM Michael was using.And one more thing,it is just me or Alvarez is almost crying  /??

La Toya Jackson: 'It's Difficult to See Dr. Conrad Murray'
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PyPLwLTeqAM&feature=channel_video_title[/youtube]

Conrad Murray Trial
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-uZczrWFsCM&feature=channel_video_title[/youtube]

And one more courious thing,this man,Carl Douglas was also involved in 1993-2005 case molestation of Michael.Isn't this strange???  :roll: lolol/

LOVE

[applehead250609]

On day 11 during the Alon Steinburg questioning, didn't anyone else notice the flashlight between the cop's legs behind the defense?
 OMG!

 /bravo/
   :lol: :lol:

[Andrea]

Thank you pepper, that's what jumps into my eyes:
the same day the U.S. deficit reach highest ever level, Ben Bernanke is getting reaffirmed in his job.

• August 25, 2009 The United States budget deficit for 2009 will reach $1.6 trillion, the highest ever recorded.
  

• August 25, 2009 U.S. President Barack Obama nominates Ben Bernanke for his second term as chairman of the Federal Reserve.

You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login

I find this very interesting considering the Federal Reserve is NOT a government agency.On a s**ty note - we hear so much pee talk in court but nada on da poop. Not to be gross but there is no mention of any testing. Surely there would be some fecal matter, especially if he had 3 jars of pee in him.  Is MJ too shy to add in this detail?Anyway, according to Henry C. Lee, forensics expert who assisted law enforcement in over 6, 000 major criminal crime investigations, including O. J. Simpson, states an analysis is done on the properties and effects of serums (blood, semen, saliva, swear, fecal matter), this is called serology. I need to have another look through the bogus AR to see what's listed under this section.

Case in point - "nada on da poop".  Dr Steven Shafer (Propofol expert) said in court today that the Propofol, after doing it's job, would then go through the liver and exit through the bladder (urine) and the bowel (poop). So where’s da poop? I don’t recall any testing done on his bowel contents, yet clearly there would be traces of drugs in there. Again, not to be disgusting but it’s an obvious question.  Especially after hearing Dr Shafer's comment confirming this. 

I think something went wrong when you quoted, I didn't write the text in red.  I don't see what I wrote at all, LOL.

[voiceforthesilent]

On day 11 during the Alon Steinburg questioning, didn't anyone else notice the flashlight between the cop's legs behind the defense?

That does seem odd, doesn't it? At the very least it doesn't look professional. But, why would he need the flashlight? It wasn't night time. Perhaps to represent shining light on a subject or matter? IDK...thank you for bringing this up.

Yesterday and the day before I noticed something gray and fuzzy on the judges desk. I couldn't make out what it was. Did anyone else notice this?

Applehead - when I saw your post regarding that attorney it felt as though Michael told Alberto what attorney to have represent him. It also seems odd that the same people keep showing up, right?


Grace and Applehead - do you think that the anesthesiologist is for real? I think he is and that he decided to set some facts straight to the public regarding propofol. Remember how people were very nervous about propofol after June 25, 2009.

Blessings!

[msgitm]

On day 11 during the Alon Steinburg questioning, didn't anyone else notice the flashlight between the cop's legs behind the defense?
 OMG!

Police flashlights are also a weapon.  I do know this first hand.  They are very heavy and can be used as a billy-club.

[msgitm]

someone here said that LIVE streamings from inside the court are allowed only to InSession and that for OJ Simpson the InSession sign appeared on the transmission. I don't see InSession in any of the live streamings of his trial, nor on any other trial streaming on InSession site.

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ldZ-Fv0uhxQ[/youtube]

Anna thank you for the video!!!!! I have a QUESTION here.What is that black man behind Johnny Cochram is doing at OJ SIMSPON trial???  afraid/ afraid/
That man I saw him at Murray trial and he is ALVAREZ lawyer.In those video he is speaking about THE CREAM Michael was using.And one more thing,it is just me or Alvarez is almost crying  / ??

La Toya Jackson: 'It's Difficult to See Dr. Conrad Murray'
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PyPLwLTeqAM&feature=channel_video_title[/youtube]

Conrad Murray Trial
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-uZczrWFsCM&feature=channel_video_title[/youtube]

And one more courious thing,this man,Carl Douglas was also involved in 1993-2005 case molestation of Michael.Isn't this strange???  :roll: lolol/

LOVE

That is strange! And why would he need such a high powered lawyer?
btw, a Jackson nephew/grandson (who is also Katherine's driver) told CNN that Dr Murray did not comfort the kids or Kat at the hospital. Supposedly Kat barely saw him.

[fordtocarr]

 party/ What about that clown outside???  JVM said this trial certainty has the feel of a circus.
She didn't want the clown to get close to her!!  lol  Maybe Michael was there   Either way a clown at a death trial of the most famous man if the world??  On HLN they've calling the trial, a DRAMA, said Murray's interview was definitely SCRIPTED.  They've called it a SET.  They had the picture of the fake state seal of Cali on their set.  AND...they are really defending Michael on this.  Perhaps they have elusive 24/7 coverage to GAIN viewers, yes, but to me these things really tell me they are a part of all this.