0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
I'll give the vid creator an "A" for an interesting vid:) Other than that I'm not putting much thought into July of next year.I'm not as familiar as many of you are with vid games & such, nor the "face" of the person in the "V" video. I am sure many of you have seen pictures of Prince with the same mask,..yes? That is the only relevance that I have seen on the net.
Quote from: "jacilovesmichael"Don't know what to think. I can see everyone's point of view. A couple things I will mention- I disagree with Hollywood not being a good choice. I think it would be a good choice for something like this to reveal what Hollywood really is - a bunch of lies. I do agree with Souza though that it looks pretty dangerous. Another thing is the numerology within the date. One thing I keep in mind is that both MJ's birth date and 'death' date reduce to the number 6:Birth - August 29, 1958 - 8+2+9+1+9+5+8 = 42 and 4+2 = 6'Death' - June 25, 2009 - 6+2+5+2+9= 24 and 2+4 = 6Coincidence? Perhaps. But I have kept this in the back of my mind when dates come up. I don't think it's necessary to focus too much on the "when", as I've said before, because the reasons for the hoax are much more important. However, I think it's reasonable to guess that the "BAM" date could be a date that also reduces to a 6 because that would give us the number 666, which represents the things this hoax is meant to expose. July 13, 2011 - 7+1+3+2+1+1=15 and 1+5= 6Of course, this numerology is no secret and is available to anyone, so whoever made this video could have made it with that in mind and chosen the date accordingly as to trick the "hoaxers". Unfortunately I feel that may be likely. The date could also be a mere coincidence. I agree with Souza, MJ doesn't need to copy someone. Of course he was inspired by many people, events, movies, and literature. But whatever he does is going to be unlike anything that has ever been done before. You can count on that.I disagree with you on both the birth date and the death date. The death date for obvious reasons, and IMO his birth date makes 999:Quote from: "~Souza~"Ok, I'm gonna throw this out again:I don't have access to the report now, but I'll try to recall what I know and check later on but I think this is pretty much what the report said:Intelius shows us:Michael J. Jackson - California - Katherine and some others from the family as relativesMike J. Jackson - California - Katherine and some others from the family as relativesThere is more than one DOB listed, because there are more people with those names. There is only one DOB they both have in common: January 28, 1960. Now let's list some things:In 1969 when Mike was supposed to be 11, he had to tell people he was 9, for PR reasons (I guess you are way cuter at 9, because you are darn old at 11.. :S )... Look at the video below, it's from 1968. Is he 10 or 8 there? IMO maybe 10, more likely 8, going on 9.[youtube:39nrt1dy]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ux3joe0GdTA[/youtube:39nrt1dy]When you pay close attention while watching The Jacksons - An American Dream (produced by Jermaine!!) you will notice that Katherine gets pregnant with Mike in 1959. Well you can try but it's impossible in that case to give birth in 1958. (btw: at birth she names him Michael Joe, not Joseph).Then we had this:Quote01/28/2010 at 08:30 am in department 5at 111 North Hill Street, Los Angeles, CA 90012Revocation of WillHmmmm, turning 50 would be a good time to have your will revoked, don't you think?It's not like there is a sibling 'in the way'. Marlon David Jackson (born March 12, 1957), Steven Randall "Randy" Jackson (born October 29, 1961). So both dates are possible, there is quite a gap between Marlon and Randy, considering the fact that the older siblings had way less time in between.The indictment of 2003. Although the whole world knows his DOB, it's blocked out:Make up your own mind about it, but my bet is that the moment the world learned his name was Michael Joseph Jackson, born August 29, 1958, a hoax was already in the planning.You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login[/color]
Don't know what to think. I can see everyone's point of view. A couple things I will mention- I disagree with Hollywood not being a good choice. I think it would be a good choice for something like this to reveal what Hollywood really is - a bunch of lies. I do agree with Souza though that it looks pretty dangerous. Another thing is the numerology within the date. One thing I keep in mind is that both MJ's birth date and 'death' date reduce to the number 6:Birth - August 29, 1958 - 8+2+9+1+9+5+8 = 42 and 4+2 = 6'Death' - June 25, 2009 - 6+2+5+2+9= 24 and 2+4 = 6Coincidence? Perhaps. But I have kept this in the back of my mind when dates come up. I don't think it's necessary to focus too much on the "when", as I've said before, because the reasons for the hoax are much more important. However, I think it's reasonable to guess that the "BAM" date could be a date that also reduces to a 6 because that would give us the number 666, which represents the things this hoax is meant to expose. July 13, 2011 - 7+1+3+2+1+1=15 and 1+5= 6Of course, this numerology is no secret and is available to anyone, so whoever made this video could have made it with that in mind and chosen the date accordingly as to trick the "hoaxers". Unfortunately I feel that may be likely. The date could also be a mere coincidence. I agree with Souza, MJ doesn't need to copy someone. Of course he was inspired by many people, events, movies, and literature. But whatever he does is going to be unlike anything that has ever been done before. You can count on that.
Ok, I'm gonna throw this out again:I don't have access to the report now, but I'll try to recall what I know and check later on but I think this is pretty much what the report said:Intelius shows us:Michael J. Jackson - California - Katherine and some others from the family as relativesMike J. Jackson - California - Katherine and some others from the family as relativesThere is more than one DOB listed, because there are more people with those names. There is only one DOB they both have in common: January 28, 1960. Now let's list some things:In 1969 when Mike was supposed to be 11, he had to tell people he was 9, for PR reasons (I guess you are way cuter at 9, because you are darn old at 11.. :S )... Look at the video below, it's from 1968. Is he 10 or 8 there? IMO maybe 10, more likely 8, going on 9.[youtube:39nrt1dy]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ux3joe0GdTA[/youtube:39nrt1dy]When you pay close attention while watching The Jacksons - An American Dream (produced by Jermaine!!) you will notice that Katherine gets pregnant with Mike in 1959. Well you can try but it's impossible in that case to give birth in 1958. (btw: at birth she names him Michael Joe, not Joseph).Then we had this:Quote01/28/2010 at 08:30 am in department 5at 111 North Hill Street, Los Angeles, CA 90012Revocation of WillHmmmm, turning 50 would be a good time to have your will revoked, don't you think?It's not like there is a sibling 'in the way'. Marlon David Jackson (born March 12, 1957), Steven Randall "Randy" Jackson (born October 29, 1961). So both dates are possible, there is quite a gap between Marlon and Randy, considering the fact that the older siblings had way less time in between.The indictment of 2003. Although the whole world knows his DOB, it's blocked out:Make up your own mind about it, but my bet is that the moment the world learned his name was Michael Joseph Jackson, born August 29, 1958, a hoax was already in the planning.You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login[/color]
01/28/2010 at 08:30 am in department 5at 111 North Hill Street, Los Angeles, CA 90012Revocation of Will
Quote from: "ER911"I'll give the vid creator an "A" for an interesting vid:) Other than that I'm not putting much thought into July of next year.I'm not as familiar as many of you are with vid games & such, nor the "face" of the person in the "V" video. I am sure many of you have seen pictures of Prince with the same mask,..yes? That is the only relevance that I have seen on the net.November that shall never, ever be forgot. [/i]please watch the movie or just read the wikipedia article, i am sure you will find many similarities!> comics You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login> movie You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login)
Quote from: "~Souza~"Quote from: "jacilovesmichael"Don't know what to think. I can see everyone's point of view. A couple things I will mention- I disagree with Hollywood not being a good choice. I think it would be a good choice for something like this to reveal what Hollywood really is - a bunch of lies. I do agree with Souza though that it looks pretty dangerous. Another thing is the numerology within the date. One thing I keep in mind is that both MJ's birth date and 'death' date reduce to the number 6:Birth - August 29, 1958 - 8+2+9+1+9+5+8 = 42 and 4+2 = 6'Death' - June 25, 2009 - 6+2+5+2+9= 24 and 2+4 = 6Coincidence? Perhaps. But I have kept this in the back of my mind when dates come up. I don't think it's necessary to focus too much on the "when", as I've said before, because the reasons for the hoax are much more important. However, I think it's reasonable to guess that the "BAM" date could be a date that also reduces to a 6 because that would give us the number 666, which represents the things this hoax is meant to expose. July 13, 2011 - 7+1+3+2+1+1=15 and 1+5= 6Of course, this numerology is no secret and is available to anyone, so whoever made this video could have made it with that in mind and chosen the date accordingly as to trick the "hoaxers". Unfortunately I feel that may be likely. The date could also be a mere coincidence. I agree with Souza, MJ doesn't need to copy someone. Of course he was inspired by many people, events, movies, and literature. But whatever he does is going to be unlike anything that has ever been done before. You can count on that.I disagree with you on both the birth date and the death date. The death date for obvious reasons, and IMO his birth date makes 999:Quote from: "~Souza~"Ok, I'm gonna throw this out again:I don't have access to the report now, but I'll try to recall what I know and check later on but I think this is pretty much what the report said:Intelius shows us:Michael J. Jackson - California - Katherine and some others from the family as relativesMike J. Jackson - California - Katherine and some others from the family as relativesThere is more than one DOB listed, because there are more people with those names. There is only one DOB they both have in common: January 28, 1960. Now let's list some things:In 1969 when Mike was supposed to be 11, he had to tell people he was 9, for PR reasons (I guess you are way cuter at 9, because you are darn old at 11.. :S )... Look at the video below, it's from 1968. Is he 10 or 8 there? IMO maybe 10, more likely 8, going on 9.[youtube:hvo532e7]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ux3joe0GdTA[/youtube:hvo532e7]When you pay close attention while watching The Jacksons - An American Dream (produced by Jermaine!!) you will notice that Katherine gets pregnant with Mike in 1959. Well you can try but it's impossible in that case to give birth in 1958. (btw: at birth she names him Michael Joe, not Joseph).Then we had this:Quote01/28/2010 at 08:30 am in department 5at 111 North Hill Street, Los Angeles, CA 90012Revocation of WillHmmmm, turning 50 would be a good time to have your will revoked, don't you think?It's not like there is a sibling 'in the way'. Marlon David Jackson (born March 12, 1957), Steven Randall "Randy" Jackson (born October 29, 1961). So both dates are possible, there is quite a gap between Marlon and Randy, considering the fact that the older siblings had way less time in between.The indictment of 2003. Although the whole world knows his DOB, it's blocked out:Make up your own mind about it, but my bet is that the moment the world learned his name was Michael Joseph Jackson, born August 29, 1958, a hoax was already in the planning.You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login[/color]Wow that is a long quoted reply here. Do you think the reason that Jermaine portrayed Katherine pregnant in 1959 was because they had told the world Michael was younger than he actually was or do you have some other stuff to go along with that?. Do have a thread somewhere discussing this? I don't want to derail this thread. I think it is VERY interesting that the date on the court docs is blacked out. Makes no sense to me.
Quote from: "jacilovesmichael"Don't know what to think. I can see everyone's point of view. A couple things I will mention- I disagree with Hollywood not being a good choice. I think it would be a good choice for something like this to reveal what Hollywood really is - a bunch of lies. I do agree with Souza though that it looks pretty dangerous. Another thing is the numerology within the date. One thing I keep in mind is that both MJ's birth date and 'death' date reduce to the number 6:Birth - August 29, 1958 - 8+2+9+1+9+5+8 = 42 and 4+2 = 6'Death' - June 25, 2009 - 6+2+5+2+9= 24 and 2+4 = 6Coincidence? Perhaps. But I have kept this in the back of my mind when dates come up. I don't think it's necessary to focus too much on the "when", as I've said before, because the reasons for the hoax are much more important. However, I think it's reasonable to guess that the "BAM" date could be a date that also reduces to a 6 because that would give us the number 666, which represents the things this hoax is meant to expose. July 13, 2011 - 7+1+3+2+1+1=15 and 1+5= 6Of course, this numerology is no secret and is available to anyone, so whoever made this video could have made it with that in mind and chosen the date accordingly as to trick the "hoaxers". Unfortunately I feel that may be likely. The date could also be a mere coincidence. I agree with Souza, MJ doesn't need to copy someone. Of course he was inspired by many people, events, movies, and literature. But whatever he does is going to be unlike anything that has ever been done before. You can count on that.I disagree with you on both the birth date and the death date. The death date for obvious reasons, and IMO his birth date makes 999:Quote from: "~Souza~"Ok, I'm gonna throw this out again:I don't have access to the report now, but I'll try to recall what I know and check later on but I think this is pretty much what the report said:Intelius shows us:Michael J. Jackson - California - Katherine and some others from the family as relativesMike J. Jackson - California - Katherine and some others from the family as relativesThere is more than one DOB listed, because there are more people with those names. There is only one DOB they both have in common: January 28, 1960. Now let's list some things:In 1969 when Mike was supposed to be 11, he had to tell people he was 9, for PR reasons (I guess you are way cuter at 9, because you are darn old at 11.. :S )... Look at the video below, it's from 1968. Is he 10 or 8 there? IMO maybe 10, more likely 8, going on 9.[youtube:hvo532e7]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ux3joe0GdTA[/youtube:hvo532e7]When you pay close attention while watching The Jacksons - An American Dream (produced by Jermaine!!) you will notice that Katherine gets pregnant with Mike in 1959. Well you can try but it's impossible in that case to give birth in 1958. (btw: at birth she names him Michael Joe, not Joseph).Then we had this:Quote01/28/2010 at 08:30 am in department 5at 111 North Hill Street, Los Angeles, CA 90012Revocation of WillHmmmm, turning 50 would be a good time to have your will revoked, don't you think?It's not like there is a sibling 'in the way'. Marlon David Jackson (born March 12, 1957), Steven Randall "Randy" Jackson (born October 29, 1961). So both dates are possible, there is quite a gap between Marlon and Randy, considering the fact that the older siblings had way less time in between.The indictment of 2003. Although the whole world knows his DOB, it's blocked out:Make up your own mind about it, but my bet is that the moment the world learned his name was Michael Joseph Jackson, born August 29, 1958, a hoax was already in the planning.You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login[/color]
Ok, I'm gonna throw this out again:I don't have access to the report now, but I'll try to recall what I know and check later on but I think this is pretty much what the report said:Intelius shows us:Michael J. Jackson - California - Katherine and some others from the family as relativesMike J. Jackson - California - Katherine and some others from the family as relativesThere is more than one DOB listed, because there are more people with those names. There is only one DOB they both have in common: January 28, 1960. Now let's list some things:In 1969 when Mike was supposed to be 11, he had to tell people he was 9, for PR reasons (I guess you are way cuter at 9, because you are darn old at 11.. :S )... Look at the video below, it's from 1968. Is he 10 or 8 there? IMO maybe 10, more likely 8, going on 9.[youtube:hvo532e7]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ux3joe0GdTA[/youtube:hvo532e7]When you pay close attention while watching The Jacksons - An American Dream (produced by Jermaine!!) you will notice that Katherine gets pregnant with Mike in 1959. Well you can try but it's impossible in that case to give birth in 1958. (btw: at birth she names him Michael Joe, not Joseph).Then we had this:Quote01/28/2010 at 08:30 am in department 5at 111 North Hill Street, Los Angeles, CA 90012Revocation of WillHmmmm, turning 50 would be a good time to have your will revoked, don't you think?It's not like there is a sibling 'in the way'. Marlon David Jackson (born March 12, 1957), Steven Randall "Randy" Jackson (born October 29, 1961). So both dates are possible, there is quite a gap between Marlon and Randy, considering the fact that the older siblings had way less time in between.The indictment of 2003. Although the whole world knows his DOB, it's blocked out:Make up your own mind about it, but my bet is that the moment the world learned his name was Michael Joseph Jackson, born August 29, 1958, a hoax was already in the planning.You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login[/color]
Domain Name: VFORVANQUISH.COM Created on: 08-Jul-10 Expires on: 08-Jul-11 Last Updated on: 08-Jul-10 Administrative Contact: Private, Registration Domains by Proxy, Inc. DomainsByProxy.com 15111 N. Hayden Rd., Ste 160, PMB 353 Scottsdale, Arizona 85260 United States (480) 624-2599 Fax -- (480) 624-2598
Domain Name: THISISALSOIT.COM Created on: 29-Oct-09 Expires on: 29-Oct-10 Last Updated on: 22-Dec-09 Administrative Contact: Private, Registration Domains by Proxy, Inc. DomainsByProxy.com 15111 N. Hayden Rd., Ste 160, PMB 353 Scottsdale, Arizona 85260 United States (480) 624-2599 Fax -- (480) 624-2598
look at this !Quote Domain Name: VFORVANQUISH.COM Created on: 08-Jul-10 Expires on: 08-Jul-11 Last Updated on: 08-Jul-10 Administrative Contact: Private, Registration Domains by Proxy, Inc. DomainsByProxy.com 15111 N. Hayden Rd., Ste 160, PMB 353 Scottsdale, Arizona 85260 United States (480) 624-2599 Fax -- (480) 624-2598and this :Quote Domain Name: THISISALSOIT.COM Created on: 29-Oct-09 Expires on: 29-Oct-10 Last Updated on: 22-Dec-09 Administrative Contact: Private, Registration Domains by Proxy, Inc. DomainsByProxy.com 15111 N. Hayden Rd., Ste 160, PMB 353 Scottsdale, Arizona 85260 United States (480) 624-2599 Fax -- (480) 624-2598is the same person ? or i made a mistake ?
If, as is being suggested, Michael was born on 28th January, 1960, this would make him an Aquarian with the Moon also in Aquarius. Here are the characteristics of such a combination...Does this sound more like him do you think? What Souza has brought up about Michael's age and d.o.b. being altered is certainly very interesting. I'm not totally convinced, but I'm open to the possibility. Love to all x
Quote from: "emeraldcity"If, as is being suggested, Michael was born on 28th January, 1960, this would make him an Aquarian with the Moon also in Aquarius. Here are the characteristics of such a combination...Does this sound more like him do you think? What Souza has brought up about Michael's age and d.o.b. being altered is certainly very interesting. I'm not totally convinced, but I'm open to the possibility. Love to all xYeeees, Aquarian looks great to me!!Too bad, I go terrible with male aquarians :lol: (i´m aquarian btw)