Michael Jacksons Kids removed my hoax vid. from YouTube!

[L.O.V.Eispower]

WHOAA!! good onee thats unexpeccted!!

[2good2btrue]

Hooray........finally the children have a voice!!!!   Lets protect them.  MJ wanted us to protect the children, remember??        

As always, with L.O.V.E xox

[Tina K.]

wow... so, do you think it was MJ who did this? Because if it were the children, it would mean they have internet access, which was denied so often..

Do you really believe in that ? They are modern kids, not Amish kids.

[MJLover1990]

That's good that the children have done this. They have a voice and we must protect them!

[Grazzia]

they have acces to the interned offcourse,but especially Jaafar.I'm sure he knows everything whats happening on the internet.The family knows about the fan sites about the kids (especially Prince) and they enteron those sites aswell.That video was leaked by the Malkin kids (i think) and Spencer (the Malkin's daughter) knows about it as well,so offcourse the kids have and know about everything.
There are 2 other private videos on the internet (not youtube or anything that we have acces at) with Blanket.
i know  some girls that have those 2 videos.at first they wanted to realised those 2 videos on the internet but in one of the videos is one of the cousins and they decided that is not good to be realised for the sake of that cousin.
i understand that there is some sort of channel like youtube where not many ppl have acces at and there those girls tooke it(not hakering).there was a problem where evey single user on that portal had their private photos/videos/accounts avalible for everyone and thats way the videos have been stollen.
we have just some screenshots from the video with blanket.thats all.
and i'm glad that ppl that have the videos wount realise them.even if we want to.thats a good thing for the kids.
here are the screeshots:

You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login

[MJLover1990]

I know this is random to say but Blanket is such a cute little boy, he looks so much like his daddy! :mrgreen:

[the arabian nights]

strange wording why is it not "the legal guardians of [then the formal names] .. can minors have copyright? nope dont think so -

are we going to see a reversial now - less of the kids and less info - i think so

[Grazzia]

strange wording why is it not "the legal guardians of [then the formal names] .. can minors have copyright? nope dont think so -

are we going to see a reversial now - less of the kids and less info - i think so

do u mean that will be less pics with the kids?

not really...there are pics from Paris B-day

[MJLover1990]

strange wording why is it not "the legal guardians of [then the formal names] .. can minors have copyright? nope dont think so -

are we going to see a reversial now - less of the kids and less info - i think so

do u mean that will be less pics with the kids?

not really...there are pics from Paris B-day

Really?

[Grazzia]

strange wording why is it not "the legal guardians of [then the formal names] .. can minors have copyright? nope dont think so -

are we going to see a reversial now - less of the kids and less info - i think so

do u mean that will be less pics with the kids?

not really...there are pics from Paris B-day

Really?

yes,i'll make a topic on Family
go there

[evelin]

wow! that's impressive! and your video, too! but, where did you get it? I mean, they must remove it from where you took it, too!

[Heatherette]

strange wording why is it not "the legal guardians of [then the formal names] .. can minors have copyright? nope dont think so -

are we going to see a reversial now - less of the kids and less info - i think so

Yeah I was thinking the same thing...'Copyright claim by Michael Jackson's Kids', that don't even sound right. I think it's great that the children's privacy is being protected, but I think Youtube is bullcrappin. I think Youtube took the initiative, just my opinion. (I have a beef with Youtube for taking down certain MJ fan videos that haven't violated anything.)

& don't feel bad MJFAN7, you had the video for hoax purposes, we know that.  

[virgo75]

I don't think it was the kids personally as even if they have internet access, are they really going around yanking down videos and pictures of themselves?

I think the kids(as well as the rest of the Jacksons) have legal representatives that do these things for them.
Maybe for the kids they have a copywrited name as "Michael Jackson Kids."

[Grazzia]

strange wording why is it not "the legal guardians of [then the formal names] .. can minors have copyright? nope dont think so -

are we going to see a reversial now - less of the kids and less info - i think so

Yeah I was thinking the same thing...'Copyright claim by Michael Jackson's Kids', that don't even sound right. I think it's great that the children's privacy is being protected, but I think Youtube is bullcrappin. I think Youtube took the initiative, just my opinion. (I have a beef with Youtube for taking done certain MJ fan videos that haven't violated anything.)

& don't feel bad MJFAN7, you had the video for hoax purposes, we know that.  

or the family asked youtube to put that text just to make  ppl feel more giulty for not respecting kid's privacy...
it could be marketing

[MissingMichael56]

I don't think it's so much because of the hoax but because minor children are being paraded over YouTube in private family moments.  JMO