0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Hi, I just wonder why there's no DNA test of MJ after death? Why there is no confirmed or denied MJ's identity after death.? Even his father is not sure about MJ identity in TII. So what do you think?
Because they have a drivers license!Did Michael Jackson renew his driver's license?
If the autopsy report is legit, then they were simply satisfied with the driver's license, which is laughable. I remember I once told a doctor I didn't believe Michael had died and he told me that was very much impossible, because the coroner could never be fooled with a false corpse. I hope this doctor's seen the autopsy report. :lol: Incomplete dental records. No identification either!They could've even compared his fingerprints, couldn't they? His fingerprints should still be listed. They did nothing. "Okay, this guy looks like Michael Jackson. Fine."
Quote from: "Bee Bee"If the autopsy report is legit, then they were simply satisfied with the driver's license, which is laughable. I remember I once told a doctor I didn't believe Michael had died and he told me that was very much impossible, because the coroner could never be fooled with a false corpse. I hope this doctor's seen the autopsy report. :lol: Incomplete dental records. No identification either!They could've even compared his fingerprints, couldn't they? His fingerprints should still be listed. They did nothing. "Okay, this guy looks like Michael Jackson. Fine."Actually they did :? he was identified by family AND by fingerprints. This was the answer I got from LA Coroner, who I e-mailed, when the autopsy report got public.
Quote from: "Tina K."Quote from: "Bee Bee"If the autopsy report is legit, then they were simply satisfied with the driver's license, which is laughable. I remember I once told a doctor I didn't believe Michael had died and he told me that was very much impossible, because the coroner could never be fooled with a false corpse. I hope this doctor's seen the autopsy report. :lol: Incomplete dental records. No identification either!They could've even compared his fingerprints, couldn't they? His fingerprints should still be listed. They did nothing. "Okay, this guy looks like Michael Jackson. Fine."Actually they did :? he was identified by family AND by fingerprints. This was the answer I got from LA Coroner, who I e-mailed, when the autopsy report got public.LA Coroner could say anything, but it doesn't mean the truth.
However, I just noticed, under "Fingerprints", it says "Yes". I never thought much of it, it doesn't say they compared the fingerprints, just that there were fingerprints available. Or would it mean they compared them, too? Why not mention this under "identification", though? :roll:
Started by Miss.Peppers « 1 2 » Michael Jackson News