0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Re: Jackson Kids: No Supervision, Says Source
March 05, 2010, 02:53:16 PM
isnt it good cos katherine has to get the kids back with mike she has to let these lies come out or it wont work they are cool guys!! 8-)
Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest
friendly
0
funny
0
informative
0
agree
0
disagree
0
pwnt
0
like
0
dislike
0
late
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Re: Jackson Kids: No Supervision, Says Source
March 05, 2010, 05:48:18 PM
I bet these "sources" is grace. Randy even said that she wants to grant custody of the kids. She wants to make it look like Katherine isn't fit to take care of the kids.
Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest
friendly
0
funny
0
informative
0
agree
0
disagree
0
pwnt
0
like
0
dislike
0
late
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
[size=200]ii LOVE you Michael.!!! My life will nevaah be the same.! Cause boy you came and changed..the way I walk. The way ii talk<3[/color][/size]

yuu rockked maah world. yuu knoe yuu did. && everythin ii own I giive

I can\'t be still, yuu THRILL meeh. baybee be mine.!<3

Re: Jackson Kids: No Supervision, Says Source
March 06, 2010, 10:27:06 AM
WHERE THE HELL IS GRACE , WHEN SHE IS SUPPOSED TO TAKE CAKE OF CHILDREN... EACH DAY SOME WEIRD NEWS IS RELEASED.
Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest
friendly
0
funny
0
informative
0
agree
0
disagree
0
pwnt
0
like
0
dislike
0
late
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Re: Jackson Kids: No Supervision, Says Source
March 07, 2010, 03:01:07 PM
Geez that crap is signed Roger Friedman guys!!!!

The very same one who makes a living out of dissing MJ

Remember him during the trial??? He came up with BS every single day... he s worth nothing more than Diane Dimond and the other blonde witch (forgot her name)

Back then, roger friedman was king of "sources". He never gives a name to prove his facts. Looks like he didn't get better with the years
Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest
friendly
0
funny
0
informative
0
agree
0
disagree
0
pwnt
0
like
0
dislike
0
late
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Re: Jackson Kids: No Supervision, Says Source
March 07, 2010, 03:04:01 PM
Quote from: "imissMJ147"
I bet these "sources" is grace. Randy even said that she wants to grant custody of the kids. She wants to make it look like Katherine isn't fit to take care of the kids.

That makes no sense.  Grace would not have custody of the children...  she is not a relative or named in the will.
Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest
friendly
0
funny
0
informative
0
agree
0
disagree
0
pwnt
0
like
0
dislike
0
late
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Re: Jackson Kids: No Supervision, Says Source
March 07, 2010, 03:15:23 PM
Quote from: "DancingTheDream"
Quote from: "imissMJ147"
I bet these "sources" is grace. Randy even said that she wants to grant custody of the kids. She wants to make it look like Katherine isn't fit to take care of the kids.

That makes no sense.  Grace would not have custody of the children...  she is not a relative or named in the will.

The will is valid for custody as long as the current custodian still has rights or the current forfeits that rights voluntarily. Diana Ross will not raise these kids. IF DCFS gain legal guardianship of the children, will or not, they determine where the kids go. Not the family, not Grace and definitely not Michael.

Relative or not, the children could very well end up with Grace since she has a long standing relationship with them. If the family (any family member) is not found as suitable to care for the children, then they do seek a placement with people the children have an existing relationship. The children to some degree will have a say, but ultimately the decision rests with DCF.

I don't think they will take the kids away from Katherine. I don't think there is evidence enough that the kids are not being cared for.
Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest
friendly
0
funny
0
informative
0
agree
0
disagree
0
pwnt
0
like
0
dislike
0
late
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

 

Related Topics

  Subject / Started by Replies Last post
47 Replies
6492 Views
Last post December 23, 2009, 08:34:49 AM
by Emily Hutjes
25 Replies
3350 Views
Last post February 06, 2010, 07:55:24 PM
by hesouttamylife
50 Replies
3185 Views
Last post March 05, 2010, 03:28:26 PM
by SearchingForTruths
4 Replies
1312 Views
Last post April 24, 2010, 10:48:15 AM
by MJmakesmespeechless
8 Replies
1482 Views
Last post May 02, 2010, 09:30:48 AM
by MJsFan4Ever

SimplePortal 2.3.6 © 2008-2014, SimplePortal