Murray and Michael had an Argument on June 24th

  • 54 Replies
  • 3041 Views

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Lou

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 169

Re: Murray and Michael had an Argument on June 24th

  • on: March 04, 2010, 07:12:40 PM
This story makes no sense. They have an argument  and even so MJ asks the doctor to inject him with anesthetic? Hmm... :?
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

mykidsmum

  • *
  • Guest

Re: Murray and Michael had an Argument on June 24th

  • on: March 04, 2010, 08:39:51 PM
what if they had an argument but the argument was MJ saying he wasn't doing the tour and then Murray got his "orders" and did the deed?
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

word

  • *
  • Guest

Re: Murray and Michael had an Argument on June 24th

  • on: March 05, 2010, 10:08:29 PM
Although I doubt Michael would trust someone with his life that he just had an argument with,to give him a drug that could kill him,I do believe Murray murdered him.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline paula-c

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 7597
    • https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/378800000669499472/986af9e4566ce7ab11ef8703e3b19b04_normal.jpeg

Re: Murray and Michael had an Argument on June 24th

  • on: March 05, 2010, 10:18:57 PM
word, do not bother me. but if you think that Michael is dead, what are you doing here? :!:

mykidsmum

  • *
  • Guest

Re: Murray and Michael had an Argument on June 24th

  • on: March 05, 2010, 10:34:02 PM
Quote from: "paula-c"
word, do not bother me. but if you think that Michael is dead, what are you doing here? :!:
I believe he is too, I'm here because I want answers and as far as I know there is no murder forum.  I believe there is a possibility he could have hoaxed but these forums are the best for random info.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline tabloidburn

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 1621

Re: Murray and Michael had an Argument on June 24th

  • on: March 06, 2010, 03:58:11 PM
the argument could have been staged in front of 'witnesses' to support murrays guilt. let's see when that is gonna show up as 'evidence'... :mrgreen:
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
just because it\'s in print, doesn\'t mean it\'s the gospel - mj 2003

i have incredible disguises, i can fool my own mother - mj 1988

...details at eleven...

wear something green!

proud member of the army of l.o.v.e!

Offline mumof3

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 1973

Re: Murray and Michael had an Argument on June 24th

  • on: March 06, 2010, 06:22:28 PM
Quote from: "libra8"
FAKE.
I remember reading somewhere MJ & Dr Murray have never even met.

Fact, Dr Murray was at the house at the time of the 911 call, you can hear him in the background of the 911 call. And the 911 call Lat & Long on laptop screen place the call at the rear of MJs house on 6-25.

IMO MJ was long gone, left town, before the ambulance emergency stuff even happened, only decoys & illusion was used at the UCLA & durring ambulance stuff.

Supposidly Murray & MJ have known each other for 6 yrs??
I have searched & searched for a picture of them together, & have found NOTHING.
That is what i have been doing trying to find a picture of the muray and michael together and have not found one yet has anybody else found one.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

word

  • *
  • Guest

Re: Murray and Michael had an Argument on June 24th

  • on: March 07, 2010, 09:29:03 AM
Quote from: "paula-c"
word, do not bother me. but if you think that Michael is dead, what are you doing here? :!:
 I have a right to believe and feel what I want,and just because you think differently doesn't make your responce more true than mine,and if you keep reading you'll see that I'm not the only who feels this way.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

the arabian nights

  • *
  • Guest

Re: Murray and Michael had an Argument on June 24th

  • on: March 07, 2010, 09:30:24 AM
ithought cm was mikes personal doctor for the last 3 years
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline libra8

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 170

Re: Murray and Michael had an Argument on June 24th

  • on: March 07, 2010, 11:14:33 AM
Quote from: "the arabian nights"
ithought cm was mikes personal doctor for the last 3 years
3 yrs or 6 yrs, regardless the amount of time, MJ is/was a big picture taker, there are plenty of pictures of MJ & Dr Arnie Klein hanging out i.e. Christmas family time together.

But NOTHING, NA DA of MJ & CM, & I find that really strange.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

It\'s Black, It\'s White
It\'s Tough For You
To Get By

It\'s Black, It\'s White, Whoo

Offline paula-c

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 7597
    • https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/378800000669499472/986af9e4566ce7ab11ef8703e3b19b04_normal.jpeg

Re: Murray and Michael had an Argument on June 24th

  • on: March 07, 2010, 01:22:58 PM
word, I do not see why you bother, I'm just making a question, besides I never bothered with anyone on this forum for thinking differently to me .. and in no way have criticized his position.

Offline shakespere25

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 36

Re: Murray and Michael had an Argument on June 24th

  • on: March 07, 2010, 08:58:28 PM
Quote from: "Butterfly J"
Quote from: "DancingTheDream"
...Was Gonna Be Fired After The Shows (A Member Of Family Heard This) & Obviously ...

A member of family? We´ve been told that family was kept away from Mike, that even Joe wasn´t aloud to meet his son :?:
And why this "member of family" is been quiet for so long? Why do we hear about it just now?
 BS!


This is simple.  His family members would not want to spill the beans to protect the integrity of any informaion they may have.  I think it was his brother Randy who once brought a doctor to help Michael that he had never met when he had a sudden medical problem. This wouldn't be completely unheard of, or hard to believe. IMO... Not saying this is the case in this case..  I dunno...

At that time it was done to keep the tabloids at bay, and that makes sense in this situation with a big comeback in the works, and insurance companies being involved.  The difference between then and now would be... Who called the doc?   MJ's family stated that they couldn't get anywhere near him...
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

word

  • *
  • Guest

Re: Murray and Michael had an Argument on June 24th

  • on: March 08, 2010, 12:06:40 AM
Quote from: "paula-c"
word, I do not see why you bother, I'm just making a question, besides I never bothered with anyone on this forum for thinking differently to me .. and in no way have criticized his position.

Whateva,bother me when you start making sense,otherwise don't bother,peace
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline raphaelleanique

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 357

Re: Murray and Michael had an Argument on June 24th

  • on: March 08, 2010, 04:08:01 AM
Quote from: "Grace"
This is crap.
You don't kill the cow you are milking just to be famous of having killed it.
It was said that Doc Murray had not seen one buck of his paycheck yet.
Where is a motivation?

Just one more attention seeker.
I guess I will write an anonymous letter to GH about the lizard story in the bedroom and why Michael had a permanent blue toe and I bet it will be my 5 seconds of fame in the web.
Since even TMZ does not believe in a lizard in the bedroom and a permanent blue toe, I will have little chances however to make it to LA Times and guess I'd not better tweet about this.

;-)

Well said, this is BS. Googled Geraldine H.There is quite a lot about her; for example;

http://mjthekingofpop.wordpress.com/200 ... l-jackson/
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

the arabian nights

  • *
  • Guest

Re: Murray and Michael had an Argument on June 24th

  • on: March 08, 2010, 05:34:35 AM
why would mike wait until after the shows, the shows had a break over christmas as well and where to be global so why wait, there were other doctors
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline rayvyn

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 139

Re: Murray and Michael had an Argument on June 24th

  • on: March 09, 2010, 08:54:06 PM
Michael's life was riddled with lies, rumors, and innuendos. With so many knowing how this type of thing pained him, I'm amazed at how quickly some are willing to latch onto some unsubstantiated rumor. I say this with L.O.V.E.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline DancingTheDream

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 4923

Re: Murray and Michael had an Argument on June 24th

  • on: March 10, 2010, 03:33:48 PM
Just lately i have been thinking about what Murrays defence is going to be.

Someone on another thread has stated "self defence" is on the cards.

Think about it.  I mean, really think about that one....   and then think about the reason why this is being bandied about now...
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Aintnosunshine

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 481

Re: Murray and Michael had an Argument on June 24th

  • on: March 10, 2010, 04:45:32 PM
Although I am a lawyer i can`t see any "self defense" here.Can someone explain, please?
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
[size=150]L.O.V.E.  Aintnosunshine[/size]


Offline DancingTheDream

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 4923

Re: Murray and Michael had an Argument on June 24th

  • on: March 10, 2010, 04:49:32 PM
Quote from: "Aintnosunshine"
Although I am a lawyer i can`t see any "self defense" here.Can someone explain, please?

Well..   we dont know, do we?  We will have to wait to see what Murray comes up with in court.   He must think he has a defence, somehow.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Raven

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 709
    • http://www.myspace.com/ravenmyspace

Re: Murray and Michael had an Argument on June 24th

  • on: March 10, 2010, 04:50:09 PM
Quote from: "Aintnosunshine"
Although I am a lawyer i can`t see any "self defense" here.Can someone explain, please?
It's about peculiar codes for "probable crime" filled in at the searchwarrants:
viewtopic.php?f=96&t=6884
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline DancingTheDream

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 4923

Re: Murray and Michael had an Argument on June 24th

  • on: March 10, 2010, 04:55:21 PM
Quote from: "Raven"
Quote from: "Aintnosunshine"
Although I am a lawyer i can`t see any "self defense" here.Can someone explain, please?
It's about peculiar codes for "probable crime" filled in at the searchwarrants:
viewtopic.php?f=96&t=6884

Raven..  interesting that you brought this up on the other thread..  because i then immediately thought of this thread and how it ties in.

Hmm..  interesting to say the least.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Raven

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 709
    • http://www.myspace.com/ravenmyspace

Re: Murray and Michael had an Argument on June 24th

  • on: March 10, 2010, 04:59:22 PM
Quote from: "DancingTheDream"
Quote from: "Raven"
Quote from: "Aintnosunshine"
Although I am a lawyer i can`t see any "self defense" here.Can someone explain, please?
It's about peculiar codes for "probable crime" filled in at the searchwarrants:
viewtopic.php?f=96&t=6884

Raven..  interesting that you brought this up on the other thread..  because i then immediately thought of this thread and how it ties in.

Hmm..  interesting to say the least.
Yes...it does however support the murder/conspiracy theory which in turn leads up to the WPP theory.

Another thing, items found in Murray's car were :
-business card with the name of Brandon Phillips
-envelope with misc writing
-contract with the name of Conrad Murray

contract could have been an issue of arguement
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Game Player

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 386

Re: Murray and Michael had an Argument on June 24th

  • on: March 15, 2010, 06:55:19 AM
Quote from: "voiceforthesilent"
Quote from: "jill"
I'm lost, who is Geraldine Hughes?

right...who's Geraldine Hughes and why now? Sorry but I don't believe this. If Dr Murray wanted to become famous, killing Michael wasn't exactly going to make it any better.

Who would want to be the person who killed MJ? Your life would be misery. You would have to hide from people all the time. Never knowing if a fan had spotted you and wanted revenge.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
There\'s a man, who plays the game of life so well...

topsecretgirl

  • *
  • Guest

Re: Murray and Michael had an Argument on June 24th

  • on: March 16, 2010, 06:08:52 PM
I don't believe this story, it's GARBAGE again!
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

somekindofsign

  • *
  • Guest

Re: Murray and Michael had an Argument on June 24th

  • on: March 16, 2010, 07:01:22 PM
I don´t even belive they ever met if this is a hoax.

PS: We have to start saying ITIAH (if this is a hoax)
      Ah! HAITI backwards!!! I´m freaking out now :lol:
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

 

SimplePortal 2.3.6 © 2008-2014, SimplePortal