UCLA pic taken on 06/24/09!

  • 34 Replies
  • 3823 Views

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

somekindofsign

  • *
  • Guest
    • Show only replies by somekindofsign

Re: UCLA pic taken on 06/24/09!

  • on: March 16, 2010, 02:44:22 PM
Quote from: "Gina Jackson"
THIS IS IT - ALL FOR L.O.V.E. THE BEST IS YET TO COME - I BELIEVE!!!!
LOVE FOR ALL FRIENDS! We are totally UNITED, We are a FAMILY!!

Yeeah...
In may pains, in my sorrow,
IN THE PROMISSE OF ANOTHER TOMORROW!!!!
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Raven

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 709
    • Show only replies by Raven
    • http://www.myspace.com/ravenmyspace

Re: UCLA pic taken on 06/24/09!

  • on: March 16, 2010, 02:53:49 PM
Quote from: "somekindofsign"
Last days I´ve been working on the UCLA pics that I posted on the stretcher thread.
But now I have just realized one thing that have petrified me.

I can´t show it to you here, so to see what I found you have to do what follow:
Go to this pic and save it in your computer:



http://http://www.bittenandbound.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/ambulance-arrives-at-hospital-with-michael-jackson.jpg

Ok, then go to the windows explorer and open the folder.
Choose to see "Details" view mode.
Make shure that "Image taken date" (can´t see if this is so in English Windows) is displayed.
And tell me what date was it taken...

06/24/09 20:00

I just cannot understand this!!!

It happens the same wih this one:



http://http://www.bittenandbound.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/michael-jackson-arrives-via-ambulance-at-ucla-medical-center.jpg
8-) One that I saved in the past with exactly the same name, exact same picture has date "06/24/09 19:00"
Could be that the camera with which the picture was taken did not have the correct time set...I have that often too
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

somekindofsign

  • *
  • Guest
    • Show only replies by somekindofsign

Re: UCLA pic taken on 06/24/09!

  • on: March 16, 2010, 02:57:38 PM
Perfectly, although it´s strange in a camara from a professional...
Who knows!
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

somekindofsign

  • *
  • Guest
    • Show only replies by somekindofsign

Re: UCLA pic taken on 06/24/09!

  • on: April 22, 2010, 07:50:01 AM
I´ve changed my sistem to windows 7 and now I have realized that the creation date can simply be changed in properties with windows explorer... so I´ve come to the conclusion that:

IT IS POSSIBLE TO CHANGE THAT DATA.

Although I still can´t see the sense to do so.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline simplyme

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 649
    • Show only replies by simplyme

Re: UCLA pic taken on 06/24/09!

  • on: April 27, 2010, 12:48:29 AM
Quote from: "somekindofsign"
Last days I´ve been working on the UCLA pics that I posted on the stretcher thread.
But now I have just realized one thing that have petrified me.

I can´t show it to you here, so to see what I found you have to do what follow:
Go to this pic and save it in your computer:



http://http://www.bittenandbound.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/ambulance-arrives-at-hospital-with-michael-jackson.jpg

Ok, then go to the windows explorer and open the folder.
Choose to see "Details" view mode.
Make shure that "Image taken date" (can´t see if this is so in English Windows) is displayed.
And tell me what date was it taken...

06/24/09 20:00

I just cannot understand this!!!

It happens the same wih this one:



http://http://www.bittenandbound.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/michael-jackson-arrives-via-ambulance-at-ucla-medical-center.jpg

For the purpose of illustrating how easy it is to screw with people...........check the date on this.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

somekindofsign

  • *
  • Guest
    • Show only replies by somekindofsign

Re: UCLA pic taken on 06/24/09!

  • on: April 27, 2010, 05:46:10 AM
That´s what I have just stated.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline simplyme

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 649
    • Show only replies by simplyme

Re: UCLA pic taken on 06/24/09!

  • on: April 27, 2010, 10:22:31 AM
Quote from: "somekindofsign"
That´s what I have just stated.

I'm sorry, I didn't see your post.  The "sense" is everyone screws with the hoaxers.  They do it on purpose and keep you running in circles getting all lathered up about absolutely nothing.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

somekindofsign

  • *
  • Guest
    • Show only replies by somekindofsign

Re: UCLA pic taken on 06/24/09!

  • on: April 27, 2010, 10:25:27 AM
Yes, we don´t know... maybe someone messing around, or maybe true...
Thank you for the pic!
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline iamhere4mj

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 479
    • Show only replies by iamhere4mj

Re: UCLA pic taken on 06/24/09!

  • on: October 23, 2010, 07:28:13 PM
Since I am new here I am bouncing from place to place to see what has already been talked about and came upon one of my favorite subjects - the ambulance at UCLA!

Yep, the date stamp does say 06-24-2009 - when I first saw this a long time ago all I could think of was what Ben said, "that day and the other day".

Here are two pics where I have done some comparing on where things line up:

Pic 1:



Pic 2:



I labeled the tiles and you can see that things don't line up to each pic, and we have a gap between the ambulance and the door....now even taking into consideration different camera angles reflections shouldn't move from tile to tile. You can even see where the reflectors on the side of the ambulance don't even match up.


Original Pic 1:



Original Pic 2 (the one dated 06-24-09)



Here is what I have in the property section for the one dated June 24-09:

Title: michael jackson hospital arrival 250609

Description: Michael Jackson arriving by ambulance at the UCLA Medical Center, after suffering fatal heart attack at the age of 50. Los Angels, California - 25.06.09

***no TMZ, no Access Hollywood, no Extra, no Inside Edition, no Entertainment Tonight. Available for the rest of the world***

Credit: (Mandatory) WENN.com

Camera Model: nothing listed

Date Taken: 6/24/2009 8:00 PM (I have 2 other times of 6:00 PM and 7:00 PM - I think it refers to time zones)

Other captions on this picture:

michael-jackson-arrives-via-ambulance-at-ucla-medical-center
Type: JPEG Image
Date taken: 6/24/2009 7 PM
Rating: Unrated
Dimensions: 640x427
Size: 45.7 KB
Title: michael jackson hospital arrival 250609

Description

Title: michael jackson hospital arrival 250609

Origin:

Authors: HTA/ZOJ  ( am assuming these are the initials of the people involved)
Date Taken: 6/24/2009 6:00 PM
Copyright: WENN.com

I too see the different time stamps and am not sure what that means unless somehow time zones are figured in somehow.

From these two pics I think we have two different ambulances that were at UCLA. And also look that there are actually different people in the pics as well.

Love you Michael!
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline suspicious mind

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 5984
  • reading between the li_es
    • Show only replies by suspicious mind

Re: UCLA pic taken on 06/24/09!

  • on: October 23, 2010, 08:23:06 PM
Quote from: "somekindofsign"
Yes for shure, confusion.
Be a photographer is part of my work and don´t see the point on doing that.
I stock my almbums and work with metadata to sort etc.

The metadata was modified, but wasn´t the modifying date what was changed to be on 24,
it reflects that on 24 the metadata was changed... don´t know if I explain myself.

There are many ways to work, OK, and maybe I can´t see the reason to modify the modifying date.

Tell us Christiana, can you give us a reason to do that, just asking...

I just don´t know if the pics were taken on 24, and of course if it was so, on 25 they had to reproduce a little of the scene. But all this is strange.


i don't know if i am anywhere near close but are you saying this could have been taken any time prior to the 24th and that on the 24th the date was changed to the 25th? :?
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
"I am sending you out like sheep among wolves. Therefore be shrewd as serpents and as innocent as doves."  




Why not just tell people I'm an alien from Mars? Tell them I eat live chickens and do a voodoo dance at midnight. They'll believe anything you say, because you're a reporter. But if I, Michael Jackson, were to say, "I'm an alien from Mars and I eat live chickens and do a voodoo dance at midnight," people would say, "Oh, man, that Michael Jackson is nuts. He's cracked up. You can't believe a single word that comes out of his mouth."

 

Related Topics

  Subject / Started by Replies Last post
4 Replies
983 Views
Last post December 04, 2009, 07:53:44 PM
by Christiana
4 Replies
530 Views
Last post January 03, 2010, 06:55:16 PM
by Christiana
132 Replies
6809 Views
Last post May 01, 2010, 02:20:40 AM
by SiMTii
10 Replies
1158 Views
Last post January 22, 2010, 06:10:59 AM
by Tina K.
6 Replies
884 Views
Last post January 28, 2010, 12:50:07 PM
by KingMJ