Mj Drug Deposition in 2007..was a PRODUCTION made much LATER

  • 49 Replies
  • 1586 Views

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline voiceforthesilent

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 5485
Quote from: "Raven"
Quote from: "DancingTheDream"
Quote from: "Raven"
Quote from: "DancingTheDream"
Quote from: "Raven"
If it is an official deposition, there are files/records about it the lawyers can request for viewing if necessary for verification

F. Marc Schaffel Productions LLC has it copywrited!!!!
That probably does not matter, he just happened to film it.

 :roll:   He is the guy making the complaint, not the guy who filmed it!!

And yes, the blue background has always puzzled me...  in all the other depositions it has never been filmed like this...  and MJ looks the same in 2009...  the hair, the make up, the face...   it all adds up.

All oddness.
If he has copyright, he filmed it. Sounds plausible also as he was the one filing the complaint, that he wanted to document what was said literally.

Marc couldn't have filmed that without Michael's approval, right?
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
I'm proud to be a child of God and a member of MJ's Army of L.O.V.E.
 
"Press coverage of my life is like [watching] a fictitious movie...like watching science fiction. It's not true." ~Michael Jackson (2005)

"You should not believe everything you read. You are missing the most important revelations". Craig Harvey 3-15-2012

Offline mumof3

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 1973
You might be right it is waiting there to be used.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Hoaxornot

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 100
very interesting Video
think this is more recent then 2007...
I would say late 2008 to early 2009
His face was more caved in... just before he got some filler from Dr Klein
Blue background is strange..  It is not a blue screen (for special effects) since it is actually GREEN!!! go figure!
It seems to me that he is lying or not saying the whole truth
He knew he was filmed because he looked directly at the camera
Perfect hair, makeup and clothes like for a TV interview
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline PinkTopaz

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 1013
Quote from: "DancingTheDream"
http://michaelsguardian.blogspot.com/2010/02/drugs-story-february-11-2010.html

Ive found this interesting blog.

Makes some good representations that the 2007 "drug depositions" were not legal depositions but PRODUCTIONS...  and made much LATER than claimed.
Yes, yes, yes!! I feel cheated here because I discovered this back in October, I just wasn't a member of any hoax board yet- I knew I should have joined back then..! DancingtheDream, have you seen the one from ET that's supposed to be from 2005? It's really short, but it's filmed with like a weird home movie camera- That's the one I saw in Oct- and I thought the exact same thing as you!! I don't know if it's on YT, I don't think it it, but he's in his beloved red shirt in that one and it looks just like 2009! They don't show the lawyer's face, and they never even really say why they're filming this- the guy just asks Michael about that terrible spider bite, and Michael seems nervous and you can kinda tell he's acting. Does anyone else know which one I mean?
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

the arabian nights

  • *
  • Guest
mike i think from the vids i have seen in the past and presently seems to have been very alert thus not generally under the influence of drug/med drugs - not typical situation.

but one of the above vid's states that the milk has particularly a likeable drug as its puts you straight out and then you wake and go, no ill hazy after effects.

the thing is if due to other circumstances - you make up contemporareous evidence to get you out of the then present circumstances, that body of evidence will almost become factual and regarded as historical fact in the future.

so if in the past mike sent out information that he was addicted or his mind was affected by med drugs, even if the basis for the message is to get him out of a contract or because of the neg media about false molestation; pp will only see the message the admittance  and will not go behind the evidence that was put forward- especially later on.

if he was found to have lied than he would have a credibility issue in the future.

mike is not represented at CM's criminal trial so no one will go behind elizabeths version or mikes comments. the problem with doing this, it can backfire.
« Last Edit: February 13, 2010, 05:55:16 AM by the arabian nights »

Offline DooDoo

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 437
Wow, this is a great finding!!!! It all seems staged, it's true!!! I thought that too when I first watched the video. Even his reactions to the questions, if you compare this video with the other ones linked in this topic, seem staged.
YAY!!!! :D
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »


you are my life


speechless, that\'s how you make me feel

I want a hippopotamus for Christmas

the arabian nights

  • *
  • Guest
to me mike looks as if he is not saying the truth  or manipulating the truth in his responses, because he wanted to get out of the contract and not want the financial consequences of breaking that contract. that is an understandable human reaction. no one has every said mike was a little angel, he was a clever man. i dont mean that in a bad way.  we all make decision and then look to get out of it. he was complex and dimensional and had been in the business all his life he would have learnt like reading a book how to play the system.

generally the courts will believe what is presented to them, it is for the otherside to  tear it apart, that is way the better legal team the better the result because of loop holes, because technical points etc.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Raven

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 709
    • http://www.myspace.com/ravenmyspace
It may work both ways. It only shows he was -according to himself- at some point drugged in such a way that it impaired his consciousness to the point of not even remembering to have given a power of attorney to D. Wiesner.

It does not make clear WHO did the drugging. It may have been Michael himself, yes, but it may also have been people wanting to take control over him to gain access to his assets. Same scenario seems to have been repeating itself with Tohme Tohme, remember the phonecall Michael made to J. Gaitlin? SOMEHOW Tohme got into a position where he had gained total control over Michael's business. How to do it? Just slip a little pill in his drink, wait until he is sleepy/groggy, then keep him in that state with more sufficient medication, then have him sign a power of attorney or a checque, et voila. He mentioned several times that they were trying to poison him.

Arabian Nights, wouldn't it be interesting to post your link to the forensic pathologist Youtube video into the coroner's report thread?
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline mumof3

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 1973
Quote from: "Hoaxornot"
very interesting Video
think this is more recent then 2007...
I would say late 2008 to early 2009
His face was more caved in... just before he got some filler from Dr Klein
Blue background is strange..  It is not a blue screen (for special effects) since it is actually GREEN!!! go figure!
It seems to me that he is lying or not saying the whole truth
He knew he was filmed because he looked directly at the camera
Perfect hair, makeup and clothes like for a TV interview
I dont think  michaels face  caved in he is always handsome
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline ILuvUMoreMJ

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 570
It would be an interesting theory, and it does look strange with the blue screen, but to me he looks just how he looked when he went to Japan in 2007.  

Edit:  I found these articles dated in 2007 & 2008 speaking about this exact deposition, so it must have happened when it said it did... http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,304977,00.html and http://www.crazydepos.com/2008/04/michael-jackson.html
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
I will always love you Michael!

Offline DancingTheDream

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 4923
Quote from: "PinkTopaz"
Quote from: "DancingTheDream"
http://michaelsguardian.blogspot.com/2010/02/drugs-story-february-11-2010.html

Ive found this interesting blog.

Makes some good representations that the 2007 "drug depositions" were not legal depositions but PRODUCTIONS...  and made much LATER than claimed.
Yes, yes, yes!! I feel cheated here because I discovered this back in October, I just wasn't a member of any hoax board yet- I knew I should have joined back then..! DancingtheDream, have you seen the one from ET that's supposed to be from 2005? It's really short, but it's filmed with like a weird home movie camera- That's the one I saw in Oct- and I thought the exact same thing as you!! I don't know if it's on YT, I don't think it it, but he's in his beloved red shirt in that one and it looks just like 2009! They don't show the lawyer's face, and they never even really say why they're filming this- the guy just asks Michael about that terrible spider bite, and Michael seems nervous and you can kinda tell he's acting. Does anyone else know which one I mean?

No.. ive not seen that one, i dont think ive ever seen one where he wearing a red shirt.

If you ever find it please post it.  xx
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline DancingTheDream

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 4923
Quote from: "ILuvUMoreMJ"
It would be an interesting theory, and it does look strange with the blue screen, but to me he looks just how he looked when he went to Japan in 2007.  

Edit:  I found these articles dated in 2007 & 2008 speaking about this exact deposition, so it must have happened when it said it did... http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,304977,00.html and http://www.crazydepos.com/2008/04/michael-jackson.html

Thankyou.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

the arabian nights

  • *
  • Guest
[youtube:1dapmaqy]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xk-hb4Fwr94&feature=related[/youtube:1dapmaqy]
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline DancingTheDream

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 4923
@arabian nights..  very interesting video.   All hell is about to break loose because the lies are unravelling.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline alovesmichael

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 903
Quote from: "DancingTheDream"
@arabian nights..  very interesting video.   All hell is about to break loose because the lies are unravelling.

I sure hope they will because I want the whole truth! Everyonecontradicting themselves all the time is doing my head in... How many people are actually involved or are they just being fame-seeking retards that can't even convince a child with their lies?
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline kelly wright

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 219
didn't Michael say to LMP that he DID NOT WANT TO TURN OUT LIKE ELVIS ? why would he produce a video making himself look like a drug addict ? Someone else wants him to look like a drug addict ,is the way it would appear to me . Why become {intentionally } exactly what you do not want to become . It makes no sense . Could it be that someone was preparing a senario for the future murder of MJ in advance so when he wound up dead from drugs no one would be surprised ? Were they setting up a defense for a Dr to murder Mj this far in  advance ?1 st they try to make him look like a freak ,then a child molester ,and a homosexual {BTW are paedophiles usually sexually active with children ,women and men ?} and now they are trying to make him look like a hardcore drug addict .I read that the defense would be producing video that proves Mj had a bad drug problem .Will they use this video ? They better not ,it is tainted and should be inadmissable in court . I hate to be a Debbie Downer but I don't think it is possible that the DA office will properly represent Michael and his family .I think that a special prosicutor  should be called in .Due to the corruption going on .There is another on going case of corruption  going on  right now and it involves Tom Sneddon . See the William Wagner channel on u tube . He lives in CA and taped a lot of the trial and has interviews with T. Measereau and and Aphrodite Jones . It is a case involving a women named April .I would post it but I don't know how . But anyways you all  should check it out .
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Venus7

  • *
  • Guest
Mike wanted to get out from some contract, I think from some shows in Berlin, if I'm not wrong.
He looks to me like 2007-2008 Michael.
But talking about propofol, I would like to know where is Michael's ex-Doctor Anesthesiologist who was working for Mike on HIStory tour? He said that he was putting Michael down every night after the shows and bringing him back in the morning. Why is his x Dr. staying low key?
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

the arabian nights

  • *
  • Guest
Quote from: "Venus7"
Mike wanted to get out from some contract, I think from some shows in Berlin, if I'm not wrong.
He looks to me like 2007-2008 Michael.
But talking about propofol, I would like to know where is Michael's ex-Doctor Anesthesiologist who was working for Mike on HIStory tour? He said that he was putting Michael down every night after the shows and bringing him back in the morning. Why is his x Dr. staying low key?
it seems on must tours he had private doctors giving him stuff
this information may not have been put on his official medical records like the ones we have
the other doctors, the causation, link may be too great to attribute blame for his death. thus it would fall on the immediate care he received.

but as i said in another thread - consider the play/book the inspector calls, the players all contributed to the woman's death, and if this is a death or a hoax the players in mikes life all contributed to the present situation death or hoax.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Raven

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 709
    • http://www.myspace.com/ravenmyspace
Quote from: "Venus7"
But talking about propofol, I would like to know where is Michael's ex-Doctor Anesthesiologist who was working for Mike on HIStory tour? He said that he was putting Michael down every night after the shows and bringing him back in the morning. Why is his x Dr. staying low key?
There has been mentioning of that yes, but to my knowledge there was no mention of propofol specifically of having been used by those HIStory tour physician(s).
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline DancingTheDream

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 4923
@arabian nights...  now that IS interesting, what you have put above.

RANDY JACKSON....   :shock:   MICHAEL BLAMED RANDY!!!!    Yet Randy is the one now who is apart from the other brothers and doesnt agree with TII and their reality show.
Randy was the one who was always portrayed as being close to MJ at the end...  yet here we have MJ blaming Randy for trying to steal his fortune.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

the arabian nights

  • *
  • Guest
mike in november 2008 was too sick to come to the uk

so why in march was he fit enough to come for the 02 conference?

http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2008 ... ?site=news
Michael Jackson 'too sick' to go to court
By Europe correspondent Emma Alberici and wires

Posted Wed Nov 19, 2008 9:01am AEDT
Updated Wed Nov 19, 2008 1:17pm AEDT

 
Unfit for travel: 'King of Pop' Michael Jackson. (Reuters: Kiyoshi Ota, file photo)
A court in London has been told that pop star Michael Jackson is too sick to travel to London to take part in a court case initiated by Bahrain's royal family.

Jackson's lawyer presented London's High Court with a medical report on the entertainer's condition.

It said that on a best case prognosis it would be unwise for him to travel given his condition, which was not specified.

Sheikh Abdulla bin Hamad Al Khalifa, second son of the King of Bahrain, is suing his cash-strapped former friend Jackson for $US7 million ($10.9 million), demanding the repayment of several advances which the artist has argued were gifts.

According to the prince's lawyer Bankim Thanki, Jackson signed a contract to record albums, write an autobiography and stage shows, and that document noted that $US7 million would be deducted from the artist's royalties to pay for the expenses.

Jackson has asked to testify via video link from the United States.


'Personal betrayal'

Jackson visited Bahrain with his children and personal staff in the aftermath of his 2005 child molestation trial, and left in May 2006 to go to Europe and Japan.

A month later, he asked Sheikh Abdulla to sign a document releasing him from his obligations under the previous contract - a request the prince refused, Mr Thanki said.

"My client felt a strong sense of personal betrayal because this was someone he considered a close personal friend," he told the court.

"The work they had done together and the plans for the future all seemed to be totally frustrated."

Representing Jackson, Robert Englehart said: "There is no doubt that Sheikh Abdulla was very generous in his hospitality and general treatment of Michael Jackson."

"It will be my submission that this contract is clearly intended by both parties to be one of the contractual arrangements in a joint venture which never actually materialised," he added.

"This was one brick in a building which was never built."

Mr Thanki told the court on Monday that Jackson and the Sheikh have a "close personal relationship" and even collaborated on a musical project - Jackson recorded a song written by the prince which was planned as a charity single.

A recording of the song will be played in court during the trial.

The Sheikh's lawyer said he helped support Jackson financially after the 2005 trial, including a request for $US1 million in April 2005 and the $US2.2 million legal bill for the court case.

Jackson contests the claim, saying the Sheikh's case is based on "mistake, misrepresentation and undue influence."
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Raven

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 709
    • http://www.myspace.com/ravenmyspace
Quote from: "DancingTheDream"
@arabian nights...  now that IS interesting, what you have put above.

RANDY JACKSON....   :shock:   MICHAEL BLAMED RANDY!!!!    Yet Randy is the one now who is apart from the other brothers and doesnt agree with TII and their reality show.
Randy was the one who was always portrayed as being close to MJ at the end...  yet here we have MJ blaming Randy for trying to steal his fortune.
I agree, found it peculiar as well.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline DancingTheDream

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 4923
Quote from: "Raven"
Quote from: "DancingTheDream"
@arabian nights...  now that IS interesting, what you have put above.

RANDY JACKSON....   :shock:   MICHAEL BLAMED RANDY!!!!    Yet Randy is the one now who is apart from the other brothers and doesnt agree with TII and their reality show.
Randy was the one who was always portrayed as being close to MJ at the end...  yet here we have MJ blaming Randy for trying to steal his fortune.
I agree, found it peculiar as well.

And Michael is the one we should always listen to.  The truth resonates from MJ.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

the arabian nights

  • *
  • Guest
but you must agree that mike is able to bend the truth - otherwise no hoax
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

the arabian nights

  • *
  • Guest
so much smoke and mirrors
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

 

SimplePortal 2.3.6 © 2008-2014, SimplePortal