0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Re: This Is It Doubles????
February 12, 2010, 08:38:51 AM
Quote
OMG are joking? That's obviously a camera filming the pressconference from the back

Yes, in the image on the right, but not the left image, which is a person behind the curtain.
Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest
friendly
0
funny
0
informative
0
agree
0
disagree
0
pwnt
0
like
0
dislike
0
late
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Re: This Is It Doubles????
February 12, 2010, 09:06:56 AM
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login

This was just posted in another thread. Very enlightening.
Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest
friendly
0
funny
0
informative
0
agree
0
disagree
0
pwnt
0
like
0
dislike
0
late
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
I'm proud to be a child of God and a member of MJ's Army of L.O.V.E.
 
"Press coverage of my life is like [watching] a fictitious movie...like watching science fiction. It's not true." ~Michael Jackson (2005)

"You should not believe everything you read. You are missing the most important revelations". Craig Harvey 3-15-2012

*Mo*

  • Guest
Re: This Is It Doubles????
February 12, 2010, 09:38:13 AM
Quote from: "Venus7"
As I said before, there is NO DOUBLES in this movie.
Whoever thinks the opposite, buy Blu-Ray DVD and watch it on big screen HDTV at your house and you will see that there is no doubles.

I disagree, the blue ray shows the doubles even better.  

Has anyone ever wondered why there are two types of footage in This Is It?  There's the HD footage, full screen:


and then there's the smaller, low quality footage, which is not full screen:


These are screenshots from the blue ray, and you can clearly see the difference in quality.  I tend to believe that if Mike is indeed in This Is It, he's in low quality footage, and for some reason I think that footage was pre recorded.
Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest
friendly
0
funny
0
informative
0
agree
0
disagree
0
pwnt
0
like
0
dislike
0
late
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Re: This Is It Doubles????
February 12, 2010, 10:48:46 AM
Mo,

I said beofre I didnt think there were any doubles. Then I thought there were...I changed my mind on this daily. Then I remembered someone saying on the old mjkit that the orange pants dude is actually one of MJ's dancers. When he is dancing, its not like MJ at all. And he looks different. younger...so now I change my mind to, YES, there is at least one double in the movie!! LOL
Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest
friendly
0
funny
0
informative
0
agree
0
disagree
0
pwnt
0
like
0
dislike
0
late
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

*

Eva R

Re: This Is It Doubles????
February 12, 2010, 11:05:27 AM
Quote from: "THE JACKSONOLOGIST"
Mo,

I said beofre I didnt think there were any doubles. Then I thought there were...I changed my mind on this daily. Then I remembered someone saying on the old mjkit that the orange pants dude is actually one of MJ's dancers. When he is dancing, its not like MJ at all. And he looks different. younger...so now I change my mind to, YES, there is at least one double in the movie!! LOL
But how could he change his voice JUST like Michael's voice? :S
Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest
friendly
0
funny
0
informative
0
agree
0
disagree
0
pwnt
0
like
0
dislike
0
late
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions


Love is animals
Love is the answer
Love is respect
Love is Michael
Love is my message!!

*Mo*

  • Guest
Re: This Is It Doubles????
February 12, 2010, 11:06:26 AM
Quote from: "Eva R"
Quote from: "THE JACKSONOLOGIST"
Mo,

I said beofre I didnt think there were any doubles. Then I thought there were...I changed my mind on this daily. Then I remembered someone saying on the old mjkit that the orange pants dude is actually one of MJ's dancers. When he is dancing, its not like MJ at all. And he looks different. younger...so now I change my mind to, YES, there is at least one double in the movie!! LOL
But how could he change his voice JUST like Michael's voice? :S

Lip-syncing
Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest
friendly
0
funny
0
informative
0
agree
0
disagree
0
pwnt
0
like
0
dislike
0
late
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Re: This Is It Doubles????
February 12, 2010, 12:56:57 PM
Of course they use one track when they do a split screen
you see orange pant Michael and other Michael on 1 screen but they choose the sound recording they want
edit and put it in synch
The sound is always remixed and re recorder to be good enough for theatres

I really do not know about doubles.. I am sure when the dancers were rehearsing there would be a double but they chose not to show that part in the movie

Orange pant Michael does not move like Michael but again maybe he does look like like him

When i saw it in theatre i was 100% sure it was not Michael
Now I have it on Blue ray and not so sure

just his moves are strange... but why put a double for just a few shots?
Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest
friendly
0
funny
0
informative
0
agree
0
disagree
0
pwnt
0
like
0
dislike
0
late
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

*

Datroot

Re: This Is It Doubles????
February 12, 2010, 12:59:00 PM
I didn't even think organge pants looked like Michael.
Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest
friendly
0
funny
0
informative
0
agree
0
disagree
0
pwnt
0
like
0
dislike
0
late
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions


I'M A LOVER, NOT A FIGHTER

Re: This Is It Doubles????
February 12, 2010, 01:00:46 PM
Let's remember also that Michael Was visiting Dr Klein during those months to reconstruct his face ... and he did look good at the end
Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest
friendly
0
funny
0
informative
0
agree
0
disagree
0
pwnt
0
like
0
dislike
0
late
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

*

Datroot

Re: This Is It Doubles????
February 12, 2010, 01:02:02 PM
Quote from: "Hoaxornot"
Let's remember also that Michael Was visiting Dr Klein during those months to reconstruct his face ... and he did look good at the end

Its been mentioned before, Klein is a dermatologist and would not construct his face - he's not a plastic surgeon.
Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest
friendly
0
funny
0
informative
0
agree
0
disagree
0
pwnt
0
like
0
dislike
0
late
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions


I'M A LOVER, NOT A FIGHTER

*Mo*

  • Guest
Re: This Is It Doubles????
February 12, 2010, 01:14:55 PM
Quote from: "Hoaxornot"
Let's remember also that Michael Was visiting Dr Klein during those months to reconstruct his face ... and he did look good at the end

Can you say with certainty that that was Mike himself visiting doctors?  Because I have serious doubts about that...
Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest
friendly
0
funny
0
informative
0
agree
0
disagree
0
pwnt
0
like
0
dislike
0
late
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Re: This Is It Doubles????
February 12, 2010, 01:35:41 PM
Quote from: "*Mo*"
Quote from: "Venus7"
As I said before, there is NO DOUBLES in this movie.
Whoever thinks the opposite, buy Blu-Ray DVD and watch it on big screen HDTV at your house and you will see that there is no doubles.

I disagree, the blue ray shows the doubles even better.  

Has anyone ever wondered why there are two types of footage in This Is It?  There's the HD footage, full screen:


and then there's the smaller, low quality footage, which is not full screen:


These are screenshots from the blue ray, and you can clearly see the difference in quality.  I tend to believe that if Mike is indeed in This Is It, he's in low quality footage, and for some reason I think that footage was pre recorded.

so the one's in the HD footage are the doubles and the one in low quality is Michael?
Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest
friendly
0
funny
0
informative
0
agree
0
disagree
0
pwnt
0
like
0
dislike
0
late
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Venus7

  • Guest
Re: This Is It Doubles????
February 12, 2010, 01:52:16 PM
ALL IS MICHAEL IN TII, NO DOUBLES
Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest
friendly
0
funny
0
informative
0
agree
0
disagree
0
pwnt
0
like
0
dislike
0
late
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

*Mo*

  • Guest
Re: This Is It Doubles????
February 12, 2010, 02:03:40 PM
Quote from: "Jacksonology"
so the one's in the HD footage are the doubles and the one in low quality is Michael?

I didn't say that, I said: I tend to believe...

I however am also interested in getting to know why there are two types of footage in This Is It.  Thoughts, anyone?
Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest
friendly
0
funny
0
informative
0
agree
0
disagree
0
pwnt
0
like
0
dislike
0
late
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

*Mo*

  • Guest
Re: This Is It Doubles????
February 12, 2010, 02:11:15 PM
Quote from: "Venus7"
ALL IS MICHAEL IN TII, NO DOUBLES

I hear you Venus, loud and clear, but there is absolutely NO WAY you can convince me that it's all Mike in This Is It, no matter how many times you post the same reply.
Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest
friendly
0
funny
0
informative
0
agree
0
disagree
0
pwnt
0
like
0
dislike
0
late
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

 

Related Topics

  Subject / Started by Replies Last post
26 Replies
5386 Views
Last post January 01, 2010, 11:45:11 AM
by mykidsmum
6 Replies
1990 Views
Last post February 07, 2010, 04:23:07 PM
by Jacksonology100
8 Replies
1806 Views
Last post December 22, 2009, 01:18:42 PM
by EternalBliss
35 Replies
3684 Views
Last post March 15, 2010, 04:16:36 AM
by tiida11
140 Replies
11207 Views
Last post April 13, 2010, 11:05:47 PM
by Jacksonology

SimplePortal 2.3.6 © 2008-2014, SimplePortal