You are not allowed to view links.
Register or
LoginIt's only just beginning.
Georgia Senate opposes forcing microchips into people
ShareThis PrintE-mail
By Ty Tagami
The Atlanta Journal-Constitution
Georgians worried about having miniature computer circuits inserted into their bodies without their consent can rest a little easier now that their state lawmakers have taken action.
More Georgia politics stories »
Senators slam DOT board, DOT rethinks accounting move
School board reform alive
Senate: No microchip implants
Who's Who at the Capitol
More Ga. Politics news, helpful links
Political Insider / Jim Galloway »
Anti-abortion group targets black women with billboards
Blog: Gold Dome Live »
Senators meet on DOT accounting, DOT board may re-think
The state Senate voted overwhelmingly Thursday for legislation that would prohibit involuntary implantation of microchips in any body part.
“By passing this bill, we are sending the message that Georgia is committed to upholding its citizens’ constitutional rights and protection of their person,” the bill's author, Sen. Chip Pearson (R-Dawsonville), said in a written statement. He said technology is moving fast and “we must be careful that it doesn’t come at the harm of citizens. The benefits of a microchip that can be internally implanted are also available in many external forms.”
The Senate voted 47-2 in favor of the bill.
The Internet is awash with rumors about the government inserting microchips into people's heads without their consent or knowledge. This bill would prohibit that.
If Senate Bill 235 becomes law, it would ban microchip implantation against a person's will regardless of that person's age.
The Microchip Consent Act of 2010 defines a "microchip" as "any microdevice, sensor, transmitter, mechanism, electronically readable marking, or nanotechnology that is passively or actively capable of transmitting or receiving information."
The legislation exempts pacemakers from its prohibition.
The act would amend the assault and battery portion of the Georgia code to make it illegal to require insertion in exchange for any benefit, including employment, promotion or "any means that causes a person to acquiesce."
The bill would make involuntary installations a misdemeanor, and it would establish penalties for unwanted insertions. It also would create guidelines for voluntary implantation and require that only physicians put microchips into people.
The following is taken from Illuminati News 2012 - a dismantling of codes* The term "New World Order", just like the term "Illuminati", has been used by at least two different groups, meaning basically two different things:
1) A goal to change the current Order ("The Old World Order"), which is considered evil and anti-survival, and therefore the current power elite I call the Illuminati (see definition above) needs to be overthrown and their Old World Order to be destroyed and replaced by a benevolent "New World Order". The goal is a humanity-friendly One World Government. The means to overthrow the current Old World Order is by violence, if necessary. The reason I don't support this group is that I don't believe in their tactics. I believe in this.
2) A goal to reduce the world population to 500 million people in order to create a micro-chipped total enslaved society and a One World Government, run like a world dictatorship. This is the New World Order the Bush's, the Rockefellers, the Rothschilds, Gordon Brown, Henry Kissinger, Zbigniew Brzezinski and others are ringing in and have almost accomplished.