Murray child support case -- is there a case number?

  • 22 Replies
  • 1472 Views

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline YourLoveIsMagical

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 75
    • Show only replies by YourLoveIsMagical

Murray child support case -- is there a case number?

  • on: January 05, 2010, 07:33:20 PM
Question for the group-- does anyone know if there is a case number or online record of Murray's child support case that TMZ reported on yesterday?  Trying to determine if it is real or staged... thanks for your help!
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Iused2dream

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 300
    • Show only replies by Iused2dream
I asked that yesterday in this thread but no one knew.  I searched for hours Clark County courts, etc but found NO cases.  IMO, I think this is from Nov 16th fake court hearing & maybe TMZ just tweaked the color of his tie and removed the other guy who was sitting next to him....ok maybe I'm taking this too far and sound crazy.  If you find anything, let me know or PM me & we can discuss together.  http://http://michaeljacksonhoaxforum.com/phpbb2/viewtopic.php?f=28&t=248
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline YourLoveIsMagical

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 75
    • Show only replies by YourLoveIsMagical
Thanks for the response and I apologize for not seeing your post from yesterday.  Thanks!
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline DancingTheDream

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 4923
    • Show only replies by DancingTheDream
I have to say, it does look like a staged photograph to me....

Im in the UK so i think the rules are different here.. in the UK no photographers are allowed in Courts of Law.  Any photographic or recording equipment is banned.  When any high profile court case is on the news they always show "artist impressions" of the case... basically artists go in and draw the scene.

It looks to me as if the photographer is in front of the bench where Murray is sitting.

Would that be allowed in the USA????
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Mariso83

  • *
  • Guest
    • Show only replies by Mariso83
It's the same thing in Canada...

I don't understand why TMZ is allowed in court... I'm sure it's fake...
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline wishinghard

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 41
    • Show only replies by wishinghard
Quote from: "DancingTheDream"
I have to say, it does look like a staged photograph to me....

Im in the UK so i think the rules are different here.. in the UK no photographers are allowed in Courts of Law.  Any photographic or recording equipment is banned.  When any high profile court case is on the news they always show "artist impressions" of the case... basically artists go in and draw the scene.

It looks to me as if the photographer is in front of the bench where Murray is sitting.

Would that be allowed in the USA????
 

to be honest i think it is that the same here in the US because on the news they always have sketches of the court room scene...i aslo jus asked my step dad and he confirmed that since i am young and wanted 2 make sure that what i am posting is legit...so therfore this photo can probably be debunked because that is WAY illegal....i mean what would u need the camera for anyway, its like hey murry smile for the camera while ur pleding your case...CHEEESSEE!! lols :D  :lol:
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
L.O.V.E. can never be acomplished if you never beLIEve in your flaws and greatnesses.....when you realize your beauty only then will you be L.O.V.E.D as though you are beautiful-----the one and only...LIAH!!

Offline YourLoveIsMagical

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 75
    • Show only replies by YourLoveIsMagical
I found this TIME magazine article about cameras in courtrooms -- sometimes they are allowed, but not often.

A quote:
Most states that now let cameras into the courtroom require the permission of the prosecutor, the defendant and often the witnesses.

http://http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,947079-2,00.html
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline DancingTheDream

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 4923
    • Show only replies by DancingTheDream
Quote from: "YourLoveIsMagical"
I found this TIME magazine article about cameras in courtrooms -- sometimes they are allowed, but not often.

A quote:
Most states that now let cameras into the courtroom require the permission of the prosecutor, the defendant and often the witnesses.

http://http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,947079-2,00.html


OOOH.. NOW WHY WOULD DR MURRAY GIVE PERMISSION FOR PHOTOGRAPHS????   :shock:
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline wishinghard

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 41
    • Show only replies by wishinghard
Quote from: "DancingTheDream"
Quote from: "YourLoveIsMagical"
I found this TIME magazine article about cameras in courtrooms -- sometimes they are allowed, but not often.

A quote:
Most states that now let cameras into the courtroom require the permission of the prosecutor, the defendant and often the witnesses.

http://http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,947079-2,00.html


OOOH.. NOW WHY WOULD DR MURRAY GIVE PERMISSION FOR PHOTOGRAPHS????   :shock:


OMG i never heard of that before!! yea y would he want the cameras in there any way....2 say look im real i was present in court...also dat troot will soon be prevailed lols!!! :lol:
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
L.O.V.E. can never be acomplished if you never beLIEve in your flaws and greatnesses.....when you realize your beauty only then will you be L.O.V.E.D as though you are beautiful-----the one and only...LIAH!!

Offline DancingTheDream

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 4923
    • Show only replies by DancingTheDream
Debbie Rowe just been on live feed on TMZ in court.. so must be allowed???
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline angelshadow

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 8257
    • Show only replies by angelshadow
But I do not know why these things are transmitted on TV? That's nonsense
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline DancingTheDream

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 4923
    • Show only replies by DancingTheDream
Quote from: "angelshadow"
But I do not know why these things are transmitted on TV? That's nonsense

Only by TMZ.   :?
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline angelshadow

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 8257
    • Show only replies by angelshadow
TMZ...... :? Always TMZ
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline katy (MJFAN7)

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 3063
    • Show only replies by katy (MJFAN7)
I doubt there's a case number. If you saw that picture zoomed in on the "money"

it had Rita Hayworth on it from Gilda.

Number 1, that of course is obviously fake money
Number 2, she was in This is It during smooth criminal
Number 3, in that scene Michael played Ballin, the guy who fakes his death.

It all connects.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »


أملي هو فيكم.

Offline YourLoveIsMagical

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 75
    • Show only replies by YourLoveIsMagical
MJ4everLOVE posted this in response to my query on MJHD:

Case No. D-07-384990-F
Register of ActionsCase No. D-07-384990-FJulie A Brown, Plaintiff. vs. Conrad R Murray, Defendant. §
§
§
§
§
§
Case Type: Registration of Foreign Judgment
Date Filed: 12/03/2007
Location: Department P
Conversion Case Number: D384990


Party Information Lead Attorneys
Defendant Murray, Conrad R


Plaintiff Brown, Julie A
Pro Se

Retained
Events & Orders of the Court OTHER EVENTS AND HEARINGS
12/03/2007 Application of Foreign Judgment - NRS 17
02/07/2008 Affidavit of Service
12/05/2008 Affidavit of Service
12/05/2008 Notice
Of Filing Application Of Foreign Judgment And Affidavit Of Judgment Creditor
12/06/2008 Administrative Reassignment
Reassigned from Department E to Department P
Financial Information

Plaintiff Brown, Julie A
Total Financial Assessment 186.00
Total Payments and Credits 334.00
Balance Due as of 01/06/2010 (148.00)

12/03/2007 Transaction Assessment 148.00
12/03/2007 Payment (Window) Receipt # 2007-032301-FAM Brown & Associates (296.00)
05/30/2008 Transaction Assessment 5.00
05/30/2008 Payment (Window) Receipt # 2008-019605-FAM NA (5.00)
12/05/2008 Transaction Assessment 3.00
12/05/2008 Payment (Window) Receipt # 2008-43269-FAM N/A (3.00)
12/04/2009 Transaction Assessment 30.00
12/04/2009 Payment (Window) Receipt # 2009-73410-FAM Santoro Driggs Walch Kearney Holley & Thompson, LTD (30.00)
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline DancingTheDream

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 4923
    • Show only replies by DancingTheDream
I dont understand any of this.   :shock:
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Hoaxornot

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 100
    • Show only replies by Hoaxornot
I just checked Clark County public records. Yes there are 24 cases for Conrad Murray... Of course the court video is real...
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline DancingTheDream

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 4923
    • Show only replies by DancingTheDream
Quote from: "Hoaxornot"
I just checked Clark County public records. Yes there are 24 cases for Conrad Murray... Of course the court video is real...

Is it allowed for photogaphers and videos in court?
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Hoaxornot

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 100
    • Show only replies by Hoaxornot
I know the courtroom has video cameras
I do not remember them checking for cameras or phones
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Hoaxornot

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 100
    • Show only replies by Hoaxornot
I am from Vegas and yes now I remember seeing on the news , shots from different cases.. so I guess the tv crew is allowed to film
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline mdc

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 343
    • Show only replies by mdc
In an article, I read that Murray's baby mama's name is Nenita Malibiran, and that her lawyers name is Julie Brown. If this is true then I wonder why the lawyer is the plaintiff in the above case?
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Kirsche

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 2082
    • Show only replies by Kirsche
    • http://www.myspace.com/chrischl
There can't be a case number because there's no case.... Just knew as I found out ( and a few other persons) that the judge was already retired in 2008.....and then the money thing? Isn't it unsual that they're paying the money right there and to present on the table there in front of the lawyer? hmm

This whole money-thing is strange....Somebody zoomed in the money and it looks like it was Gildas Face ( Smooth Criminal Shortfilm in TII) was on it...


This whole thing was a fake to me
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
[
OKAY, EVERBODY! THAT\'S A WRAP!

Offline Hoaxornot

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 100
    • Show only replies by Hoaxornot
Unfortunately not fake
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

 

Related Topics

  Subject / Started by Replies Last post
0 Replies
314 Views
Last post January 09, 2010, 03:09:08 PM
by ladylee1979
5 Replies
566 Views
Last post January 24, 2010, 05:49:50 PM
by steffmaster1
0 Replies
350 Views
Last post February 10, 2010, 12:25:31 AM
by reading_on
24 Replies
1700 Views
Last post July 11, 2010, 01:17:54 AM
by happythoughts
10 Replies
794 Views
Last post February 16, 2010, 08:46:50 AM
by newoldfan