0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Quote from: "reading_on"Quote from: "2good2btrue"Hey guys. I've saved the picture and zoomed in on everything, and it's fake. She could have placed the ONLY tribute of MJ there herself, and notice how it's right at the front. LOOK CLOSELY AT THE PICTURES PLACED ON THE GROUND NEAR THE TOMB. TWO OF THE PICTURES ARE OF AN OLDER MAN, AND ONLY ONE RESEMBLES AN AFRICAN YOUNG BOY at the back. ALL THE FLOWERS HAVE A WHITE CARD, WITH NOTHING WRITTEN ON THEM. LOOKS LIKE THEY HAVE BEEN TURNED AROUND TO THE BLANK SIDE ON PURPOSE. ALSO, WHAT I FIND EVEN MORE BIZZARE, IS THE MOULD ON THE RIGHT TOMBSTONE. IT IS OF A MAN WITH BREASTS, AND A YOUNG CHILD VERY CLOSE TO HIS OR HER PRIVATE PARTS. THIS ABSOLUTELY WOULD NOT BE WHAT THE FAMILY WOULD HAVE CHOSEN, CONSIDERING WHAT MJ WENT THROUGH WITH THE TRIAL AND ALL. WHY NOT PICK AN ENBLEM OF A MAN SURROUNDED WITH MANY CHILDREN, LIKE PETER PAN. THIS IS A BIT FREAKY AND DISTASTEFUL. THERE'S A PICTURE OF AN OLD MAN AT THE BACK (COULD BE HIS DAD'S PHOTO) BUT THINK ABOUT IT. WHY THE HELL WOULD THEY PUT A PHOTO OF JOE JACKSON WITH MJ???No way. This cries out so fake. Whoever took the photo was obviously at another grave site of another family, and have just placed the MJ wreath with some sort of stuffed toy in a box,to fool us........I don't see the picture of the "old man". I see pictures of MJ, some drawn, some not. I see words on cards, so I am not seeing the blank one. The picture on the tomb looks like an MJ in armor like he was many times, holding the hand of a younger self.On old mjkit, there was a thread about the pictures Karen Faye posted before. And there were pics found, taken in the 60s I guess, from exactly that tomb.You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login (Scroll down here and you´ll see them).The pictures on the tomb were the same back then; they have nothing to do with MJ.
Quote from: "2good2btrue"Hey guys. I've saved the picture and zoomed in on everything, and it's fake. She could have placed the ONLY tribute of MJ there herself, and notice how it's right at the front. LOOK CLOSELY AT THE PICTURES PLACED ON THE GROUND NEAR THE TOMB. TWO OF THE PICTURES ARE OF AN OLDER MAN, AND ONLY ONE RESEMBLES AN AFRICAN YOUNG BOY at the back. ALL THE FLOWERS HAVE A WHITE CARD, WITH NOTHING WRITTEN ON THEM. LOOKS LIKE THEY HAVE BEEN TURNED AROUND TO THE BLANK SIDE ON PURPOSE. ALSO, WHAT I FIND EVEN MORE BIZZARE, IS THE MOULD ON THE RIGHT TOMBSTONE. IT IS OF A MAN WITH BREASTS, AND A YOUNG CHILD VERY CLOSE TO HIS OR HER PRIVATE PARTS. THIS ABSOLUTELY WOULD NOT BE WHAT THE FAMILY WOULD HAVE CHOSEN, CONSIDERING WHAT MJ WENT THROUGH WITH THE TRIAL AND ALL. WHY NOT PICK AN ENBLEM OF A MAN SURROUNDED WITH MANY CHILDREN, LIKE PETER PAN. THIS IS A BIT FREAKY AND DISTASTEFUL. THERE'S A PICTURE OF AN OLD MAN AT THE BACK (COULD BE HIS DAD'S PHOTO) BUT THINK ABOUT IT. WHY THE HELL WOULD THEY PUT A PHOTO OF JOE JACKSON WITH MJ???No way. This cries out so fake. Whoever took the photo was obviously at another grave site of another family, and have just placed the MJ wreath with some sort of stuffed toy in a box,to fool us........I don't see the picture of the "old man". I see pictures of MJ, some drawn, some not. I see words on cards, so I am not seeing the blank one. The picture on the tomb looks like an MJ in armor like he was many times, holding the hand of a younger self.
Hey guys. I've saved the picture and zoomed in on everything, and it's fake. She could have placed the ONLY tribute of MJ there herself, and notice how it's right at the front. LOOK CLOSELY AT THE PICTURES PLACED ON THE GROUND NEAR THE TOMB. TWO OF THE PICTURES ARE OF AN OLDER MAN, AND ONLY ONE RESEMBLES AN AFRICAN YOUNG BOY at the back. ALL THE FLOWERS HAVE A WHITE CARD, WITH NOTHING WRITTEN ON THEM. LOOKS LIKE THEY HAVE BEEN TURNED AROUND TO THE BLANK SIDE ON PURPOSE. ALSO, WHAT I FIND EVEN MORE BIZZARE, IS THE MOULD ON THE RIGHT TOMBSTONE. IT IS OF A MAN WITH BREASTS, AND A YOUNG CHILD VERY CLOSE TO HIS OR HER PRIVATE PARTS. THIS ABSOLUTELY WOULD NOT BE WHAT THE FAMILY WOULD HAVE CHOSEN, CONSIDERING WHAT MJ WENT THROUGH WITH THE TRIAL AND ALL. WHY NOT PICK AN ENBLEM OF A MAN SURROUNDED WITH MANY CHILDREN, LIKE PETER PAN. THIS IS A BIT FREAKY AND DISTASTEFUL. THERE'S A PICTURE OF AN OLD MAN AT THE BACK (COULD BE HIS DAD'S PHOTO) BUT THINK ABOUT IT. WHY THE HELL WOULD THEY PUT A PHOTO OF JOE JACKSON WITH MJ???No way. This cries out so fake. Whoever took the photo was obviously at another grave site of another family, and have just placed the MJ wreath with some sort of stuffed toy in a box,to fool us........
Michael Jackson's tomb my ass :roll: :roll:
I will never be convinced if his name is not on the tomb!! That is just NOT possible!!! If Michael would lay there, there would be def his name on the tomb but now i dont see any name or am i blind??
Quote from: "2good2btrue"Hey guys. I've saved the picture and zoomed in on everything, and it's fake. She could have placed the ONLY tribute of MJ there herself, and notice how it's right at the front. LOOK CLOSELY AT THE PICTURES PLACED ON THE GROUND NEAR THE TOMB. TWO OF THE PICTURES ARE OF AN OLDER MAN, AND ONLY ONE RESEMBLES AN AFRICAN YOUNG BOY at the back. ALL THE FLOWERS HAVE A WHITE CARD, WITH NOTHING WRITTEN ON THEM. LOOKS LIKE THEY HAVE BEEN TURNED AROUND TO THE BLANK SIDE ON PURPOSE. ALSO, WHAT I FIND EVEN MORE BIZZARE, IS THE MOULD ON THE RIGHT TOMBSTONE. IT IS OF A MAN WITH BREASTS, AND A YOUNG CHILD VERY CLOSE TO HIS OR HER PRIVATE PARTS. THIS ABSOLUTELY WOULD NOT BE WHAT THE FAMILY WOULD HAVE CHOSEN, CONSIDERING WHAT MJ WENT THROUGH WITH THE TRIAL AND ALL. WHY NOT PICK AN ENBLEM OF A MAN SURROUNDED WITH MANY CHILDREN, LIKE PETER PAN. THIS IS A BIT FREAKY AND DISTASTEFUL. THERE'S A PICTURE OF AN OLD MAN AT THE BACK (COULD BE HIS DAD'S PHOTO) BUT THINK ABOUT IT. WHY THE HELL WOULD THEY PUT A PHOTO OF JOE JACKSON WITH MJ???No way. This cries out so fake. Whoever took the photo was obviously at another grave site of another family, and have just placed the MJ wreath with some sort of stuffed toy in a box,to fool us........That's, what I first saw, too... See how "bad" our minds work!Looking very close, it looks to me like an Angel with folded wings, holding a child's hand. And the "breasts" could be part of an armour.But all those blurry images drive me mad!If this is his grave, it's so weird not to engrave his name! Here's another shoot of the tomb , where both reliefs are visible.
Even though I had contacted FL before about her taking pictures they still let her in? They know she will take pictures :
Quote from: "Eva R"I will never be convinced if his name is not on the tomb!! That is just NOT possible!!! If Michael would lay there, there would be def his name on the tomb but now i dont see any name or am i blind??Hi Eva, There's a plaque on the floor in front of the tomb. His name is probably on that.
Started by QuirkyDiana This Is It
Started by Miss.Peppers « 1 2 » Karen Faye
Started by MJROCKSMYSOCKSOFF « 1 2 » Other Odd Things
Started by DancingTheDream « 1 2 3 » Karen Faye
Started by Prozzy Hoax Videos