Child support hearing - fake?

  • 40 Replies
  • 3804 Views

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline angelshadow

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 8257

Re: Child support hearing - fake?

  • on: November 28, 2009, 01:23:27 PM
[quote = "francisca81"] [quote = "MJJ1982"] Child Support Anhörung war gefälscht, deshalb zeigten sie den Abfalleimer. Es ist Müll! [/ Quote]

[color = # 8000FF] i auch wirklich glauben, dass dies die Bedeutung der Mülltonnen ist;)
Zoom auf, warum es? weil es Müll ...[/ color] [/ quote]

Exactly I also think that this the meaning could be for the rubbish.
That is stressed the rubbish at sovielen places, is this all one garbage. ;)
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline TheKingWillReturn

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 200

Re: Child support hearing - fake?

  • on: December 19, 2009, 09:12:04 PM
Conrad Murray is due to go back to "Court" on 18th of Jan, Isn't he or am i mistaken, Well i noticed the date Michael divorced Lisa Marie... 18th of Jan... A lot of dates are being repeated in this hoax.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline lookingforthetroot

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 117

Re: Child support hearing - fake?

  • on: January 03, 2010, 01:38:40 AM
Ok I came across another hoax video showing that Dr Murrays girlfriend's lawyer was also at
Micheal funeral.. Hmmmmmm

sorry I still dont know how to post a Ytube video it still doesnt work for me

ThePatie7 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=12DQ-ojrVlQ

Trial is a hoax and lawyer is strange video
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline susie_23

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 240

Re: Child support hearing - fake?

  • on: January 04, 2010, 01:03:50 PM
Still nothing regarding the court hearing that was scheduled for today. Nothing on CNN, TMZ, PITNB or Perez Hilton.
Hmm.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

In one blink I’ll disappear, and then I’ll come back to haunt you
What you have just witnessed could be the end of a particularly terrifying nightmare.
It isn’t. It’s the beginning.

Offline SeeingClues

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 91
    • http://www.twitter.com/SeeingClues

Re: Child support hearing - fake?

  • on: January 04, 2010, 01:13:04 PM
at the end of the last hearing the judge ordered Murray back on court on 1/4 and Murray's lawyer said, "He'll be here"...

perhaps a question for TMZ live..

unless the child's mother is forgiving all future payments and Murray is off the hook...she already forgave $13,000 in child support.  

Oh, the oddities never cease!
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Share The Light
twitter.com/SeeingClues

Offline Iused2dream

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 300

Re: Child support hearing - fake?

  • on: January 04, 2010, 01:49:18 PM
Does anyone recall the case # for this child support case?  I can't seem to find anything on Clark County court site regarding this case when searching Conrad Murray (only finding a lot of old creditors claims!!)
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline SeeingClues

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 91
    • http://www.twitter.com/SeeingClues

Re: Child support hearing - fake?

  • on: January 04, 2010, 01:50:41 PM
I don't even think the hearing on 11/16 was listed in there... perhaps they only list real hearings? :D
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Share The Light
twitter.com/SeeingClues

Offline Iused2dream

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 300

Re: Child support hearing - fake?

  • on: January 04, 2010, 01:51:43 PM
Quote from: "SeeingClues"
I don't even think the hearing on 11/16 was listed in there... perhaps they only list real hearings? :D
I had a feeling you might reply to my comment  ;) ..my thoughts exactly but always researching, ya know!
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline angelshadow

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 8257

Re: Child support hearing - fake?

  • on: January 04, 2010, 02:16:57 PM
It was so played! Wen Interested to the delay in payment??
This is ridiculous ..... Murray would normally other charges :!:
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline sweet1

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 312

Re: Child support hearing - fake?

  • on: January 06, 2010, 06:56:10 PM
Well! last night (Jan 5th) when I was watching CNN the updated ticker at the bottom of the screen said that Michael Jackson's doc evades prison because child support payments have been paid. Okay! I guess he finally got his fat check from his part in the HOAX. What a crock! This man will never go to prison for anything as far as I am concerned. Keep the Faith!
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Em

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 77

Re: Child support hearing - fake?

  • on: January 23, 2010, 10:50:20 PM
Come on now, does someone just hand over $700 in cash in the courtroom like that? I liked how the camera zoomed into the money. That seemed strange. It was 7 hundred! There's that 7 again.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline JACKSONGIRL

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 809

Re: Child support hearing - fake?

  • on: January 23, 2010, 10:52:03 PM
Quote from: "Yas"
As xirisjex suggested maybe this really deserves it's own thread, so... here it is:

Quote from: "Kirsche"
Quote from: "Yas"
I'm not sure if this was posted already... Sorry if it was...

*Michael...L.O.V.E.*            November 25th, 2009 2:56 am ET

@everyone

People wake up! The judge who supposedly appeared and heard the Conrad Murray child support Las Vegas hearing last week actually retired back in July 2008.

Judge Gerald Hardcastle retired July 1, 2008!


WTF??


That's true!

Saturday, April 19, 2008
JUDGE GERALD HARDCASTLE RETIRES
KLAS has reported that Family Court Judge Gerald Hardcastle is retiring. Judge Hardcastle, who is one of the original Family Court Judges, will leave the bench on July 1st, 2008. The Nevada Supreme Court is currently accepting applications for the appointment of a replacement to serve out Judge Hardcastle's term.


But that doesn't proof, that he's michael but it Proof's that this Murray Child Support thing was a fake
Obviously it was a fake conrad urray isn't even his real name lol how can you have a court hearing under a false name?
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
I LOVE THIS BOY !!
My Heart Belongs To Michael Joseph Jackson!

Offline simplyme

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 649

Re: Child support hearing - fake?

  • on: February 01, 2010, 12:09:14 AM
The judge filled in for the other judge and I don't really recall the circumstances.  there was something in the news about it but I've yet to find the link again.  It might have something to do with this which I found on Wikipedia.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Kirsche

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 2082
    • http://www.myspace.com/chrischl

Re: Child support hearing - fake?

  • on: February 01, 2010, 02:25:19 PM
And the other thing that convinced me, that this hearing is fake was the money!

Is it usual to pay the money right there in court?

But another thing!
 The face on the money is GILDA! ( the woman of the Smooth Criminal short film)!

It totally looks like her.

There's video out there...but I can't find it anymore it proves that the money there is fake!
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
[
OKAY, EVERBODY! THAT\'S A WRAP!

Offline i_need YoU

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 933

Re: Child support hearing - fake?

  • on: February 01, 2010, 02:40:50 PM
the reason why the media or no judges or anyone steps forward and says wait a minute! is because everything the media says people assume it must be true...they probably were like saying "i thought he was retired" but when the news media announces there was a child support case they change their mind and say " oh i guess i was mistaken" THE MEDIA IS TAKING AWAY OUR VOICE AND OUR OPINIONS THEY HAVE TOO MUCH POWER AND THIS MUST CHANGE!
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline starlight30

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 193

Re: Child support hearing - fake?

  • on: February 05, 2010, 02:10:05 PM
Yesterday on Fox News they were talking about Murray and replayed the the child support hearing tape. Are those cases usually taped anyway? I don't see why they would be. They showed Murray's watch which is an interesting detail.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

 

SimplePortal 2.3.6 © 2008-2014, SimplePortal