Janet Jackson, Others Family Members Barred From Mom’s California Home

  • 15 Replies
  • 1347 Views

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline MaryK

  • *
  • Registered users
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 1732
  • The world is just illusion, trying to change you
More drama  :icon_rolleyes:  :icon_lol:

http://rolandmartinreports.com/blog/2012/07/roland-s-martin-exclusive-janet-jackson-others-family-members-barred-from-moms-california-home/

By Roland S. Martin
Editor-in-Chief
RolandMartinReports.com

The executors of Michael Jackson’s estate have barred a number of the late singer’s siblings, including Janet Jackson, from the California home where their mother, Katherine, is raising the late singers three children.

The details of who is and isn’t allowed onto the Calabas, California is detailed in an email obtained by CNN’s Roland S. Martin.

Howard Weitzman, who represents John McClain and John Branca, sent the email Wednesday to Charles Schultz, an attorney for Mrs. Jackson.

Weitzman writes that after the drama over the last two weeks, which including allegations that Katherine Jackson had gone missing for 10 days and was unable to reach Paris, Prince and Blanket Jackson, which led to her having to share guardianship of the children with another grandchild, TJ Jackson, it is necessary to bar certain family and friends from the property.

“Given the circumstances of the last two weeks, and in order to protect the children and Mrs. Jackson, the Executors believe that it would not be appropriate to allow the following individuals to enter the residence or its grounds and we instruct the security to preclude the following from entering the residence or the grounds: Randy Jackson and any of his children, Janet Jackson, Rebbie Jackson and any of her children, Jermaine Jackson, his wife and any of his children, Janice Smith, or anyone else who was involved in the recent events that led to Mrs. Jackson’s separation from and inability to communicate with Michael’s children, or any agents or representatives of any of these individuals,” Weitzman wrote.

“There will be no other security or drivers allowed on the property except those employed by the Estate of Michael Jackson. Joe Jackson is precluded from entering the property. Howard Mann who is in litigation against the Estate and is working with the Jackson siblings that wrote the “letter” should also not be allowed on the premises.”

The “letter” Weitzman is referring to is the one signed by Randy, Janet, Jermaine, Rebbie and Tito Jackson, alleging that the 2002 will authorizing Branca and McClain to be the executors of estate is fraudulent. Tito later apologized for signing the letter.

“Of course, Paris, Prince and Blanket, T.J. and his brothers, Tito, Marlon, Jackie and their spouses, current security (hired by the Estate), staff (per T.J.), Meg Lodise, Michael Kane, Sandra Ribera, Parry Sanders, Trent Jackson, you (Charles Shultz) and anyone else authorized by T.J. (other than the Excluded Individuals listed above), may enter and remain on the premises,” Weitzman wrote.

Weitzman’s email does not mention Michael’s sister, LaToya, and whether she can visit the property. She has publicly called on her family to stop the infighting.

According to a Jackson family source, the estate is allowed to make such demands because it pays the monthly lease payment on the Calabas home. Katherine Jackson controls the $70,000 monthly stipend the estate allocates to each Jackson child – a total of $210,000 – any way she sees fit, including school costs and other expenses.

Katherine Jackson is currently in the process of trying to purchase the home so the estate won’t be able to dictate such terms, the source said.

Weitzman writes that if law enforcement needs to be made of the letter, Schultz, T.J. Jackson or anyone else is authorized to show it to them.

“It is imperative to the Estate that from this point forward a safe and appropriate environment be provided for Michael Jackson’s children and his mother as well,” Weitzman wrote.
You and I were never separate

It's just an illusion

Wrought by the magical lens of Perception



Offline bec

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Minion Reserve
  • Posts: 6387
    • Exploring The Hoax
Just like how Randy and Joe and Jermaine all said they were barred from seeing Michael in the months before his "death".
Are you entertained?

Offline Sarahli

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 4265
  • Love is the answer.
Here is the email in its entirety:

Howard Weitzman's e-mail:

Quote
Given the circumstances of the last two weeks, and in order to protect the children and Mrs. Jackson, the Executors believe that it would not be appropriate to allow the following individuals to enter the residence or its grounds and we instruct the security to preclude the following from entering the residence or the grounds: Randy Jackson and any of his children, Janet Jackson, Rebbie Jackson and any of her children, Jermaine Jackson, his wife and any of his children, Janice Smith, or anyone else who was involved in the recent events that led to Mrs. Jackson’s separation from and inability to communicate with Michael’s children, or any agents or representatives of any of these individuals.

There will be no other security or drivers allowed on the property except those employed by the Estate of Michael Jackson. Joe Jackson is precluded from entering the property. Howard Mann who is in litigation against the Estate and is working with the Jackson siblings that wrote the “letter” should also not be allowed on the premises.

Of course, Paris, Prince and Blanket, T.J. and his brothers, Tito, Marlon, Jackie and their spouses, current security (hired by the Estate), staff (per T.J.), Meg Lodise, Michael Kane, Sandra Ribera, Parry Sanders, Trent Jackson, you (Charles Shultz) and anyone else authorized by T.J. (other than the Excluded individuals listed above), may enter and remain on the premises.

It is imperative to the Estate that from this point forward a safe and appropriate environment be provided for Michael Jackson’s children and his mother as well.
We are here for you Michael and will always love you whatever happens.
'Love the Lord your God with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your mind.'
"You shall not accept any information, unless you verify it for yourself. I have given you the hearing, the eyesight, and the brain, and you are responsible for using them."

Offline suspicious mind

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 5984
  • reading between the li_es
are we not entering a time when these two sides are going to have to start backing up their allegations with some proof or risk being accused of slander? just wondering . :screaming-7365:
"I am sending you out like sheep among wolves. Therefore be shrewd as serpents and as innocent as doves."  




Why not just tell people I'm an alien from Mars? Tell them I eat live chickens and do a voodoo dance at midnight. They'll believe anything you say, because you're a reporter. But if I, Michael Jackson, were to say, "I'm an alien from Mars and I eat live chickens and do a voodoo dance at midnight," people would say, "Oh, man, that Michael Jackson is nuts. He's cracked up. You can't believe a single word that comes out of his mouth."

Offline JesusLover05

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 73
I think it is unfair that the estate bar family members from seeing family members. Family is family. And if a family member wants to see a certain family member, they have the right to do so.

Offline suspicious mind

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 5984
  • reading between the li_es
i don't think that is what this means. they are only saying they cannot come on the property. otherwise it would be restraining orders and i don't think they have that power.
"I am sending you out like sheep among wolves. Therefore be shrewd as serpents and as innocent as doves."  




Why not just tell people I'm an alien from Mars? Tell them I eat live chickens and do a voodoo dance at midnight. They'll believe anything you say, because you're a reporter. But if I, Michael Jackson, were to say, "I'm an alien from Mars and I eat live chickens and do a voodoo dance at midnight," people would say, "Oh, man, that Michael Jackson is nuts. He's cracked up. You can't believe a single word that comes out of his mouth."

Offline voiceforthesilent

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 5485
Thank you for sharing this with us.

@Bec - I was thinking the same thing. In fact, I think Janet said she was also barred or was that LaToya. What is interesting is that they are banning Jermaine's children yet don't some of them live with her still? I know they and their mother "supposedly" are living in the Condo (also owned by the Estate) but I thought there were some living under that roof (Maybe Genavieve?). If so I wonder if any non-believers will notice.

I think this parallels those allegations that Michael was being kept from his family by people the family wouldn't name. Interesting too that it was long said that the security were the ones who denied access and that is what is going to happen here too. Smoke and mirrors to make someone believe they are being controlled?

Blessings
I'm proud to be a child of God and a member of MJ's Army of L.O.V.E.
 
"Press coverage of my life is like [watching] a fictitious movie...like watching science fiction. It's not true." ~Michael Jackson (2005)

"You should not believe everything you read. You are missing the most important revelations". Craig Harvey 3-15-2012

Offline voiceforthesilent

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 5485
I agree Suspicious_Mind - I'd think that this would be overstepping the authority that the Estate has unless they go for restraining orders..

I didn't know that Katherine was supposedly getting 70,000 per child...in addition to what she gets? If this were real I can't imagine anyone having a problem with that arrangement. Mind you, the housing, utilities, etc., are all exempt from this amount. Also, the will was questioned since the beginning. So, the family decides to act now? It's a ruse.

According to a Jackson family source, the estate is allowed to make such demands because it pays the monthly lease payment on the Calabas home. Katherine Jackson controls the $70,000 monthly stipend the estate allocates to each Jackson child – a total of $210,000 – any way she sees fit, including school costs and other expenses.

I'm proud to be a child of God and a member of MJ's Army of L.O.V.E.
 
"Press coverage of my life is like [watching] a fictitious movie...like watching science fiction. It's not true." ~Michael Jackson (2005)

"You should not believe everything you read. You are missing the most important revelations". Craig Harvey 3-15-2012

Offline 2good2btrue

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • FORGIVENESS IS THE KEY TO YOUR HAPPINESS
  • Posts: 4210
I agree Suspicious_Mind - I'd think that this would be overstepping the authority that the Estate has unless they go for restraining orders..

I didn't know that Katherine was supposedly getting 70,000 per child...in addition to what she gets? If this were real I can't imagine anyone having a problem with that arrangement. Mind you, the housing, utilities, etc., are all exempt from this amount. Also, the will was questioned since the beginning. So, the family decides to act now? It's a ruse.

According to a Jackson family source, the estate is allowed to make such demands because it pays the monthly lease payment on the Calabas home. Katherine Jackson controls the $70,000 monthly stipend the estate allocates to each Jackson child – a total of $210,000 – any way she sees fit, including school costs and other expenses.

But according to this email, Katherine is planning to buy the Calabasas property so that the estate has no more control over her, and who is allowed to visit...

Is it normal for an estate to have that sort of power???  I know they are looking out for the intersest of PPB and Katherine, but just far are they allowed to go??

Nobody owns the Jacksons, but for whatever reason, this time it has backfired...

Is this legal??

Offline Australian MJ BeLIEver

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 2632
@2good, JMO but I dont believe the estate really has any control over Katherine. I dont believe that there is an us and them situation. We cant look at this like a standard estate / probate arrangement or situation, because the deceased isnt really deceased. So in this case I'd say, the "Estate" really isnt really in effect or in existence in comparison to normal situations, where until will finalised and completely distributed, is usually directed by exectutors of the estate. Because Michael is alive, I think technicaly he is controlling the estate, but under the guise of the tpublicly appointed executors. This only makes sense and is agreeable, though if one were to concur that McClain and Branca are in on it, which obviously I think they are.  :icon_mrgreen:

I have no conclusive proof of this, its just what I imagine the situation to be becuase Michael is alive.

Hope what I am trying to say is articulated right, lol, as I am confusing myself by the way I am writing it LOL ...  :icon_lol:




People laugh when I explain. And though they may laugh, that doesn't change the fact that it's still the truth.


Michael is Alive
The end of evil is nigh
Trust in God
The righteous will prevail

Offline Australian MJ BeLIEver

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 2632

Yes, Voice, you are spot on! It's a ruse!


People laugh when I explain. And though they may laugh, that doesn't change the fact that it's still the truth.


Michael is Alive
The end of evil is nigh
Trust in God
The righteous will prevail

Offline blankie

  • *
  • Registered users
  • Hoaxer
  • It's all for L.O.V.E.
  • Posts: 2350
I agree Suspicious_Mind - I'd think that this would be overstepping the authority that the Estate has unless they go for restraining orders..

I didn't know that Katherine was supposedly getting 70,000 per child...in addition to what she gets? If this were real I can't imagine anyone having a problem with that arrangement. Mind you, the housing, utilities, etc., are all exempt from this amount. Also, the will was questioned since the beginning. So, the family decides to act now? It's a ruse.

According to a Jackson family source, the estate is allowed to make such demands because it pays the monthly lease payment on the Calabas home. Katherine Jackson controls the $70,000 monthly stipend the estate allocates to each Jackson child – a total of $210,000 – any way she sees fit, including school costs and other expenses.

But according to this email, Katherine is planning to buy the Calabasas property so that the estate has no more control over her, and who is allowed to visit...

Is it normal for an estate to have that sort of power???  I know they are looking out for the intersest of PPB and Katherine, but just far are they allowed to go??

Nobody owns the Jacksons, but for whatever reason, this time it has backfired...

Is this legal??

Is all very very strange....but....  :icon_bounce: is a film...a great film !!!  :michael-jackson:
LOVE YOU MORE

Offline sweetsunsetwithMJ

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 2626
  • Michael I am looking forward to your BAM!!
@2good, JMO but I dont believe the estate really has any control over Katherine. I dont believe that there is an us and them situation. We cant look at this like a standard estate / probate arrangement or situation, because the deceased isnt really deceased. So in this case I'd say, the "Estate" really isnt really in effect or in existence in comparison to normal situations, where until will finalised and completely distributed, is usually directed by exectutors of the estate. Because Michael is alive, I think technicaly he is controlling the estate, but under the guise of the tpublicly appointed executors. This only makes sense and is agreeable, though if one were to concur that McClain and Branca are in on it, which obviously I think they are.  :icon_mrgreen:

I have no conclusive proof of this, its just what I imagine the situation to be becuase Michael is alive.

Hope what I am trying to say is articulated right, lol, as I am confusing myself by the way I am writing it LOL ...  :icon_lol:

It's very clear what you are trying to explain honey, and that makes total sense to me, don't worry.
I WANNA BE WHERE YOU ARE!!

Offline mrbigshot

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 456
It astounds me how oblivious the general public is. how  Blatantly obvious does this hoax have to get to bring to fruition? Michael dies, and suddenly the family goes through a multitude of issues, perpetuating chaotic altercations? Okay first off, if michael really did die, and yes i get that we are all human, and it is only human nature to retaliate when faced with confrontation, but seriously. I think people for the most part forget that michael said his family are extremely close and they would refrain from this type of altercation. I mean, Katherine purported missing, family in incessant turmoil? a fight brakes out? and that's excluding the circus of the conrad murray trial, which perfectly encapsulates sensationalism in every aspect of media. I like the movie, I really do. but come on, i tmakes me wonder if the general public is seriously dimwitted (no offense, of course) and they seriously don't have the intellect to use a minimal amount of brain power and research this phenomena that is the hoax.


Coming soon to a trial near you; MJ: the resurrection

Offline wishingstar

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 2927
@mrbigshot.....
".....general public is seriously dimwitted......"
 :icon_lol:
Sure does seem that way at times! 

*great to see you around, btw

Blessings!


Offline suspicious mind

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 5984
  • reading between the li_es
It astounds me how oblivious the general public is. how  Blatantly obvious does this hoax have to get to bring to fruition? Michael dies, and suddenly the family goes through a multitude of issues, perpetuating chaotic altercations? Okay first off, if michael really did die, and yes i get that we are all human, and it is only human nature to retaliate when faced with confrontation, but seriously. I think people for the most part forget that michael said his family are extremely close and they would refrain from this type of altercation. I mean, Katherine purported missing, family in incessant turmoil? a fight brakes out? and that's excluding the circus of the conrad murray trial, which perfectly encapsulates sensationalism in every aspect of media. I like the movie, I really do. but come on, i tmakes me wonder if the general public is seriously dimwitted (no offense, of course) and they seriously don't have the intellect to use a minimal amount of brain power and research this phenomena that is the hoax.

i did happen to be in our work break room with the girl i went to see tii with when some news came on about it and she turned to me and ask what was goin on so maybe people are just not seeing the details if they are not watching for stuff.
"I am sending you out like sheep among wolves. Therefore be shrewd as serpents and as innocent as doves."  




Why not just tell people I'm an alien from Mars? Tell them I eat live chickens and do a voodoo dance at midnight. They'll believe anything you say, because you're a reporter. But if I, Michael Jackson, were to say, "I'm an alien from Mars and I eat live chickens and do a voodoo dance at midnight," people would say, "Oh, man, that Michael Jackson is nuts. He's cracked up. You can't believe a single word that comes out of his mouth."

 

SimplePortal 2.3.6 © 2008-2014, SimplePortal