0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Given the circumstances of the last two weeks, and in order to protect the children and Mrs. Jackson, the Executors believe that it would not be appropriate to allow the following individuals to enter the residence or its grounds and we instruct the security to preclude the following from entering the residence or the grounds: Randy Jackson and any of his children, Janet Jackson, Rebbie Jackson and any of her children, Jermaine Jackson, his wife and any of his children, Janice Smith, or anyone else who was involved in the recent events that led to Mrs. Jackson’s separation from and inability to communicate with Michael’s children, or any agents or representatives of any of these individuals.There will be no other security or drivers allowed on the property except those employed by the Estate of Michael Jackson. Joe Jackson is precluded from entering the property. Howard Mann who is in litigation against the Estate and is working with the Jackson siblings that wrote the “letter” should also not be allowed on the premises.Of course, Paris, Prince and Blanket, T.J. and his brothers, Tito, Marlon, Jackie and their spouses, current security (hired by the Estate), staff (per T.J.), Meg Lodise, Michael Kane, Sandra Ribera, Parry Sanders, Trent Jackson, you (Charles Shultz) and anyone else authorized by T.J. (other than the Excluded individuals listed above), may enter and remain on the premises.It is imperative to the Estate that from this point forward a safe and appropriate environment be provided for Michael Jackson’s children and his mother as well.
I agree Suspicious_Mind - I'd think that this would be overstepping the authority that the Estate has unless they go for restraining orders.. I didn't know that Katherine was supposedly getting 70,000 per child...in addition to what she gets? If this were real I can't imagine anyone having a problem with that arrangement. Mind you, the housing, utilities, etc., are all exempt from this amount. Also, the will was questioned since the beginning. So, the family decides to act now? It's a ruse.According to a Jackson family source, the estate is allowed to make such demands because it pays the monthly lease payment on the Calabas home. Katherine Jackson controls the $70,000 monthly stipend the estate allocates to each Jackson child – a total of $210,000 – any way she sees fit, including school costs and other expenses.
You are not allowed to view links. Register or LoginI agree Suspicious_Mind - I'd think that this would be overstepping the authority that the Estate has unless they go for restraining orders.. I didn't know that Katherine was supposedly getting 70,000 per child...in addition to what she gets? If this were real I can't imagine anyone having a problem with that arrangement. Mind you, the housing, utilities, etc., are all exempt from this amount. Also, the will was questioned since the beginning. So, the family decides to act now? It's a ruse.According to a Jackson family source, the estate is allowed to make such demands because it pays the monthly lease payment on the Calabas home. Katherine Jackson controls the $70,000 monthly stipend the estate allocates to each Jackson child – a total of $210,000 – any way she sees fit, including school costs and other expenses.But according to this email, Katherine is planning to buy the Calabasas property so that the estate has no more control over her, and who is allowed to visit...Is it normal for an estate to have that sort of power??? I know they are looking out for the intersest of PPB and Katherine, but just far are they allowed to go?? Nobody owns the Jacksons, but for whatever reason, this time it has backfired...Is this legal??
@2good, JMO but I dont believe the estate really has any control over Katherine. I dont believe that there is an us and them situation. We cant look at this like a standard estate / probate arrangement or situation, because the deceased isnt really deceased. So in this case I'd say, the "Estate" really isnt really in effect or in existence in comparison to normal situations, where until will finalised and completely distributed, is usually directed by exectutors of the estate. Because Michael is alive, I think technicaly he is controlling the estate, but under the guise of the tpublicly appointed executors. This only makes sense and is agreeable, though if one were to concur that McClain and Branca are in on it, which obviously I think they are. :icon_mrgreen:I have no conclusive proof of this, its just what I imagine the situation to be becuase Michael is alive.Hope what I am trying to say is articulated right, lol, as I am confusing myself by the way I am writing it LOL ... :icon_lol: