0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Thanks for posting 2Good......Pellicano, Fields and Weitzman. How I've longed to understand exactly who was behind that initial set up of Michael in '93. Twiggy said this is far bigger than we all thought. I think she has that right.
You are not allowed to view links. Register or LoginThanks for posting 2Good......Pellicano, Fields and Weitzman. How I've longed to understand exactly who was behind that initial set up of Michael in '93. Twiggy said this is far bigger than we all thought. I think she has that right. :icon_eek: :icon_eek: :icon_e_surprised:
You are not allowed to view links. Register or LoginThanks for posting 2Good......Pellicano, Fields and Weitzman. How I've longed to understand exactly who was behind that initial set up of Michael in '93. Twiggy said this is far bigger than we all thought. I think she has that right.as hideous and malicious as Sneddon is / was - I do believe he was a relatively a small fish in the bigger picture.
Interesting is the link Sneddon has with David Schwartz, who was Jordie Chandler’s stepfather during the 1993 allegations. Normally that could be a coincidence, but the fact that during his testimony at a pre-trial hearing Sneddon admitted to having met with the Janet Arvizo before the second accusations makes us think this was all planned. But what would Sneddon gain from all this? Did he hate Mike? And why? Justice was not a motive, because both cases were doomed to be lost by him, because he had NOTHING. Fame could be a motive, but who wants to be known for nailing the most famous and loved person in the world? That seems a little strange. So it must be money. Since we don’t believe that Sneddon’s paycheck was that big, he must have been paid by other parties. But by who? Who would gain enough by getting rid of Mike?You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
Big question is: WHO gains the most by getting rid of Michael Jackson?
Here is a Q for you Souza, that I have been wondering some time and now that we are discussing this, its a perfect opportunity to ask. Do you think MJ knew before 93 his head was wanted? Or, that his head was even wanted by the people / person / powers behind sneddon? If not, at what point in time do you think it was before it became apparent to him that Sneddon was just a small fry in this situation and that he was a tool in a bigger agenda? Post 93, there was a clear change in MJ regards to his military / mutiny style campaining backlash against the molestation / media camp. (I am talking about via songs, music videos - the angry MJ emerged & rightly so) But yeah keen on your thoughts on this.