0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Well...... first of all id like to thank you all for reading and sharing your thoughts on my postand this subject. Souza is right it can go all day becauae we all think we r right hahajaha......In the end it doesnt matter if its a double or not ehat matters is WHY do that for this film??
@ mack... just look at what our feuding has started lol....i love mj for giving us this hoax. the fact that we are all divided and still speaking about it 3 years later and still learning, shows that whatever he did, whether it be act as an impersonator or deployed his impersonators - it worked as we are still guessing!!!i guess though in the scheme of things, its probably the least important (yet one of the intriguing!) amongst everything in this hoax, in terms of significance.most important thing is love, just as michael says L.O.V.E - the rest is just pure genius / entertainment at its best!!L.O.V.E to all and thank you for contributing to this thread.by the way mack, i know you havent been here too long. there are some great threads from the past that you might be interested in concerning TII, not just doubles but also clues / messages, etc. the board is here You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login some go back to 2010. i found them great to read over even though much of the discussion happened prior to me joining the forum@ wishingstar personally JMO, i think that "No no no no - I gotta conserve my voice / i shouldnt be singing MJ" - is not MJ - upon re: watching TII yesterday.. but really liked your previous post :-) and agree with you xx
I love these conversations! I've been on both sides of the fence .... and on top .... and back again!Do you know what I just realised? It used to matter to me, it used to be important to me to know who was or wasn't MJ, I didn't want to be 'fooled' or 'tricked'. Now I find it quite amusing! Hats off to MJ for weaving this nice little aside into his master plan!I think O2 MJ is the real deal because of very subtle mannerisms that he didn't manage to avoid in his 'I'm going to play this a bit off' performance!I think TII MJ is mostly the real deal, possibly even all, with the same deliberate 'off' performances, but could be doubles - IDK. I've watched it so many times that the 'doubles' are so familiar now, they don't seem so 'off' any more - I've grown to love them!If I eventually find out I am totally wrong, and it was all doubles, it really won't matter - I will laugh and applaud MJ for the drama and controversy and trouble he's caused!! But I admit I'll laugh and applaud more if it was all him! (One question: if he wanted to use 'stand-ins' so he could see from the audience's point of view, how things looked on stage, would he need to go to the trouble of finding lookalikes or doubles? Wouldn't Travis, say in shades and an MJ jacket, suffice? To me, another reason to believe TII was not genuine rehearsal footage, but was always intended to be a movie - of MJ!)
I will appreciate if you post those pics so we can close this issue once and for all, the theory of two Michaels could be possible too so if we see those pics we can compare them here.