0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.
Thanks paula. :icon_mrgreen: Once again, I wonder if the triable claim for the trial is an "out" for AEG - so they are no longer answerable for the dismissed claims.Can dismissed claims still be brought up in the trial, as they may have to do with the triable claim?
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login Thanks paula. :icon_mrgreen: Once again, I wonder if the triable claim for the trial is an "out" for AEG - so they are no longer answerable for the dismissed claims.Can dismissed claims still be brought up in the trial, as they may have to do with the triable claim? :confused:
Too funny hes :thjajaja121:It seems like we already know (or they are hinting at) what the outcome of this trial is going to be............But may be we should not be concentrating on the outcome of the trial, but the trial itself.......I mean may be during this trial that's supposed to start on April 1st, the truth will be revealed and a lot of questions will be answered, questions that did not get answered during Murray's trial........
In the two days we've been offline (anyone know what that was all about??) I've been looking at stuff relating to this trial. I found this summary which may be of interest: You are not allowed to view links. Register or LoginN.B. The case number is BC445597 which it doesn't seem to remember, so I think you have to type it in each time you visit the page.
You are not allowed to view links. Register or LoginIn the two days we've been offline (anyone know what that was all about??) I've been looking at stuff relating to this trial. I found this summary which may be of interest: You are not allowed to view links. Register or LoginN.B. The case number is BC445597 which it doesn't seem to remember, so I think you have to type it in each time you visit the page.To see it you have to click "Beverly Hills Courthouse".Very interesting, thanks for sharing Curls.