0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
MJJC: Are you aware that the internet blog where Jordan Chandler retracted his allegations against Michael is a hoax? In TV interviews you and Mrs Jackson when defending Michael from the child abuse allegations use this argument to prove Michael's innocence and because it is false it has the opposite effect of making viewers continue to question the accusations against Michael. There are so many good arguments to support Michael's innocence and it is extremely frustrating for fans and extremely damaging towards your brother when an argument which is clearly a lie is used.Jermaine Jackson: I don't know what Internet blog is being referred to?? I think that's as good as any argument can get!Michael's attorney Tom had a witness that was prepared to testify that Jordan Chandler had told him the allegations were untrue (should he have appeared as a witness in 2005) The boy had privately retracted it, and Tom was going to prove it.
But I'm of the vision that this stain too shall be removed in due course. In fact, I have intuition that the subject of the first narrative has already, years ago, righted that wrong behind the scenes. For that individual, or even those of his acquaintance, who are ambivalent about the "open" approach & legalities, these initials (T-M) are your "key"! Trust ME!
Jermaine said MJ was dying months before he 'died' but they didn't realise so couldn't stop it. Yet, in another sentence he said MJ was fit and ready to do the concerts.