0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
From Larry King Live Transcript, CNN, November 18, 2009-
RK,Synchronicity...I too have been thinking about Grace. I was trying to look into Nanny Grace for more recent news yesterday but wasn't able to find anything....(still off topic, sorry)
You are not allowed to view links. Register or LoginRK,Synchronicity...I too have been thinking about Grace. I was trying to look into Nanny Grace for more recent news yesterday but wasn't able to find anything....(still off topic, sorry)add me to that synchronicity line
I really don't know what to make of Thome. He can be the bad guy or the good guy. If he is the bad guy why wasn't he at the trial and why was he with Michael's "body" till they put him in the helicopter? If he is the good guy, why is the estate suing him and why Frank Cascio wrote those things about him?
“If Michael was as drugged as often as some reports now indicate,” says one person familiar with the estate proceedings, “then a reasonable question is whether his addiction made it easier for some to squander his money. If we don’t waste our time fighting over control of the estate, we can actually start to put all the pieces back together. It’s just the longer we wait, the harder it will be to find the wrongdoers.”
That article was a great refresher from a couple of years ago to now when we see things falling into place, slowly.I just cannot believe that Michael was that out of touch regarding money. There are even financial people who have stated that Michael was very astute when it came to finances. So which is it?I also have a hard time believing, still, that Michael was that drugged out. But everything is in such conflict that it's hard to know the truth. Either way, I think it's interesting, though, that Raymone Bain was denied her request for her share of the pie and now they are going after Thome Thome. I wish them, and Michael, victory.Quote“If Michael was as drugged as often as some reports now indicate,” says one person familiar with the estate proceedings, “then a reasonable question is whether his addiction made it easier for some to squander his money. If we don’t waste our time fighting over control of the estate, we can actually start to put all the pieces back together. It’s just the longer we wait, the harder it will be to find the wrongdoers.”
Michael Jackson's estate sues enigmatic former business managerThe late singer's representatives have started legal action against Dr Tohme Tohme, claiming Jackson's former spokesman and adviser 'duped' him into signing poor contractsSean Michaels guardian.co.uk, Monday 20 February 2012 13.16 GMTArticle historyMichael Jackson's estate is suing the singer's mysterious business manager, Dr Tohme Tohme. Eighteen months after Tohme himself sued the late singer's estate, accusing executors of withholding royalties, representatives of Jackson's estate have now petitioned to strip Tohme of the musician's property and financial records, as well as any right to his money."This lawsuit is necessary to finally put a stop to [Tohme's] abuse," according to court documents filed on 17 February, "[and] to unwind the self-serving and unconscionable agreements [Tohme] encouraged Jackson to enter into." Lawyers claim that Tohme "duped" his client into poor contracts, including an agreement to save the Neverland Ranch from foreclosure, collecting millions in consultancy fees.Little is known about Tohme, who was described in his own press releases as Jackson's "official and sole spokesperson". He worked for the pop star from January 2008 until March 2009. "I'm a nobody," Tohme said in a 2009 interview. "I'm not important." He also described himself as an "ambassador at large for Senegal".Tohme sued Jackson's estate in September 2010, shortly before the release of the documentary This Is It. Tohme was billed in the film credits as Jackson's "personal adviser". He is allegedly seeking 15% of the revenue collected by the estate, a sum amounting to almost $50m (