0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
David Icke and Alex Jones are not to be trusted.Do the research and digg deep.Evil uses truth with small lies and the small lies twist everything. Just as with Oprah, when will people learn But I went through that road a while back so everyone have their time and road to travel I like Ron Paul but I do not trust in the system.People should stop voting. Whoever comes next as president will become worse then those before him.Just wait and see...Always keep this in mind:- Those who creates the problem are also those who offer a solution and are also those who solve the problem - They give what the people wants which is actually what they themselves want.You want to get rid of the banking system, so u might get but in return there might be one world currency and currency only excisting in digital form. = NWO... Those in control will always be in control for as long as we play their game.
EU court: Web sites need not check for IP breaches Feb. 16, 2012, 8:40 a.m. EST AP BRUSSELS (AP) — A European Union court ruled Thursday that social networking sites cannot be compelled to install general filters to prevent the illegal trading of music and other copyrighted material.The decision is a victory for operators of social networking sites in the EU, but a setback for those who seek to protect copyrighted material from being distributed without payment or permission.It also comes as protests are growing in Europe against ACTA, the proposed international Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement, which is meant to protect intellectual property rights.In Thursday's decision, the EU Court of Justice, which is based in Luxembourg, ruled that requiring general filters that would cover all the site's users would not sufficiently protect personal data or the freedom to receive and impart information.SABAM, a Belgian company that represents authors, composers and music publishers, filed the lawsuit leading to Thursday's ruling. In it, the company objected to the practices of Netlog NV, a social networking site, saying users' profiles allowed protected works to be shared illegally.Michael Gardner, head of the intellectual property practice at London law firm Wedlake Bell, called the ruling a further blow to copyright owners because it appears to rule out forcing operators of social network sites and Internet service providers — at their own expense — to impose blanket monitoring and filtering aimed at stopping infringements.In November, SABAM lost a separate case in which it sought to require Internet service providers to install filters that would prevent the illegal downloading of files.Gardner said the ruling would not stop copyright owners from seeking more limited injunctions against social networking sites or Internet service providers, but he said the injunctions would have to be more "proportionate" in scope and effect."Under EU law, there has to be a balance between the interests of copyright owners and the rights of privacy and freedom of expression," he said. "So far, the courts seem to have rejected the draconian solutions urged on them by the rights owners."Mark Owen, head of the intellectual property practice at London law firm Harbottle & Lewis, said the new ruling shows how difficult it can be to protect intellectual property."As clouds continue to gather around Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement and other attempts to control online use of copyright works, today's ruling from the European Court provides a useful illustration of the practical challenges enforcement poses," Owen said.____Satter reported from London. Follow Don Melvin at You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
Everything needs to be put into perspective. As far as I can see? The "Illuminati" is all self-referential online, only going back 4 years.All the reference material, refers to itself! Offline, in books going back for a few centuries, they just don't exist, except in the 1970s as a trilogy called Illuminatus,or as a card game by Steve Jackson games called Illuminati.
NWO was seen as a GOOD thing, as the shape of things to come, after WW2! How countries would work together, instead of fighting! I see nothing wrongwith the concept, the way it was thought of.
John Robison, a professor of natural philosophy at Edinburgh University in Scotland and a member of a Freemason Lodge there, said he had been asked to join the Illuminati. After consideration he concluded that the Illuminati were not for him. In 1798 he published a book called Proofs of a Conspiracy in which he wrote: "An association has been formed for the express purposes of rooting out all the religious establishments and overturning all existing governments ... the leaders would rule the World with uncontrollable power, while all the rest would be employed as tools of the ambition of their unknown superiors."
i have my viewpoints on NWO. those who know me know my view... i just want to say no one here should say what is and what is not true, as no one definiteively knows all. to say something does or doesnt exist is not an educated statement, because there is much that the gov hides from us.whether that be illuminati /NWO or simply the illusion of illuminati / NWO to create fear and keep control, we dont know.hypothosies, hypertheticals, possible scanarios, ideas, etc are one thing. but to say without doubt that something does or doesnt exist, is foolish, regardless of which side you believe...as we are all in the dark, regardless of what version we believe or do not believe. therefore just as educated (or non educatedabout the truth) as a believer who believes the opposite of us, re: illuminati and NWOWE ARE ALL IN DARKNESS!!!!In conclusion, praise Jah, and may god bring a speedy end to this corrupt system!