Ron Paul & REVOLtion... Notice "LOVE" ... Michael's ....this is all for "LOVE"..

[LoveShyMichael]

AMEN!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!     I'm so glad at least 1 person sees that RON PAUL the only one at this point to make a difference, if he can make it too the president. Yes, the Iowa polls we're totally rigged, corrupt as HELL. As soon as I listened to that episode on Alex Jones about the rigging of the polls, I was absolutely furious. If if Ron Paul doesn't make it to president because the elite as scared as HELL. If he doesn't win, because of absolute fraud, he'll be too old to run after that. But his son who is a Senator I feel will step up. The media lately has been trying to attack Jesse VEntura also. There has been talk on Alex Jones of either Jesse Ventura running with Ron Paul as Vice-President, if Ron Paul makes it that far, without the help of corrupt officials trying to destroy him at every whim. I also feel either if Ron Paul doesn't make president, I feel Jesse Ventura will do it, because of the latest slur on Jesse Ventura, if the "media whores" thought that would surpess Ventura they we're sadly mistaken, this will make him fight even more to take back our country. Thanks for seeing the light. Now lets wake up others that Ron Paul is the savior for this country. With JFK, yes we all know our government killed him, but back then no one questioned their government. Today, thanks to Alex Jones, Ron Paul, Jesse Ventura, & others believiing in our freedom we will not be blinded.....at least I wont.

[LoveShyMichael]

Will Diebold Voting Machines Cheat Ron Paul Out Of 2nd Place In New Hampshire?
2008 scandal saw votes for Paul go uncounted

Paul Joseph Watson
Infowars.com
Monday, January 9, 2012

Given allegations of vote fraud in Iowa last week, in addition to the documented case of uncounted votes for Ron Paul during the 2008 New Hampshire primary, concerns are again running high amongst Ron Paul supporters that their candidate could be cheated out of a strong finish in Tuesday’s caucuses with the aid of notoriously suspect Diebold voting machines.

Although Mitt Romney is expected to comfortably win the primary tomorrow, current polls show Ron Paul maintaining a strong second place.

However, such polls counted for little in 2008, when despite Barack Obama’s huge 13 point lead over Hillary Clinton going into the Democratic primary, Clinton ended up winning by 3 per cent.

Ron Paul also found himself on the wrong end of suspected vote fraud when election officials in districts such as Sutton reported that Paul had received zero votes, despite numerous individuals immediately going public and asserting they had voted for Paul. Officials later had to admit that 31 votes for Paul in Sutton alone had not been counted due to “human error”.

In districts that used notoriously unreliable Diebold voting machines, Paul also received significantly less votes than establishment candidate Rudy Giuliani, despite beating him on votes case by paper ballot. Huge disparities between votes cast on Diebold electronic voting machines and actual hand counted tallies for the Democratic primary also emerged during the New Hampshire recount.

Mitt Romney profited the most from the Diebold swing in 2008, he received 7% more votes compared to hand counted ballots.

Paul supporters speculate that just as Rick Santorum enjoyed an astounding last minute surge in Iowa to take second place and enable the media to keep Ron Paul out of the headlines, John Huntsman will be used for the same purpose in New Hampshire.

“New Hampshire still uses the same institutionally vulnerable Diebold electronic voting machines as in 2008,” writes Dave Trotter . “So the odds of GOP establishment chicanery are even higher than in Iowa. After all, the establishment that Ron Paul threatens remains firmly in control of the levers and dials of the pollsters and the voting machines.”

“If Huntsman indeed serves the role of Romney-enabler in New Hampshire, as the new-new Flavor of the Month for the soon-to-be deposed Santorum, expect for him to yield to yet another establishment candidate by South Carolina. Perhaps Perry makes a momentary resurgence?”

Concerns about vote fraud being used to disenfranchise Ron Paul flared in Iowa last week after Republican strategist Dee Dee Benkie said GOP insiders had told her they would prevent Ron Paul winning the primary, namely by making sweetheart deals with voting blocs that would favor other candidates.

After the final vote tally was conducted at a secret undisclosed location, allegations of fraud emerged courtesy of a Ron Paul supporter in Appanoose County, who told an Iowa TV station that he believed there was a 20-vote discrepancy in the numbers he recorded from his caucus and the numbers that the Iowa Republican Party reported.

“When Mitt Romney won Iowa by eight votes and I’ve got a 20-vote discrepancy here, that right there says Rick Santorum won Iowa,” Edward True told KCCI TV. “Not Mitt Romney.”

Iowa election officials dismissed the allegations as “rumor” and “innuendo,” while the Santorum camp failed to make any challenge.

Concerns that the establishment is out to sabotage Ron Paul have been provoked by the media’s refusal to even acknowledge the existence of the Paul campaign. The latest example comes courtesy of CBS News, who excluded Paul from the results of a New Hampshire poll, both in graphics displayed on screen as well as on-air discussion, despite the fact that Paul finished second to Mitt Romney.

*********************

Paul Joseph Watson is the editor and writer for Prison Planet.com. He is the author of Order Out Of Chaos. Watson is also a regular fill-in host for The Alex Jones Show and Infiowars Nightly News.

[LoveShyMichael]

CBS Reporter Blatantly Excludes Ron Paul From Coverage

Despite the fact Paul is surging and Romney sliding, gap now only 15 points

Steve Watson
Infowars.com
January 9, 2012

Despite the fact that Ron Paul is polling in second place in New Hampshire, and rapidly closing the gap on Mitt Romney, according to the latest polls, one CBS reporter did her best to convince viewers that Paul does not even exist.

It’s a familiar picture for Paul supporters who have had to watch over and over as mainstream media talking heads and pundits have consistently either laughed off the Texas Congressman’s chances for GOP nominee or simply excluded Paul from their coverage altogether.

However, within the past few weeks, the networks were forced to begin taking Paul seriously as he began consistently polling in first and second ahead of the Iowa caucuses, eventually finishing third in what was essentially a three way tie.

Going into New Hampshire and ahead of two debates this weekend, Paul was polling in strong second, as he has been for some time. However, That did not stop CBS political correspondent Jan Crawford from showing graphics and talking about recent polling, without even mentioning Paul’s numbers or even that he was involved in the race at all.

Crawford even used a graphic referencing a Suffolk University Poll of New Hampshire voters, omitting Paul’s numbers, even though he came second, and was the only candidate other than Mitt Romney to poll in double figures.

Watch the video:



The video went viral over the weekend, with Paul supporters bombarding CBS with complaints.

“Your lack of integrity as a journalist is no longer in question, it is fact.” wrote on critic on Crawford’s Facebook page.

“Blatant manipulation of data to fabricate a news story instead of doing your job to report it disgusts me. Thank you, Jan Crawford, You make me feel like a better person,” the commenter added.

“Where is your on air apology? Are you going to own up to your blatant misrepresentation of the facts?” wrote another Paul supporter.

You call yourself a ‘political correspondent’?? Shame on you,” commented another.

In reality, Paul is actually rapidly closing the gap on Mitt Romney in New Hampshire. the latest Suffolk University/7NEWS tracking poll, released on Sunday, shows that Ron Paul has surged 6 percentage points since last week to 20 percent, while Romney has dropped 8 points since last Wednesday and now stands at 35 percent.

That means the gap between the two is now down to 15 points. John Huntsman is the only other candidate in double figures, at 11 percent. As many highlighted last week, Rick Santorum does not have the resources to compete beyond Iowa and resides in a lowly fifth place in New Hampshire.

Romney is likely to see his numbers drop even further following a lack luster performance in two debates on Saturday and Sunday. The Suffolk University/7News poll, conducted before the debates took place, puts the number of undecided voters at 15 percent.

You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login

[Tink]

I had to switch to being a Democrat, when I saw the insanity of the GOP had grown to bow to their fundamentalist extremist overlords. I did that with sadness, but I won't be bought.

I do feel strongly we need a third party system. Otherwise, I vote for the lesser of damage.

[LoveShyMichael]

I feel Ron Paul is using the Republican "status", just to keep in with the support. I still feel he's going to break off & run as independent.

[LoveShyMichael]

AMERICA can NOT have anymore of the same as this............

[anewfan]

I'm very impressed with Ron Paul. He has walked the walk and proven that he can't be bought. I love that he is honest and real.

 It's too bad that the cards are stacked against him because he actually WILL make changes and those calling the shots would never want that. I hope he runs as a 3rd party also.

[LoveShyMichael]

If Ron Paul doesn't make it to the presidency, we all know why. Yes, he's for US THE PEOPLE!!!

He's not accepted one penny from any Wall Street Cronies!!
The Elites' are running scared that America is waking up. But not fast enough. So spread the word.

[LoveShyMichael]

The media has tried to destroy Ron Paul, just like they also tried to do to Michael Jackson. Except this time, we won't stand for it.

[Sarahli]

The problem is the system in its entirety, it's nearly impossible for a "good guy" to be elected. It almost needs a miracle for things to really change at this point.

[Aidan_81]

It almost needs a miracle for things to really change at this point.

- agree. Only miracle can change things now    and I doubt what people think is "good guy"
is that good. Time will show, real soon.

[Tink]

If Ron Paul breaks off and goes Indy, then he'll definitely lose! Take a look at WHO votes in the Electoral College!! What we do, matters for naught. Congress & Senate get to vote for President, after seeing who their constituents say.

That's how Bush stole his second term, because Public Vote is useless.

[Aidan_81]

That's how Bush stole his second term, because Public Vote is useless.

- please people tell me it was this way as I refuse to believe people actually voted for him
second time around! I mean, second time?! I still have faith in Americans as I always thought
his victory was artificially created. No way you voted like that, no way. /overreacting/

Imagine Paul wins, and imagine this changes nothing. This is my biggest concern.

[MJonmind]

It almost needs a miracle for things to really change at this point.

- agree. Only miracle can change things now    and I doubt what people think is "good guy"
is that good. Time will show, real soon.

Two sides of the same coin.  The same way 'they' set up Obama to be the under dog of a minority group--Afro-Americans, supposedly history in the making. But what did he really change--nothing--same old--same Zionism pulling the strings.   Ron Paul could be set up to look like the underdog, but watch out...

[LoveShyMichael]

Even though we all know how corrupt the system is, we still have to keep voicing our freedoms. If Ron Paul doesn't get in, his son is a Senator, & Jesse Ventura could be our next possible. But we've woken up many millions of people, we just have to keep exposing corruption even on a lower level like us going to town meetings or speaking up against TSA STICKING THEIR HANDS DOWN OUR KIDS PANTS. Everything helps.