Michael Jackson Autopsy Photo

[Bee Bee]

Is it actually normal for a dead body that is not in the state of rigor mortis yet to have its head hanging to the side? Would it have been impossible for his face to be facing the camera without help? I've honestly never seen a dead person, so I don't know.

[Suzy7]

 His position and even the wrist bands contradict the photo that was taken allegedly only moments before; the gurney photo.
His head went from being to the left facing the camera, to the right and slightly up. The wrist band changed, and the face changed. He went from having bare lips/no makeup, to having what appears to be makeup on.
If you go by the gurney photo, his lips and overall colouring of the body should have been a more grey/blue colour.

 On a side note, if anyone here has watched the Saw movies, the Jigsaw character dies in one of them and has an autopsy done. It looked EXACTLY like him and graphically real with his body having an overall grey/pale look. Anything could have been done in this photo.

[MissG]

Someone asked back on page 8 if we could compare the picture with MJ coming out of the pool. I did that and posted it last week in the TIAI thread, but I will post it here too. I altered the autopsy picture to make the size more believable, because I think they squeezed it and made the legs look shorter. Anyways, I think it's a match.

Looks like a true match. Still I would have liked to see his feet which seem to be big and one can´t appreciate that in the pics shown at court.

[all4loveandbelieve]

Michael was training with Lou Ferigno, there is no way that is Michael's body, where are the muscles.. He is a dancer, I am sure he continue dancing even if he did not perform.. No muscle mass, nothing. Just a plain straight body.. That is not Michael's body..

[Stillbelieve]

Michael was training with Lou Ferigno, there is no way that is Michael's body, where are the muscles.. He is a dancer, I am sure he continue dancing even if he did not perform.. No muscle mass, nothing. Just a plain straight body.. That is not Michael's body..

Muscle mass requires an excess of calories. And alot at that. My husband and son weight train and have been doing so for a number of years.  I started only 2 years ago, mainly for strength and body composition. It takes alot of dedication and hard work.  According to those around him Michael wasn't eating much.  It's impossible to build any noticeable visual muscle mass on the body without the excess of calories and the lifting of heavy weights on a regular basis. It also takes alot more time than the few months Michael was reportedly working out with Lou for. These things combined with adequate rest between workouts to allow the muscles time to grow and repair themselves are required to build muscle mass. Doing only one without the other will not give you any results. Michael danced alot also for rehesearls and day to day which would of burnt up most of the calories he did consumed anyway, leaving nothing for new growth of the muscles.  Eating too little and dancing too much would produce a body similar to the one we see in the autopsy picture.

[all4loveandbelieve]

Michael was training with Lou Ferigno, there is no way that is Michael's body, where are the muscles.. He is a dancer, I am sure he continue dancing even if he did not perform.. No muscle mass, nothing. Just a plain straight body.. That is not Michael's body..

Muscle mass requires an excess of calories. And alot at that. My husband and son weight train and have been doing so for a number of years.  I started only 2 years ago, mainly for strength and body composition. It takes alot of dedication and hard work.  According to those around him Michael wasn't eating much.  It's impossible to build any noticeable visual muscle mass on the body without the excess of calories and the lifting of heavy weights on a regular basis. It also takes alot more time than the few months Michael was reportedly working out with Lou for. These things combined with adequate rest between workouts to allow the muscles time to grow and repair themselves are required to build muscle mass. Doing only one without the other will not give you any results. Michael danced alot also for rehesearls and day to day which would of burnt up most of the calories he did consumed anyway, leaving nothing for new growth of the muscles.  Eating too little and dancing too much would produce a body similar to the one we see in the autopsy picture.

I know about body mass, my son is in body building competition, and I have been on a diet excersice I have lost 150 lbs. Protein is the key word. I know deep down Michael is eating well, Lou Ferigno said it himself. He was in great shape. I refuse to believe that, that is Michael's body in that gurney.  He  is still suppose to have some muscles at least like the picture he was coming out of the pool. This is not Michael.

[Stillbelieve]

Michael was training with Lou Ferigno, there is no way that is Michael's body, where are the muscles.. He is a dancer, I am sure he continue dancing even if he did not perform.. No muscle mass, nothing. Just a plain straight body.. That is not Michael's body..

Muscle mass requires an excess of calories. And alot at that. My husband and son weight train and have been doing so for a number of years.  I started only 2 years ago, mainly for strength and body composition. It takes alot of dedication and hard work.  According to those around him Michael wasn't eating much.  It's impossible to build any noticeable visual muscle mass on the body without the excess of calories and the lifting of heavy weights on a regular basis. It also takes alot more time than the few months Michael was reportedly working out with Lou for. These things combined with adequate rest between workouts to allow the muscles time to grow and repair themselves are required to build muscle mass. Doing only one without the other will not give you any results. Michael danced alot also for rehesearls and day to day which would of burnt up most of the calories he did consumed anyway, leaving nothing for new growth of the muscles.  Eating too little and dancing too much would produce a body similar to the one we see in the autopsy picture.

I know about body mass, my son is in body building competition, and I have been on a diet excersice I have lost 150 lbs. Protein is the key word. I know deep down Michael is eating well, Lou Ferigno said it himself. He was in great shape. I refuse to believe that, that is Michael's body in that gurney.  He  is still suppose to have some muscles at least like the picture he was coming out of the pool. This is not Michael.

My husband is a Lecturer but also a trainer too, so I understand what your saying. Muscle Mass is lost with age, unless you do the correct exercising and eating to maintain it. Especially for a 50 year old. It's very rare for  anyone to look like they did 20 or more years ago like the pic of Michael coming out of the pool unless he's put the required effort into keeping that look for all these years.  I'm not agreeing or disagreeing as to whether Michael is on that gurney or not. I'm saying that over training (ie working out and dancing plus undereating most definitely produces the body you see on the gurney). Seen a number of my husbands clients who look like that when they have come to him for help.   It was also reported that Michael ate vegetarian and organic alot. I know he did eat meat sometimes (obviously the KFC is well known). People who mostly eat that way need more specialised diets to ensure adequate intake of correct nutrients to ensure muscle growth. Unless he supplemented his diet with protein sources, again his muscle mass would of been minimal.  My husband is also a natural bodybuilder and trains people this way too. I'm assuming if Michael was working out he more than likely would be the same. It's even more harder for a natural builder to gain and maintain than someone who uses steriods.

Like I said, not debating whether it is or isn't Michael.

[all4loveandbelieve]

Michael was training with Lou Ferigno, there is no way that is Michael's body, where are the muscles.. He is a dancer, I am sure he continue dancing even if he did not perform.. No muscle mass, nothing. Just a plain straight body.. That is not Michael's body..

Muscle mass requires an excess of calories. And alot at that. My husband and son weight train and have been doing so for a number of years.  I started only 2 years ago, mainly for strength and body composition. It takes alot of dedication and hard work.  According to those around him Michael wasn't eating much.  It's impossible to build any noticeable visual muscle mass on the body without the excess of calories and the lifting of heavy weights on a regular basis. It also takes alot more time than the few months Michael was reportedly working out with Lou for. These things combined with adequate rest between workouts to allow the muscles time to grow and repair themselves are required to build muscle mass. Doing only one without the other will not give you any results. Michael danced alot also for rehesearls and day to day which would of burnt up most of the calories he did consumed anyway, leaving nothing for new growth of the muscles.  Eating too little and dancing too much would produce a body similar to the one we see in the autopsy picture.

I know about body mass, my son is in body building competition, and I have been on a diet excersice I have lost 150 lbs. Protein is the key word. I know deep down Michael is eating well, Lou Ferigno said it himself. He was in great shape. I refuse to believe that, that is Michael's body in that gurney.  He  is still suppose to have some muscles at least like the picture he was coming out of the pool. This is not Michael.

My husband is a Lecturer but also a trainer too, so I understand what your saying. Muscle Mass is lost with age, unless you do the correct exercising and eating to maintain it. Especially for a 50 year old. It's very rare for  anyone to look like they did 20 or more years ago like the pic of Michael coming out of the pool unless he's put the required effort into keeping that look for all these years.  I'm not agreeing or disagreeing as to whether Michael is on that gurney or not. I'm saying that over training (ie working out and dancing plus undereating most definitely produces the body you see on the gurney). Seen a number of my husbands clients who look like that when they have come to him for help.   It was also reported that Michael ate vegetarian and organic alot. I know he did eat meat sometimes (obviously the KFC is well known). People who mostly eat that way need more specialised diets to ensure adequate intake of correct nutrients to ensure muscle growth. Unless he supplemented his diet with protein sources, again his muscle mass would of been minimal.  My husband is also a natural bodybuilder and trains people this way too. I'm assuming if Michael was working out he more than likely would be the same. It's even more harder for a natural builder to gain and maintain than someone who uses steriods.

Like I said, not debating whether it is or isn't Michael.

I agree with you, and I am not saying that Michael would have a body of a 20 yr old when he came out of the pool. Yes he is 53 and may not have all the muscle mass he should have but not that skinny as he is in that gurney.. I am sure he must have had some muscles at least six pack abs. I never saw Michael naked, so I cannot say for sure how he was. I guess it is wishful thinking.

[Suzy7]

 It does look like it could be Michael; he was always thin and given all of the layering of his clothes we dont know what he looked like underneath. However, it certainly looks altered if this is him, the proportions look incorrect.

 The stories regarding his diet ect. are technically apart of this hoax so perhaps we shouldn't take those too seriously . But I agree if it was a fact he didn't eat much and didn't do much to gain muscle he wouldn't have defintion; BUT that would contradict Jermaine who says he had abs?? Where are they?

[finfin]

Also contradicts what the O2 announcer said about MJ being ripped

You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-uA7ZEYp8tk [/youtube]

[all4loveandbelieve]

Also contradicts what the O2 announcer said about MJ being ripped

You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-uA7ZEYp8tk [/youtube]

That O2 announcement was really weird.. I know if I say this some people will jump on me, this was not the Michael I know for over 46 yrs.. I know he is shy, but the way he acted it was not Michael.. Since when Michael has loss for words? SInce when Michael walks up and down and looks back, since when Michael puts his arm up with a punch and puts it back down.. For me he was not Michael.. Unless this was all part for his hoax, making us think he was on drugs, so he was preparing us for his death.. This is the only solution I have found so far. The other solution would be that was not Michael but an impersonator.

[Suzy7]

@ finfin exactly yet another. I think his behaviour was due to many things, illusion and also he was laughing quite a bit. Probably due to what he was about to embark on lol.

[polarissucks01]

Dates wrong on autopsy photo 

[Delia]

There is another photo with the body on a stretcher and I red in an investigation site that they called the hospital and learned
that the stretcher (tipe named *Renaissance*) was not used any more and all of them were disposed of long time ago.
About the O2 announcement, I think that Michael was very cute, because... he was acting !
He laughed, he was preparing for something ... never seen before !

[finfin]

I just happened to google the words "Faker Graphic" and this image popped up - a front cover of a comic book called "Faker" from 2008 I thought it was very reminiscent of a certain autopsy photo OMG!  WTF??

Here is the Amazon site You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
and another site showing this book You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login