0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Quote from: "PureLove"For better view, I attached both of the pictures. You can see the smile, the chin, the teeth, the nose are the same with the TII Michael and 02 Michael. And I circled the second picture to show how the hands are the same. It's all Michael.Everybody is entitled to have their own opinion. Mine is that it wasn't Michael at the O2.I think the laugh from the top one is totally different. His laugh is wide and and his mouth is more closed.And the cleft in his chin is deeper.In the picture on the bottom Michael on the left has a much more rounder laugh and his mouth more open.I'm not so good in explaining, I hope you understand what I mean? It's only my opinion and of course I could be wrong but this is what I see. For me the real Michael is in the last pictures.
For better view, I attached both of the pictures. You can see the smile, the chin, the teeth, the nose are the same with the TII Michael and 02 Michael. And I circled the second picture to show how the hands are the same. It's all Michael.
Quote from: "PureLove"For better view, I attached both of the pictures. You can see the smile, the chin, the teeth, the nose are the same with the TII Michael and 02 Michael. And I circled the second picture to show how the hands are the same. It's all Michael.In my opinion they all look like MJ except for the actual announcement picture. It's like a different person came up on stage (a convincing double yet a double nevertheless). :|
I think the scar on the O2 guys face is a shadow from his hair.
Quote from: "MJhasSpoken"I think the scar on the O2 guys face is a shadow from his hair.Exactly what I was thinking...
I'm not arguing or trying to make you believe what I believe but it is just in front of your eyes and I can not believe how some can not recognize him
The biggest problem is, people call 02 Michael with horrible names
I'm not saying that you can't think or see your own but you need to accept that you have read so many double and twin stories that you started to think about the possibility of it
People do not need to agree about this issue but they should be respectful to him, even if they do not believe it was Michael himself.
@Purelove: Hi! Well, I haven´t read all the double stories yet, so I´m still quite "innocent" about that...Ok, the photos may tell their own story. But when I saw the O2 announcement, the person on stage looked and behaved so different from the Michael I knew, that it just jumped into my mind, that it´s probably not him. Of course he has the right to change his looks and his image, but sorry Michael and everyone <!-- s:oops: -->:oops:<!-- s:oops: --> , I don´t think it was the best choice if it really was him, which I still doubt.I just am not able to proove it yet.
People do not need to agree about this issue but they should be respectful to him, even if they do not believe it was Michael himself. I'm talking in general here. I hope I didn't offend you allforlove. You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
Why not, you can't deny Michael changed his looks many times, so is it that far fetched to have doubt if it is him?
I have never called him horrible names. In fact I think if it is Michael or a double he looks good, I just can't feel him, if you understand what I mean?
Now you are being prejudiced. You don't know what I think or believe, so to say I have been effected by these stories is wrong. I always make my own opinion about someone. If it effect me in any way it would be the opposite effect. I feel sorry if there are bad rumors told about a person,it gives me more reason to really know the truth by learning to know him or her.
Everybody is entitled to have their own opinion. Mine is that it wasn't Michael at the O2.
Where did you ever see me not being repectful to him? I agree people should be respectful, always,even if they don't treat you respectful. It makes us human and civilised and I don't want to be some kind of unsensible, heartless bitch.
People do not need to agree about this issue but they should be respectful to him, even if they do not believe it was Michael himself. I'm talking in general here. I hope I didn't offend you allforlove.[/b] You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login][/url]
You are right, somehow I missed the part of talking in general. These pictures you post are all Michael and yes on those he didn't change much.But you have to agree that during the Invicible period he did look different, maybe because of fillers or something I don't know.I saw the vids you posted and I have to admit they are pretty convincing.That's why I say it's only my opinion and of course I can be wrong.Maybe it was the lightning at the O2, I don't know anymore, I'm really confused now.. It's just that looking at him during the speech I never felt the warm feelings I usually get when I see him and I still think his laugh was way different. Maybe because he was so thin but he was also very thin at the Radio Music Award in 2003 and he didn't change there.But knowing Michael, whatever the case is, I'm convinced it was his intention to cause confusion about wether it's him or not.
And it was again himself at 02 when he was announcing his so called tour. That was the beginning of the hoax and I bet he was excited a lot.[/b]
Quote from: "PureLove" And it was again himself at 02 when he was announcing his so called tour. That was the beginning of the hoax and I bet he was excited a lot.[/b] So, when the so called tour was the beginning of the hoax, why not hoax the announcement as well?The photos may be convincing in a certain way, but I also agree to allforlove´s post, I also missed the warm feeling and the certain kind of mysterious energy I used to feel when I saw Michael speaking.And I have to repeat, I´m not a fan, I´m a supporter.There was something wrong, false energy, the manner strong, but not in a good way.And that was not only the hard lighting.