New blog: Challenging the non-believers arguments – part 1

[~Souza~]

Most people on this website and forum believe Michael Jackson is still alive, but there are also people visiting here that say he is dead. Some do so in a polite way, some in a less polite way, but they all have the same arguments as to why Michael Jackson could never have hoaxed his death. Because it is going in circles mostly on the forum about this, I decided to resuscitate the blog and post my view on these arguments. This is only part one, more will follow whenever I have time.

One of the opinions that is most expressed by non-believers, is that Michael would never do this to his kids. I strongly disagree with that statement, and I will try to explain in this piece why I disagree. People are welcome to challenge my view, if they can and they are also welcome to reply to this blog and share other arguments that make you believe Michael is really dead. This is my attempt to show the non-believers why we think what we think and that we are in no way disrespecting Michael. We heard your side of the story, some of us even were on your side, now try to see this from our point of view, before accusing us of being disrespectful to Michael.

Read more: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login

[jacilovesmichael]

I applaud you! Thank you for writing that. I look forward to reading more. Also couldn't agree more.

[MJonmind]

Great Souza!
An argument I get at work is, with all those people in on the hoax, somebody by now would have spilled the beans even for money; they would not have kept their mouths shut. I think that was mentioned yesterday by one of the guests as well.

[~Souza~]

Great Souza!
An argument I get at work is, with all those people in on the hoax, somebody by now would have spilled the beans even for money; they would not have kept their mouths shut. I think that was mentioned yesterday by one of the guests as well.

Yes, I saw that one too. I think I will move this one to the guest forum, so that they can reply if they want.

[Le Papillon Bleu]

Great Souza!
An argument I get at work is, with all those people in on the hoax, somebody by now would have spilled the beans even for money; they would not have kept their mouths shut. I think that was mentioned yesterday by one of the guests as well.

Yes, I saw that one too. I think I will move this one to the guest forum, so that they can reply if they want.

Wow .that would be great.

[Guest]

A little suggestion if i'm allowed. Since this debate between believers and non-believers has started off topic in "Do you think MJ uses this forum", i think we could insert a link at the end of that locked thread so they should know this debate is here now. And i salute Souza for this thread, hope we can all shake hands and have a nice talk where everyone explains their arguments in the most respectful and mature way.

[MissG]

*RTRL*

[fordtocarr]

Great idea Souza. Now us who don't want to read that Michael is dead can just avoid that topic And will you reopen the original thread about Michael visiting?  That was a good one.
 Thanks.

[MissG]

Great idea Souza. Now us who don't want to read that Michael is dead can just avoid that topic And will you reopen the original thread about Michael visiting?  That was a good one.
 Thanks.

Michael visiting? who? us?  

[maninthemoon]

Great idea Souza. Now us who don't want to read that Michael is dead can just avoid that topic And will you reopen the original thread about Michael visiting?  That was a good one.
 Thanks.

Indeed it was. Now that we've an official topic for arguing.

Why not open the other topic so we don't have to make a new one? (:

[Guest]

Me too,coz I took ages to find this thread.

[Guest]

The ambulance photo was fake because no one managed to get an up to date photo

[Guest]

The ambulance photo was fake because no one managed to get an up to date photo

The s at the end of pain was simply a mistake-after all it was probably done in a rush,as there would have been so many other things to do.

The numerology stuff is nonsense-no-one had THIS amount of time on their hands.

[Guest]

OK,I guess you don't like my name! I thought that's what all of us non believers were called.Troll.I want to be challenged,which is what thiss thread is all about.I'm not here to be nasty.Just to state my beliefs.

[eternalflame]

Hi 1guest, and everyone, it´s nice to have you here !

I think the "visiting" thread was locked for good reason, because there were lots of bad vibes there and we obviously couldn´t find a good way for discussion anymore, because some of the guests were very impolite and some of the members here got really scared.
Well, opening a new thread may not protect us from rude people, but it´s a good start, nevertheless.
I´m really looking forward to a good and polite discussion with all of you who are non - believers and want to share your reasons with us.
As I already posted, I´m on my way but not at the stage yet to say "I know he´s alive". At the moment I´m stuck and I need some fresh inputs from people with an opposite opinion.
So I´m looking forward to have some good and brain-refreshing discussion here.
Please stay polite. We are not nuts, and you are not stubborn. Every opinion is welcome.

Ok, to the subject: I can´t support the statement that Michael wouldn´t do that to his kids.
Kids are often more mature and intelligent as we might think, and Michael´s kids will be just the same. Kids can keep a secret quite well, if you explain it properly, they take it as a kind of sport
and mostly they are very proud to be involved.
And they want to protect their parents as well as the other way round, if necessary. And they weren´t at their baby stage anymore.
The kids don´t appear to me as if their little souls were seriously damaged.

Love & Peace!




-