Comparison..

  • 13 Replies
  • 1394 Views

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Thriller4ever

  • *
  • Registered users
  • Hoaxer
  • Army of L.O.V.E
  • Posts: 875
  • Hope is Immortal
    • Show only replies by Thriller4ever
    • blog

Comparison..

  • on: April 05, 2011, 07:24:54 AM
I know there is a topic called "is this the man same" but i joined these two pics myself and wanted to ask you guys whether it's the same....



I in my view...1st is michael and 2nd is impersonator....
because there's some difference at the chin...
what do u think??? :?:
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
twitter: @ComfortablyGeek

Offline GINAFELICIA

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 6506
  • Playing it safe is the riskiest choice.
    • Show only replies by GINAFELICIA

Re: Comparison..

  • on: April 05, 2011, 08:27:13 AM
I think none of them is Michael.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline GINAFELICIA

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 6506
  • Playing it safe is the riskiest choice.
    • Show only replies by GINAFELICIA

Re: Comparison..

  • on: April 05, 2011, 08:27:41 AM
Oh....hello guests  :mrgreen:
Now I'm going to another thread -  :arrow:  let's march there  :lol:
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline maninthemoon

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 339
    • Show only replies by maninthemoon

Re: Comparison..

  • on: April 05, 2011, 10:10:29 AM
I think both of them are the very same Michael Jackson. It's just the hair and lightning than changes it.

Also, the first picture is probably Photoshopped. He never were behind the curtain (in the official video).
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline GINAFELICIA

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 6506
  • Playing it safe is the riskiest choice.
    • Show only replies by GINAFELICIA

Re: Comparison..

  • on: April 05, 2011, 10:26:10 AM
OK...could be that both of them are Michael but his voice is quite unusual, his tone and everything about him is unusual at O2.
I think we should stop analysing the chin.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline all4loveandbelieve

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 4455
  • LIVE AND LET LIVE.
    • Show only replies by all4loveandbelieve

Re: Comparison..

  • on: April 05, 2011, 11:33:29 AM
Quote from: "GINAFELICIA"
OK...could be that both of them are Michael but his voice is quite unusual, his tone and everything about him is unusual at O2.
I think we should stop analysing the chin.


exactly we should start analysing the bottom lips. Michael had an unusual bottom lip it goes slanted to one side. Which other impersonators does not have. I always said it and will repeat it until I am blue on the face, the O2 dude is not Michael, his voice, mannerism and his hands it was not Michael.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »


I'm happy to be alive, I'm happy to be who I am.
Michael Jackson

Offline Thriller4ever

  • *
  • Registered users
  • Hoaxer
  • Army of L.O.V.E
  • Posts: 875
  • Hope is Immortal
    • Show only replies by Thriller4ever
    • blog

Re: Comparison..

  • on: April 05, 2011, 12:18:47 PM
I agree with that lips....but i'm not completely sure whether the guy at the o2 is michael....
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
twitter: @ComfortablyGeek

Offline GINAFELICIA

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 6506
  • Playing it safe is the riskiest choice.
    • Show only replies by GINAFELICIA

Re: Comparison..

  • on: April 05, 2011, 03:30:17 PM
It is hard to tell because with age Michael changed a lot and ...I don't know, I have to see TII again, but who's a double and who's Michael in TII  :? ?

But if you try to listen to his voice - The O2 Michael has not that SOFT voice we are used to. And the laughter is different.
The only moment when I can believe it is his voice is when he says "I love you so much, you have to know that". That moment makes me think it's Michael, but ONLY that moment.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline GINAFELICIA

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 6506
  • Playing it safe is the riskiest choice.
    • Show only replies by GINAFELICIA

Re: Comparison..

  • on: April 05, 2011, 03:53:06 PM
Ok, I think Dave Dave's voice at LK show resembles Michael's real voice more than the  O2 guy's voice.

But what if he changed his voice on purpose?

ok, this is the most frustrating part of the hoax for me - not knowing if it's MJ or not at  o2 arena.

Based on the guy's voice, I don't think it is Michael.
But I really would like to know WHO that guy is, because he can't be Michael.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Le Papillon Bleu

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 1209
    • Show only replies by Le Papillon Bleu

Re: Comparison..

  • on: April 05, 2011, 04:37:31 PM
Quote from: "GINAFELICIA"
Ok, I think Dave Dave's voice at LK show resembles Michael's real voice more than the  O2 guy's voice.

But what if he changed his voice on purpose?

ok, this is the most frustrating part of the hoax for me - not knowing if it's MJ or not at  o2 arena.

Based on the guy's voice, I don't think it is Michael.
But I really would like to know WHO that guy is, because he can't be Michael.
It's Michael trying to play Michael the man you never knew  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline AgentBJ

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 587
    • Show only replies by AgentBJ

Re: Comparison..

  • on: April 06, 2011, 10:55:49 AM
Quote from: "GINAFELICIA"
I think we should stop analysing the chin.

Oh...I love his chin! :)
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Pippi Longstocking

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 32
    • Show only replies by Pippi Longstocking

Re: Comparison..

  • on: April 07, 2011, 03:28:47 PM
Quote from: "GINAFELICIA"
O
ok, this is the most frustrating part of the hoax for me - not knowing if it's MJ or not at  o2 arena.

I totally agree with you. Though I don't think the man at O2 arena was Michael. Since MJ's physical appearance has changed several times in the past, it's pretty hard to say whether it was him or not on the picture but the voice on the video just doesn't sound like his... It seems like the attitude doesn't really match with MJ's personality, either. Of course I could be wrong but I'm pretty sure this man was just an impersonator.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Everything is okay in the end. If it's not okay, then it's not the end.

Offline GINAFELICIA

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 6506
  • Playing it safe is the riskiest choice.
    • Show only replies by GINAFELICIA

Re: Comparison..

  • on: April 07, 2011, 03:35:39 PM
Quote from: "Pippi Longstocking"
Quote from: "GINAFELICIA"
O
ok, this is the most frustrating part of the hoax for me - not knowing if it's MJ or not at  o2 arena.

I totally agree with you. Though I don't think the man at O2 arena was Michael. Since MJ's physical appearance has changed several times in the past, it's pretty hard to say whether it was him or not on the picture but the voice on the video just doesn't sound like his... It seems like the attitude doesn't really match with MJ's personality, either. Of course I could be wrong but I'm pretty sure this man was just an impersonator.

A very convincing one anyway.....
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline maninthemoon

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 339
    • Show only replies by maninthemoon

Re: Comparison..

  • on: April 09, 2011, 12:56:23 PM
Okay, if the O2 guy is someone else than Michael, then who? I have someone in my mind.. Barry J. Shaw. But I really need your opinion on it 'cause I am not sure as if this person really exists! He has a blogspot, but I can't see his Twitter or Facebook anywhere.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »