February 15, 2011: hearing?

  • 11 Replies
  • 1369 Views

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline bec

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Minion Reserve
  • Posts: 6387
    • Show only replies by bec
    • Exploring The Hoax

February 15, 2011: hearing?

  • on: February 12, 2011, 11:28:00 PM
Heard a rumor about a court hearing for Murray's case on the 15th. Can anyone confirm?
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Are you entertained?

Online Andrea

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 3787
    • Show only replies by Andrea

Re: 2/15/2011 hearing?

  • on: February 12, 2011, 11:35:48 PM
I remember something about a hearing at 1:30 on Feb 15th.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline paula-c

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 7597
    • Show only replies by paula-c
    • https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/378800000669499472/986af9e4566ce7ab11ef8703e3b19b04_normal.jpeg

Re: 2/15/2011 hearing?

  • on: February 14, 2011, 03:18:53 PM
Yes i also hear something of a hearing that day

Offline curls

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 3111
    • Show only replies by curls

Re: 2/15/2011 hearing?

  • on: February 14, 2011, 03:34:49 PM
bbb
New Member
New Member


Aantal berichten: 22
Registratiedatum: 2011-02-07

   
PostSubject: Re: Feb 7th - Murray pre-trial hearing   Mon Feb 07, 2011 11:42 pm   Reply with quote
Quote:
Mellie321

Judge ruled Conrad Murray case will be televised Evidentiary hearing Tuesday, 2/15 @ 1:30pm. Jury selection Thursday, 3/ 24 @ 9:30am

I don't know who Mellie321 is or where bbb got the quote from, but the above was posted on the temporary forum last week. (Sorry it hasn't copied over quite how I wanted it to!)
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline bec

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Minion Reserve
  • Posts: 6387
    • Show only replies by bec
    • Exploring The Hoax

Re: 2/15/2011 hearing?

  • on: February 14, 2011, 07:37:56 PM
Thanks for the verification. We will have to see what comes of it tomorrow.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Are you entertained?

Offline fordtocarr

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 1547
    • Show only replies by fordtocarr

Re: 2/15/2011 hearing?

  • on: February 15, 2011, 10:38:45 AM
LOS ANGELES – Defense attorneys and prosecutors are set to discuss, among other topics, plans for TV coverage of the trial of Michael Jackson's doctor, who faces a charge of involuntary manslaughter.

Dr. Conrad Murray has pleaded not guilty in the death of the music superstar on June 25, 2009. A hearing Tuesday will deal with coverage plans, jury questionnaire issues and discovery of evidence.

Attorneys are also scheduled to present names of proposed witnesses. The trial is expected to begin March 24 and last about six weeks.

An autopsy showed that Jackson died of an overdose of an anesthetic combined with other sedatives. Murray's lawyers say he did nothing that should have caused Jackson's death.

Prosecutors allege gross negligence in Murray's administering of the anesthetic, which is intended for use in hos
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline dragonflylilies

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 608
    • Show only replies by dragonflylilies

Re: 2/15/2011 hearing?

  • on: February 15, 2011, 02:29:06 PM
I really hope they televise it on a channel that I am able to view.  Just imagine all the things we may have missed that will be brought up in the trial.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline curls

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 3111
    • Show only replies by curls

Re: 2/15/2011 hearing?

  • on: February 16, 2011, 02:44:37 AM
"A hearing Tuesday will deal with coverage plans, jury questionnaire issues and discovery of evidence. Attorneys are also scheduled to present names of proposed witnesses."

 So, any news from yesterday's hearing?  Eerily silent, was it secret, did it actually happen??
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline trustno1

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 654
    • Show only replies by trustno1

Re: 2/15/2011 hearing?

  • on: February 16, 2011, 08:05:39 AM
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
In a world filled with despair, we must still dare to dream.  And in a world filled with distrust, we must still dare to believe.

Offline curls

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 3111
    • Show only replies by curls

Re: 2/15/2011 hearing?

  • on: February 16, 2011, 11:07:22 AM
Quote from: "trustno1"
http://http://www.radaronline.com/exclusives/2011/02/exclusive-judge-considering-conflict-interest-objection-dr-conrad-murrays-new

So there's to be another hearing on February 24th according to this.

Thanks for posting this link trustno1. So, I wonder if this conflict of interest thing will hold up proceedings. Is someone trying to buy some extra time?

Judge Michael Pastor has yet to approve Dr. Conrad Murray's new attorney, Nareg Gourjian to officially join the doctor's defense team as he gears up to fight manslaughter charges stemming from the 2009 death of his former patient, Michael Jackson.

As RadarOnline.com first reported, Jackson's former defense attorney, Mark Geragos has voiced concerns about Gourjian's appointment to Murray's defense team, citing a possible conflict of interest as Gourjian previously worked with Geragos, defending Michael Jackson against molestation charges.

In court Tuesday, Judge Michael E Pastor requested that Geragos attend the next pre-trial hearing on February 24 for "a fact specific determination" to ascertain if there is a conflict of interest with Gourjian repping Murray.

Judge Pastor also invited Michael Jackson Estate powerhouse lawyer, Howard Weitzman to give the estate a chance to respond also.

Gourijian was an associate of Geragos' law firm and worked on Jackson's successful defense during the late singer's infamous 2005 trial, where he stood accused of seven counts of child molestation and two counts of administering an intoxicating agent to a 13-year-old male.

As RadarOnline.com previously reported, Gregaros is concerned that a former member of his team, who was privy to the King of Pop's personal information, is now working to defend the man accused of killing him.

"Mark is concerned about the conflict of interest because Nareg worked on Michael's molestation defense," a source told RadarOnline.com.

"Nareg was privy to details about Michael Jackson's life that were never made public.

"This is very, very bothersome to Geragos."

In the brief pre-trial hearing, it was also revealed that there are 91 defense witnesses, and 107 witnesses for the prosecution.

Dr Murray is accused of causing the pop icon's death on June 25, 2009 by administering an overdose of the powerful sedative Propofol, with which Jackson was being treated to help him sleep.

The trial is set to start March 24.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

MJhasSpoken

  • *
  • Guest
    • Show only replies by MJhasSpoken

Re: 2/15/2011 hearing?

  • on: February 17, 2011, 01:35:19 AM
What courthouse is the pretrial in?
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline 2good2btrue

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • FORGIVENESS IS THE KEY TO YOUR HAPPINESS
  • Posts: 4210
    • Show only replies by 2good2btrue

Re: 2/15/2011 hearing?

  • on: February 17, 2011, 02:34:20 AM
Judge questions Conrad Murray's hiring of lawyer who once worked for Michael Jackson defense team        
Wednesday, 16 February 2011 21:10


The judge handling the trial of Michael Jackson’s physician expressed concern Tuesday that the doctor recently hired a lawyer who once worked for a firm that defended the pop star from child molestation charges.

[Updated at 3:19 p.m.: Dr. Conrad Murray added attorney Nareg Gourjian to his defense team for the involuntary manslaughter trial set to begin next month. Gourjian formerly worked for Mark Geragos, who was Jackson’s attorney about seven years ago in the runup to a molestation trial in Santa Maria.]

Los Angeles Superior Court Judge Michael Pastor said at a hearing Tuesday that he was worried about a possible conflict of interest and would seek input from Jackson’s estate before ruling.

Gourjian said  he was a junior associate who had “minimal” involvement in the Jackson defense and said, “There is no conflict.” The singer changed lawyers before trial.

The defense gave the prosecution a list of more than 90 potential witnesses. The prosecution has already turned over a list of more than 100 names.

Murray could face four years in prison if convicted.


http://www.mjjcommunity.com/site/index. ... &Itemid=77
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »