0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

*

AGATopic starter

O2 Guy and MJ - differences
January 20, 2011, 04:23:55 AM
Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest
friendly
0
funny
0
informative
0
agree
0
disagree
0
pwnt
0
like
0
dislike
0
late
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

*

MJonmind

Re: O2 Guy and MJ - differences
January 20, 2011, 04:46:09 AM
They are one and the same. Age, make-up, lighting, angles, acting. I'm 100% sure.
Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest
friendly
0
funny
0
informative
0
agree
0
disagree
0
pwnt
0
like
0
dislike
0
late
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

*

~Souza~

Re: O2 Guy and MJ - differences
January 20, 2011, 05:19:35 AM
I think the O2 dude on top (with Tohme in the bus) is Mike himself IMO. There were 2 different MJ's there, this one seems to be the real deal. The one on stage at the other hand is someone else.
Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest
friendly
0
funny
0
informative
0
agree
0
disagree
0
pwnt
0
like
0
dislike
0
late
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

*

MissG

Re: O2 Guy and MJ - differences
January 20, 2011, 05:33:13 AM
with the surgeries, make up, implants,....who knows any longer? :x I can´t even define the skull any more  :x
Michael is the guy on the right.
The O2 guy on those pics looks shopped. But his pinky finger looks as Michaels.

Back to point 0  :evil:
Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest
friendly
0
funny
0
informative
0
agree
0
disagree
0
pwnt
0
like
0
dislike
0
late
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
("Minkin güerveeeee")
Michael pls come back


"Why a four-year-old child could understand this hoax. Run out and find me a four-year-old child. I can't make head nor tail out of it"

*

Datroot

Re: O2 Guy and MJ - differences
January 20, 2011, 05:34:43 AM
The one on the left looks like he could be a double because of the differences in the features (which to me are startling).
Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest
friendly
0
funny
0
informative
0
agree
0
disagree
0
pwnt
0
like
0
dislike
0
late
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions


I'M A LOVER, NOT A FIGHTER

Re: O2 Guy and MJ - differences
January 20, 2011, 06:02:59 AM
Just to point out,Michael was in London for the 02 conference,he just never went on the stage.
He was pictured by the media arriving at the airport,at the hotel, leaving the hotel,arriving back at the hotel,going to a show..but what happened in between is not Michael.
I think that is exactly what he was there for...to be seen so no one questioned it...and to oversee the start of his production obviously  ;)
Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest
friendly
0
funny
0
informative
0
agree
0
disagree
0
pwnt
0
like
0
dislike
0
late
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

*

~Souza~

Re: O2 Guy and MJ - differences
January 20, 2011, 06:10:05 AM
Quote from: "Sinderella"
Just to point out,Michael was in London for the 02 conference,he just never went on the stage.
He was pictured by the media arriving at the airport,at the hotel, leaving the hotel,arriving back at the hotel,going to a show..but what happened in between is not Michael.
I think that is exactly what he was there for...to be seen so no one questioned it...and to oversee the start of his production obviously  ;)
True, because there are pictures of the real deal too. That made me sure O2 dude is not Mike, because he looks NOTHING like the one photographed just a day later. Behaviour can be faked, voice can be altered, but your smile doesn't change overnight. The weird, sharp smile is the main thing that gave O2 dude away. Plus the fact that his upper body is too long and his legs too short, plus all the other stuff I won't bring up anymore :lol:
Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest
friendly
0
funny
0
informative
0
agree
0
disagree
0
pwnt
0
like
0
dislike
0
late
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Re: O2 Guy and MJ - differences
January 20, 2011, 06:17:27 AM
Quote from: "~Souza~"
Quote from: "Sinderella"
Just to point out,Michael was in London for the 02 conference,he just never went on the stage.
He was pictured by the media arriving at the airport,at the hotel, leaving the hotel,arriving back at the hotel,going to a show..but what happened in between is not Michael.
I think that is exactly what he was there for...to be seen so no one questioned it...and to oversee the start of his production obviously  ;)
True, because there are pictures of the real deal too. That made me sure O2 dude is not Mike, because he looks NOTHING like the one photographed just a day later. Behaviour can be faked, voice can be altered, but your smile doesn't change overnight. The weird, sharp smile is the main thing that gave O2 dude away. Plus the fact that his upper body is too long and his legs too short, plus all the other stuff I won't bring up anymore :lol:

agreed 100%, poor guy, he tried so hard  :lol:
Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest
friendly
0
funny
0
informative
0
agree
0
disagree
0
pwnt
0
like
0
dislike
0
late
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Re: O2 Guy and MJ - differences
January 20, 2011, 06:37:08 AM
He really made those three words his own work


*Walks on stage*

THIS               IS              IT

THIS IS IT

THIS

IS

IT

THIS IS IT!


*walks off stage*
Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest
friendly
0
funny
0
informative
0
agree
0
disagree
0
pwnt
0
like
0
dislike
0
late
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

*

2good2btrue

  • Hoaxer
  • View Profile
  • FORGIVENESS IS THE KEY TO YOUR HAPPINESS
  • 4210
Re: O2 Guy and MJ - differences
January 20, 2011, 07:02:11 AM
I totally agree that there is definitely 2 different MJ's that day... How can you not notice such a drastic difference like this.

His smile is sooooooo much longer and more pronounced.  Even the noses are completely different, and the skin is totally the wrong colour without a doubt.  Even the lighting wouldnt and couldn't change that.  It wasn't unusual for MJ to use decoys.

This was one of his first official appearances since the accusations of 2005.  He may of been afraid of something going wrong, and decided to use the double for the announcement onlt for safety reasons.  Did you notice there were no bodyguards standing next to him???   Did they check everyone in the audience for weapons  beforehand?????  Probably not, and if MJ feared for his life, he may have had no other choice but to have a stand in........this is of course just my honest opinion, but I wasn't an obsessed fan, and I don't believe he wanted to deceive his fans, but more than likely, needed to play it safe.
Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest
friendly
0
funny
0
informative
0
agree
0
disagree
0
pwnt
0
like
0
dislike
0
late
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

*

curls

Re: O2 Guy and MJ - differences
January 20, 2011, 07:05:44 AM
Quote from: "2good2btrue"
I totally agree that there is definitely 2 different MJ's that day... How can you not notice such a drastic difference like this.

His smile is sooooooo much longer and more pronounced.  Even the noses are completely different, and the skin is totally the wrong colour without a doubt.  Even the lighting wouldnt and couldn't change that.  It wasn't unusual for MJ to use decoys.

This was one of his first official appearances since the accusations of 2005.  He may of been afraid of something going wrong, and decided to use the double for the announcement onlt for safety reasons.  Did you notice there were no bodyguards standing next to him???   Did they check everyone in the audience for weapons  beforehand????? Probably not, and if MJ feared for his life, he may have had no other choice but to have a stand in........this is of course just my honest opinion, but I wasn't an obsessed fan, and I don't believe he wanted to deceive his fans, but more than likely, needed to play it safe.

Sorry, but I can't believe that if MJ feared for his life, he'd put a stand-in to take the bullets or whatever for him.
Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest
friendly
0
funny
0
informative
0
agree
0
disagree
0
pwnt
0
like
0
dislike
0
late
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

*

MissG

Re: O2 Guy and MJ - differences
January 20, 2011, 07:19:09 AM
Please, check from 0:55
Michael falls down or hides or he has been injured. Tohmé also bends down to assist Michael.
[youtube:6h2nht61]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LdzCd_Pc17Y&feature=related[/youtube:6h2nht61]
Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest
friendly
0
funny
0
informative
0
agree
0
disagree
0
pwnt
0
like
0
dislike
0
late
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
("Minkin güerveeeee")
Michael pls come back


"Why a four-year-old child could understand this hoax. Run out and find me a four-year-old child. I can't make head nor tail out of it"

*

paula-c

Re: O2 Guy and MJ - differences
January 20, 2011, 09:50:30 AM
I believe that the man of O2 is not Michael, gestures, gait overacted, not that this double will behave this way
Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest
friendly
0
funny
0
informative
0
agree
0
disagree
0
pwnt
0
like
0
dislike
0
late
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login

Re: O2 Guy and MJ - differences
January 20, 2011, 10:06:22 AM
At the O2 is definitely not Michael.I agree with so many explanations from all of you.That guy looks weird, his walk,  he's speech  is just  wrong, really.Keep saying This is it over and over again like there was nothing more to say.
Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest
friendly
0
funny
0
informative
0
agree
0
disagree
0
pwnt
0
like
0
dislike
0
late
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
I'll be forever searching for your love .I love you Michael

*

MissG

Re: O2 Guy and MJ - differences
January 20, 2011, 11:20:05 AM
What if he got bored of being mobbed all the time by screaming fans? This is it. Well, yes!
Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest
friendly
0
funny
0
informative
0
agree
0
disagree
0
pwnt
0
like
0
dislike
0
late
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
("Minkin güerveeeee")
Michael pls come back


"Why a four-year-old child could understand this hoax. Run out and find me a four-year-old child. I can't make head nor tail out of it"

 

SimplePortal 2.3.6 © 2008-2014, SimplePortal