TIAI December 14

[MJhasSpoken]

So 2  court cases in Jan this one and the CM case

[onemoretime]

And I wonder who is "THE SURVIVING HEIR OF VERNON E PRESLEY"? Is it Elvis himself, because Lisa is another defendant as well as the "unknown heirs". So how many are there?  :?
I am glad to hear from TS again after all the turmoil lately. Not chased off the board, as feared, but still monitoring the events. Life's a stage, really. So much happening at the moment. Not only bad news.

[suspicious mind]

"]And I wonder who is "THE SURVIVING HEIR OF VERNON E PRESLEY"? Is it Elvis himself, because Lisa is another defendant as well as the "unknown heirs". So how many are there?  :? [/size]I am glad to hear from TS again after all the turmoil lately. Not chased off the board, as feared, but still monitoring the events. Life's a stage, really. So much happening at the moment. Not only bad news.

i wondered about that too. thought i didn't even know enough about all of this to pose the question . :oops:

[Im_convincedmjalive]

I was expecting this redirect. I thought it would be today not yesterday, lol.
 I am a little late.  If I say this in layman terms so far:

Eliza filed a complaint to determine paternity and heirship in 2009.  
14-AUG-2009 Original complaint    
COMPLAINT TO DETERMINE PARENTAGE AND HEIRSHIP

Then there was a publication made to unknown heirs of Vernon, which means that the unknown heirs were informed publically that Eliza was wanting to determine paternity and heirship. :?: like when a person dies and the person in charge of the Estate puts in the newspaper an announcement that the person died so if any creditors want a peice of the estate they better do it in a timely manner or forget ever getting any money later on when the amount of time required for public notice is over.

17-AUG-2009 Publication order  
ON THE UNKNOWN HEIRS OF VERNON E PRESLEY PUBLICATION DATES: AUGUST 21, 28, SEPTEMBER 4, AND 11, 2009 RETURN DATE: OCTOBER 12, 2009

Then there was proof of that publication.
11-SEP-2009 Proof of publication  
 ON THE UNKNOWN HEIRS OF VERNON E. PRESLEY

Nothing happened between Sep. 11 2009 and August 6 2010 in her case so her (Eliza's) lawyer filed for a default judgement on 06-AUG-2010.
OF APPLICATION MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT

This is so another lawyer for Eliza can stand in.
10-AUG-2010
CONSENT ORDER SUBSTITUTING COUNSEL

On August 16 2010 Lisa's lawyer filed an answer to the complaint. He also asked for a summary judgement, which means that the lawyer wanted the judge to rule in LMP's favor based on: ITEMIZATION OF UNDISPUTED FACTS.

20-AUG-2010 LETTER FROM KIM GARRETT  (Whoever that is?)  :?

Then on 08-OCT-2010 Eliza's lawyer CALDWELL, KATHLEEN L filed a
 MOTION FOR STAY ON MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT TO ALLOW DISCOVERY RELEVANT TO SAID MOTION

Basically that means Eliza's lawyer asked for time to discover relevant info on LMP's motion for a summary judgement.

On 27-OCT-2010 The first scheduling conference was set for November 30 2010
Notice sent/set for trial      
SET FOR SCHEDULING CONFERENCE NOVEMBER 30, 2010 @ 1:30.

This had to be reset to December 14 2010.
10-NOV-2010 Case continued certain
SCHEDULING CONFERENCE RESET FOR DECEMBER 14, 2010 @ 1:30 P.M.

Then on 14-DEC-2010 a Motion Set for jan 14, 2011@11:00 A.M.
MOTION FOR SUMMARY
 
So now it is a waiting game until January 14 2011. This means that the Chancellor accepted Eliza's DNA the way it is. If the Chancellor wouldn't have accepted the DNA the way it is he would have ruled in favor of LMP on August 16 2010.

Hmm that is what I call freaky timing for the request of a Summary Judgement by LMP's lawyer...

Peace

[GodhaschosenMJ]

So now it is a waiting game until January 14 2011. This means that the Chancellor accepted Eliza's DNA the way it is. If the Chancellor wouldn't have accepted the DNA the way it is he would have ruled in favor of LMP on August 16 2010.  This is very interesting statement.  

Hmm that is what I call freaky timing for the request of a Summary Judgement by LMP's lawyer...  Could you elaborate alittle more on this comment?! [/b]

Peace[/quote]

[GodhaschosenMJ]

So now it is a waiting game until January 14 2011. This means that the Chancellor accepted Eliza's DNA the way it is. If the Chancellor wouldn't have accepted the DNA the way it is he would have ruled in favor of LMP on August 16 2010.  This is very interesting statement.  

Hmm that is what I call freaky timing for the request of a Summary Judgement by LMP's lawyer...  Could you elaborate alittle more on this comment?! [/b]

Peace[/quote]

[Im_convincedmjalive]

So now it is a waiting game until January 14 2011. This means that the Chancellor accepted Eliza's DNA the way it is. If the Chancellor wouldn't have accepted the DNA the way it is he would have ruled in favor of LMP on August 16 2010.  

This is very interesting statement.  

Hmm that is what I call freaky timing for the request of a Summary Judgement by LMP's lawyer...  

Could you elaborate alittle more on this comment?!

From my first post:
On August 16 2010 Lisa's lawyer filed an answer to the complaint. He also asked for a summary judgement, which means that the lawyer wanted the judge to rule in LMP's favor based on: ITEMIZATION OF UNDISPUTED FACTS.

The date the lawyer for LMP filed an answer was on the anniversary of Elvis' "death".

Peace

[GodhaschosenMJ]

Thanks I'mConvinced, I was having some really frustrating computer problems and thats why my posts came out weird and twice too!! Sorry it didn't come out right!  :oops:  :lol: