0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Good questions.And interesting that suddenly we have Linda appearing to say that Eliza is doing this against the wishes of Jesse.Plausible.Regarding the court date of 12-14, I feel, if memory serves, that this was delayed from the original date of 11/30, and recently too...Do we have proof that the album release date was set (or determined) AFTER this most recent delay, to coincide withe court date?Because Eliza's case IS real... it can't be scheduled at will. The album can of course.So until I see proof that the album date was announced AFTER the most recent delay in Eliza's case... this will have to be considered a legitimate coincidence.
Quote from: "bec"Good questions.And interesting that suddenly we have Linda appearing to say that Eliza is doing this against the wishes of Jesse.Plausible.Regarding the court date of 12-14, I feel, if memory serves, that this was delayed from the original date of 11/30, and recently too...Do we have proof that the album release date was set (or determined) AFTER this most recent delay, to coincide withe court date?Because Eliza's case IS real... it can't be scheduled at will. The album can of course.So until I see proof that the album date was announced AFTER the most recent delay in Eliza's case... this will have to be considered a legitimate coincidence.I know that Eliza said on twitter on 11th of November that the date has been postponed to 14th of December. We knew that the album will be released on 14th at that time.So this is pure coincidence.We knew about the release date on 5th of NovemberYou are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
Quote from: "_Anna_"Quote from: "bec"Good questions.And interesting that suddenly we have Linda appearing to say that Eliza is doing this against the wishes of Jesse.Plausible.Regarding the court date of 12-14, I feel, if memory serves, that this was delayed from the original date of 11/30, and recently too...Do we have proof that the album release date was set (or determined) AFTER this most recent delay, to coincide withe court date?Because Eliza's case IS real... it can't be scheduled at will. The album can of course.So until I see proof that the album date was announced AFTER the most recent delay in Eliza's case... this will have to be considered a legitimate coincidence.I know that Eliza said on twitter on 11th of November that the date has been postponed to 14th of December. We knew that the album will be released on 14th at that time.So this is pure coincidence.We knew about the release date on 5th of NovemberYou are not allowed to view links. Register or LoginNot until it's proven.Just because Eliza twittered something doesn't mean that she hadn't know about it already for days...Memory doesn't always serve and I don't have something in print handy to prove the album release date was set on 11/5 either.I'd like to see when, exactly, the case was delayed and when exactly the album release date was announced.
- The reference to a "him" who knows: "As he spoke to me years ago about another situation relating to him being alive "Oh well...no body would believe him anyway." And NO, he was not referring to Dr. Hinton." Could this be a reference to Michael?
I do have some very important information. I am not going to say right now how I got this information; many would not believe me if I told you. You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
Quote from: "bec"Quote from: "_Anna_"Quote from: "bec"Good questions.And interesting that suddenly we have Linda appearing to say that Eliza is doing this against the wishes of Jesse.Plausible.Regarding the court date of 12-14, I feel, if memory serves, that this was delayed from the original date of 11/30, and recently too...Do we have proof that the album release date was set (or determined) AFTER this most recent delay, to coincide withe court date?Because Eliza's case IS real... it can't be scheduled at will. The album can of course.So until I see proof that the album date was announced AFTER the most recent delay in Eliza's case... this will have to be considered a legitimate coincidence.I know that Eliza said on twitter on 11th of November that the date has been postponed to 14th of December. We knew that the album will be released on 14th at that time.So this is pure coincidence.We knew about the release date on 5th of NovemberYou are not allowed to view links. Register or LoginNot until it's proven.Just because Eliza twittered something doesn't mean that she hadn't know about it already for days...Memory doesn't always serve and I don't have something in print handy to prove the album release date was set on 11/5 either.I'd like to see when, exactly, the case was delayed and when exactly the album release date was announced.As far as I can see, the court hearing was officially rescheduled on the 10th November ---> see court register below, last line:You are not allowed to view links. Register or LoginI can accept the occasional coincidence but we are getting far too many of those! Money,connections and knowledge of the court system can probably get you a reasonable chance to get the date you want... or God is directing the Hoax! With L.O.V.E
I don't believe in a god... not even a little bit... so I have to keep looking for another plausible explanation.To put it bluntly, in my opinion, to attribute it to "god" is to ignore it and walk away. That's like giving up. "Well, I don't know and I don't understand, so it's an act of 'god" and I no longer have to think about it." It's sort of like calling something a coincidence... what did back say? "Coincidence is a lazy place-holder for reasoning", something like that.