0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

*

~Souza~

Re: This is DEFINITELY not Mike.
August 04, 2010, 05:14:04 PM
Quote from: "larab"
Klein was reconstructing Michael's face..sometimes he even wore band aids on his nose. I still think it is him.

Reconstruct what? I think he looked fine back in 2005, I don't see what should be reconstructed, but maybe that's just me... :?



Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest
friendly
0
funny
0
informative
0
agree
0
disagree
0
pwnt
0
like
0
dislike
0
late
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Re: This is DEFINITELY not Mike.
August 04, 2010, 05:21:17 PM
OMG OMG OMG...TII guy in these pics look JUST LIKE MIKE KISS!!!!! i still wasn't sure anout the dounle theory, but OMG...this really convinced me
Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest
friendly
0
funny
0
informative
0
agree
0
disagree
0
pwnt
0
like
0
dislike
0
late
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
WHEN I SAY I LOVE YOU, MICHAEL YOU GOTTA KNOW THAT IT'S FOR ALL TIME

Re: This is DEFINITELY not Mike.
August 04, 2010, 08:50:43 PM
Quote from: "wandulka"
Sorry, if it's been posted before..
Till now I was convinced there were no doubles  in TII..I'm not that convinced now..I've seen TII about 5 times, but I haven't seen anyone else besides Michael in the movie..so, I went trough some photos and found this one..Do you guys think it's possible that this guy worked as a stand-in and not as a "double?" It's deff not Michael.

You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login

Zoomed in & lightened:


I believe this is Christopher Gaspar.
Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest
friendly
0
funny
0
informative
0
agree
0
disagree
0
pwnt
0
like
0
dislike
0
late
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Re: This is DEFINITELY not Mike.
August 04, 2010, 08:58:47 PM
Quote from: "callofthewild"
Quote from: "airieslady"
Quote from: "callofthewild"
Quote from: "mjboogie"
OMG! No wonder I knew it! Because when I was watching the movie (and I have saw it 3 times) there was something off with the MJ in Orange Pants. It just did not look like MJ! That is not MJ. And now more than ever it is just very very obvious that MJ is alive! I really don't believe MJ died a long time ago like some people are claiming. I want to believe that they did use doubles in this movie because maybe MJ was really attending to other things? I wish there was a way we could find out exactly when the rehearsels were done? Because now that we have discovered doubles (just as Joe Jackson stated!) makes me wonder exactly when the rehearsels were done! Everything is off also......or was MJ sick and sometimes could not attend? WHen "They don't really care about us was performed" it was really MJ. Also.... when Smooth Criminal was performed (it was a stunt man that jumped out of the window, (now that one was real obvious! ;) ) Guys..... I really really really believe that we should research why doubles were used! The reasons would definitley give us more insight into the hoax. And you all were right some of those dance moves (if you are a longtime MJ fan) just wasn't our MJ! Just wasn't!

Sorry, but it's definitely Mike in the orange pants.


Would you have some proof of this?  Where you there?  hmmm!

You can choose to believe it's him, or not. It's your prerogative. I simply believe it because I'm in a position to know it to be the truth.

Ok - I believe. And I owe Michael a huge apology for not thinking it was him... :oops:
Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest
friendly
0
funny
0
informative
0
agree
0
disagree
0
pwnt
0
like
0
dislike
0
late
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
I'm proud to be a child of God and a member of MJ's Army of L.O.V.E.
 
"Press coverage of my life is like [watching] a fictitious movie...like watching science fiction. It's not true." ~Michael Jackson (2005)

"You should not believe everything you read. You are missing the most important revelations". Craig Harvey 3-15-2012

mykidsmum

  • Guest
Re: This is DEFINITELY not Mike.
August 04, 2010, 09:02:29 PM
Quote from: "Miss.Peppers"
In an interview with TMZ, Dr Klein said that was his jacket that MJ was wearing that day with the orange trousers
not that coat, it's the big "winter" coat he's wearing...I don't think that shiny coat would fit Kleins little finger....LOL
Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest
friendly
0
funny
0
informative
0
agree
0
disagree
0
pwnt
0
like
0
dislike
0
late
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Guest

  • Guest
Re: This is DEFINITELY not Mike.
August 04, 2010, 09:16:42 PM
Quote from: "mykidsmum"
Quote from: "Miss.Peppers"
In an interview with TMZ, Dr Klein said that was his jacket that MJ was wearing that day with the orange trousers
not that coat, it's the big "winter" coat he's wearing...I don't think that shiny coat would fit Kleins little finger....LOL

That flight jacket wouldn't fit Klein either. He's as big as his mouth is.
Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest
friendly
0
funny
0
informative
0
agree
0
disagree
0
pwnt
0
like
0
dislike
0
late
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Re: This is DEFINITELY not Mike.
August 04, 2010, 09:19:16 PM
Just looked at the pics of Michael Kiss - have to agree thats a good likeness and I have never felt that 'orange pants' was Michael, actually, the only Michael I felt that was in TII for definate was the person in the grey suit.
Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest
friendly
0
funny
0
informative
0
agree
0
disagree
0
pwnt
0
like
0
dislike
0
late
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

*

Sangre

Re: This is DEFINITELY not Mike.
August 05, 2010, 02:53:21 AM
It doesn't look like Michael, but I don't understand why would they use doubles in TII if MJ wanted to make a movie? It makes me think he might be gone and they didn't get enough footage (opposite to what KO claimed o.O) and had to think of something really fast.

Or if they did plan to use doubles, because 50 concerts would have been too much (I don't remember where I read it, but it was said that Michael would perform only a few songs and then get some rest while impersonators sing and dance etc), but that makes me think TII shows were actually about to take place. But that's impossible if MJ had planned a hoax awhile ago, but that hoax couldn't have been a rush decision.

Gah, I don't know...
Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest
friendly
0
funny
0
informative
0
agree
0
disagree
0
pwnt
0
like
0
dislike
0
late
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
"No one should judge what I\'ve done with my life. Not unless they\'ve been in my shoes every horrible day and every sleepless night." ~ Michael J. (1995)

*

Datroot

Re: This is DEFINITELY not Mike.
August 05, 2010, 03:09:55 AM
MJ may have had to 'leave' earlier than planned so they had to use a 'stand-in' or 'double' (whatever you want to call it) to complete the film.  Just my humble O.
Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest
friendly
0
funny
0
informative
0
agree
0
disagree
0
pwnt
0
like
0
dislike
0
late
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions


I'M A LOVER, NOT A FIGHTER

*

Kirsche

Re: This is DEFINITELY not Mike.
August 11, 2010, 03:01:52 PM
Quote from: "larab"
Klein was reconstructing Michael's face..sometimes he even wore band aids on his nose. I still think it is him.


oh he did? In the movie?? never noticed that? Do you think that's the reason why he looked so different?  Because he looks very strange in that pictures, like it is not him...
Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest
friendly
0
funny
0
informative
0
agree
0
disagree
0
pwnt
0
like
0
dislike
0
late
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
[
OKAY, EVERBODY! THAT\'S A WRAP!

*

Glinda

Re: This is DEFINITELY not Mike.
August 11, 2010, 03:50:43 PM
Michael Jackson: (Discussing a problem with his ear piece) It's like someone's shoving their fist in my ear!

Kenny: You have the earpiece from the other..eh..you know.. :oops:

 :mrgreen:  :mrgreen:
Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest
friendly
0
funny
0
informative
0
agree
0
disagree
0
pwnt
0
like
0
dislike
0
late
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

*

nefari

Re: This is DEFINITELY not Mike.
August 11, 2010, 05:07:59 PM
There were certain parts of TII where I was like ok why are we seeing no moonwalks. I think I know why! Because the double or whoever that was standing in for Mike could NOT do a moonwalk. :lol:
And flubbing it up would have been a dead give away.
Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest
friendly
0
funny
0
informative
0
agree
0
disagree
0
pwnt
0
like
0
dislike
0
late
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
]

Re: This is DEFINITELY not Mike.
August 12, 2010, 06:55:46 AM
This is certainly not Michael! I have seen TII many times and there are some parts in which MJ looks...odd! I'm open to every theory about Mike, so...this might be a double! Joe Jackson also mentioned that only doubles were used for the movie.But who knows if that guys words are to be trusted? :roll:
Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest
friendly
0
funny
0
informative
0
agree
0
disagree
0
pwnt
0
like
0
dislike
0
late
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

*

Glinda

Re: This is DEFINITELY not Mike.
August 12, 2010, 07:57:35 AM
Quote from: "lacta89"
This is certainly not Michael! I have seen TII many times and there are some parts in which MJ looks...odd! I'm open to every theory about Mike, so...this might be a double! Joe Jackson also mentioned that only doubles were used for the movie.But who knows if that guys words are to be trusted? :roll:

Joe Jackson insists “This is It” is mostly body doubles and “the media is going to tear this movie apart.”

from tmz.
Joe knows the diffrence :mrgreen:

Would be very bad if he doesnt know.
Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest
friendly
0
funny
0
informative
0
agree
0
disagree
0
pwnt
0
like
0
dislike
0
late
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

 

Related Topics

  Subject / Started by Replies Last post
7 Replies
1904 Views
Last post February 07, 2010, 03:17:56 AM
by gracesong
115 Replies
10310 Views
Last post February 06, 2010, 03:13:39 PM
by paula-c
67 Replies
6012 Views
Last post February 22, 2010, 03:08:57 PM
by Eva R
28 Replies
2738 Views
Last post March 11, 2010, 11:13:53 AM
by Kirsche
mike's shameful employees

Started by the arabian nights Others

8 Replies
1917 Views
Last post April 10, 2010, 03:57:34 PM
by the arabian nights

SimplePortal 2.3.6 © 2008-2014, SimplePortal