0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Quote from: "DancingTheDream"The fact that the tomb is yet to be engraved is a great puzzle to me.I know the actual tomb is very large and that it fits 9 coffins. (creepy!) - so it stands to reason this would be a "family" tomb... yet it hasnt even been engraved with the name "Jackson" or anything!I just posted in another thread that I've seen his tomb on Feb. 14th 2011 and didn't see any engraving on it. There are engravings on other tombs there. There are a few mausoleums at Forrest Lawn and they all have similar looking tombs. They engrave the names on them, but leave room for more names, if necessary. If he IS there, I find it extremely disrespectful, that his tomb is not engraved.
The fact that the tomb is yet to be engraved is a great puzzle to me.I know the actual tomb is very large and that it fits 9 coffins. (creepy!) - so it stands to reason this would be a "family" tomb... yet it hasnt even been engraved with the name "Jackson" or anything!
This is considered to be another HUGE clue (to me). Knowing this family and how grandios they do things (the tomb, his memorial/funeral, supposed attire, etc), I refuse to believe that he'd be in an unmarked grave for soooooo long. It's not as if the world doesn't know where he's "buried"--nor is it accessible. Usually when graves are unmarked, money is a factor. Is it a temporary resting place? What's the big deal? He isn't in it, that's why!!!