Why the stains?

  • 33 Replies
  • 4285 Views

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Lorrie

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 232
    • Show only replies by Lorrie

Re: Why the stains?

  • on: December 14, 2009, 04:23:51 PM
Rushka Bergman is a wardrobe stylist; Karen Faye is a makeup artist and hairstylist. The two women specialize in completely different things, and they were probably hired or let go for different, possibly unrelated reasons.

As for the "stains," they just show that Michael is a normal human being who gets stuff on his clothes sometimes because he's not perfect and not focused on insignificant things like that all of the time. He's a busy man and has better things to worry about than a smudge here and a little dust there when he's going about his normal everyday business.

It's easy to see why he didn't want to be photographed and hated interacting with the media. How distressing it must have been to know that no matter how much effort he put into looking presentable and acting decently, people would analyze the heck out of every little detail, blow things out of proportion, and often attribute any slight imperfection to something negative or "weird."

I so feel for Michael and why he just wanted to get away from everybody but his children and family. The result? June 25. Fans may love Michael, but they also contribute a great deal to his predicament and isolation. Sometimes a stain is just a stain and needs no explanation.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Grace

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 2864
    • Show only replies by Grace

Re: Why the stains?

  • on: December 14, 2009, 04:29:52 PM
100 % agreed.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Create your day. Create the most astounding year of your life. Be the change you want to see in the world! L.O.V.E.
***********************************************************************************************
"I am tired, I am really tired of manipulation." Michael Jackson, Harlem, New York, NY, July 6, 2002
***********************************************************************************************
******* Let's tear the walls in the brains of this world down.*******

Time to BE.

Offline CC

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 2136
    • Show only replies by CC

Re: Why the stains?

  • on: December 14, 2009, 04:44:03 PM
Quote from: "Lorrie"
Rushka Bergman is a wardrobe stylist; Karen Faye is a makeup artist and hairstylist. The two women specialize in completely different things, and they were probably hired or let go for different, possibly unrelated reasons.

As for the "stains," they just show that Michael is a normal human being who gets stuff on his clothes sometimes because he's not perfect and not focused on insignificant things like that all of the time. He's a busy man and has better things to worry about than a smudge here and a little dust there when he's going about his normal everyday business.

It's easy to see why he didn't want to be photographed and hated interacting with the media. How distressing it must have been to know that no matter how much effort he put into looking presentable and acting decently, people would analyze the heck out of every little detail, blow things out of proportion, and often attribute any slight imperfection to something negative or "weird."

I so feel for Michael and why he just wanted to get away from everybody but his children and family. The result? June 25. Fans may love Michael, but they also contribute a great deal to his predicament and isolation. Sometimes a stain is just a stain and needs no explanation.

thanks lorrie! a stain is just a stain... ;)
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Some men see things as they are and say: WHY?
I dream things that never were and say: WHY NOT?

Offline Ninanina

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 439
    • Show only replies by Ninanina

Re: Why the stains?

  • on: December 14, 2009, 04:45:58 PM
Quote from: "Lorrie"
Rushka Bergman is a wardrobe stylist; Karen Faye is a makeup artist and hairstylist. The two women specialize in completely different things, and they were probably hired or let go for different, possibly unrelated reasons.

As for the "stains," they just show that Michael is a normal human being who gets stuff on his clothes sometimes because he's not perfect and not focused on insignificant things like that all of the time. He's a busy man and has better things to worry about than a smudge here and a little dust there when he's going about his normal everyday business.

It's easy to see why he didn't want to be photographed and hated interacting with the media. How distressing it must have been to know that no matter how much effort he put into looking presentable and acting decently, people would analyze the heck out of every little detail, blow things out of proportion, and often attribute any slight imperfection to something negative or "weird."

I so feel for Michael and why he just wanted to get away from everybody but his children and family. The result? June 25. Fans may love Michael, but they also contribute a great deal to his predicament and isolation. Sometimes a stain is just a stain and needs no explanation.

I understand completely what you'e saying and I agree.

I just noticed those stains only on recent pics and wondered, if they are of any significance.
It absolutely doesn't matter to me, whether Mike wears dirty clothes or not - I do it all the time as I have a 3 yr old daughter, but we're in a hoax forum and everything MAY have some deeper meaning.
So it's not about him - OMG - having a stain on his shirt - this bothers me not at all.
It's the reason for those specific stains, what I was wondering about, but I guess we won't find out anyways.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
________________________________________________________
A revolution without dancing is a revolution not worth having.
________________________________________________________


Offline angelshadow

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 8257
    • Show only replies by angelshadow

Re: Why the stains?

  • on: December 14, 2009, 04:48:58 PM
I already wrote MJ was with the O2 conference fully with these Flecken, zooms the clothes
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline CC

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 2136
    • Show only replies by CC

Re: Why the stains?

  • on: December 14, 2009, 04:52:44 PM
@ ninanina
HI!
I understand your point of view, I understand where we come in ... I also note in TII stains on his pants, always the same, the black pants ... Also note that in part looks like you have ripped the ring and thought so rare alignment, sloppy ... but hey, we all have our days and cons ... if they were only rehearsals, after all ... maybe it's just to make it look more authentic.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Some men see things as they are and say: WHY?
I dream things that never were and say: WHY NOT?

Offline Ninanina

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 439
    • Show only replies by Ninanina

Re: Why the stains?

  • on: December 14, 2009, 04:57:03 PM
Quote from: "angelshadow"
I already wrote MJ was with the O2 conference fully with these Flecken, zooms the clothes

Yes, just not before I posted the topic ;-)

@CC - yes, a stain is a stain and it's probably nothing!
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
________________________________________________________
A revolution without dancing is a revolution not worth having.
________________________________________________________


Offline LiberianGirl

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 341
    • Show only replies by LiberianGirl

Re: Why the stains?

  • on: December 14, 2009, 04:59:22 PM
Quote from: "Lorrie"
Rushka Bergman is a wardrobe stylist; Karen Faye is a makeup artist and hairstylist. The two women specialize in completely different things, and they were probably hired or let go for different, possibly unrelated reasons.

As for the "stains," they just show that Michael is a normal human being who gets stuff on his clothes sometimes because he's not perfect and not focused on insignificant things like that all of the time. He's a busy man and has better things to worry about than a smudge here and a little dust there when he's going about his normal everyday business.

It's easy to see why he didn't want to be photographed and hated interacting with the media. How distressing it must have been to know that no matter how much effort he put into looking presentable and acting decently, people would analyze the heck out of every little detail, blow things out of proportion, and often attribute any slight imperfection to something negative or "weird."

I so feel for Michael and why he just wanted to get away from everybody but his children and family. The result? June 25. Fans may love Michael, but they also contribute a great deal to his predicament and isolation. Sometimes a stain is just a stain and needs no explanation.

Totally agree with you :) And darn he looks HOT!  8-)
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline ILuvUMoreMJ

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 570
    • Show only replies by ILuvUMoreMJ

Re: Why the stains?

  • on: December 16, 2009, 03:41:45 AM
Quote from: "larab"
Quote from: "Harleyblonde"
I hate to say it but dirty stained clothing like these does support the claims of him indeed with a dependacy on drugs etc or something wrong healthwise. Either that or a depressive state which makes you not too worried about certain things regarding your appearance. Beats me why no-one made him aware but then how many people would have dared to be honest with Michael and say "hey Mike, your clothes are dirty!" I don't know about other members but these photo's are quite disturbing to me. I have never in all these years seen MJ in dirty clothing-even when his children were tots- we all know how messy little ones can be but he was never seen or photographed like this.

I agree..

Me too...unfortunately I believe this theory to be more plausible.  It's not just the dirty clothing, but the wigs aren't on perfect like usual either.  And of course I don't think I have to mention how scary skinny he was.  But again, maybe more reason for the hoax.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
I will always love you Michael!

 

Related Topics

  Subject / Started by Replies Last post
17 Replies
1230 Views
Last post December 17, 2009, 04:14:05 AM
by scorpionchik
25 Replies
2428 Views
Last post December 07, 2009, 01:31:41 PM
by Datroot
11 Replies
1034 Views
Last post December 28, 2009, 07:42:25 PM
by Alem (Thetruth)
3 Replies
1200 Views
Last post January 25, 2010, 02:23:22 PM
by MJJ1982
7 Replies
655 Views
Last post February 19, 2010, 06:57:37 PM
by awesome1