0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
8-) This was my first time reading these posts from TS aka S.T.U.D.Y...ROFLMAO!This is hilarious, what a great sense of humour slash sarcasim.QuoteI am amazed at how many on this forum are very convinced of the hoax, and yet have little or no certainty as to when or even if MJ will come back. Hello, knock-knock, is there anybody home? Are you up and out of bed yet??Lets see some more of that. Peace
I am amazed at how many on this forum are very convinced of the hoax, and yet have little or no certainty as to when or even if MJ will come back. Hello, knock-knock, is there anybody home? Are you up and out of bed yet??
I had read them all but it's nice to remember them once again. Thank you for posting ninanina. I do believe and trust TS but even if he is not an insider (which I don't believe), I would thank him many many times because I learned a lot from his posts.[/b] And I don't see a reason for someone to spend such a long time and effort to make those posts. He explained everything in details with reasons and solid proofs. TS is definitely MJ's message. God bless him.
Report this postReply with quoteRe: S.T.U.D.Y. revealedby Serenitys_Dream » Thu Jul 08, 2010 11:02 pm Okay so I went to Tim Simkins website at You are not allowed to view links. Register or Loginand I have read the links there.xxxx wrote:You are not allowed to view links. Register or LoginAn introduction to S.T.U.D.Y - Study To Understand Doctrines YourselfThis pdf of a newsletter and is an introduction to techniques to use when undertaking Bible study. To learn to understand bible scripture on your own without having someone else tell you what the scripture means.xxxx wrote:You are not allowed to view links. Register or LoginAre You: Response-Able? In other words, are you “ready always [able] to give an answer [response]” toquestions about what you believe? Even in secular education, a primary method of testing someone’s knowledge and understanding is through questions (and answers).This pdf is explaining how to answers questions effectively about your beliefs regarding what you have learned through Bible study. How to effectively convey your beliefs to others, how to educate others of the meanings you have discovered through your study of the scriptures in the Bible.xxxx wrote:You are not allowed to view links. Register or LoginThere’s little value examining specific truths, especially areas where there is a difference of belief—until we understand the basic principles that apply to all truths, and the basic principles involved in resolving differences of belief.This pdf is again about addressing different beliefs, what is truth for each individual etc. All of this has to do with bible study and conveying what you have learned from your individual study to others.xxxx wrote:You are not allowed to view links. Register or LoginEspecially from those who are teachers, the “not enough time” plea should never be heard! Are they toobusy teaching the “truth” (so-called), to find out if the teaching really is truth?!? As long as a teacher doesn’thave enough time to answer the questions on a certain subject, he also doesn’t have enough time to teach thatsubject! This principle holds true even in secular teachings—how much more so, in religious teachings!This pdf is addressing issues of teaching about the Bible and conflicts one may have about accepting money for services etc. After reading these newsletters so far I am getting the feeling that Tim Simkins was teaching people how to effectively study the Bible and educate others. Teaching people how to be "Ministers", this does not seem to be a church itself or a cult but an educational tool to educate others about Bible study and become teachers/ministers.xxxx wrote:You are not allowed to view links. Register or LoginThis final newsletter pdf is about how to create wedding videos and the advantages of having a wedding ceremony over getting married in a civil court. This again suggests that these newsletters are being directed towards Ministers and in an effort to help them teach about the bible and subjects important when one is educating a congregation.I also went to the Response-Able website which is linked on the s-t-u-d-y.org page.You are not allowed to view links. Register or LoginThis site is under construction but there is an essay written here.You are not allowed to view links. Register or LoginThis essay is again the information from the newsletters plus a further elaboration on the subjects.Also there has been no further newsletters since 2005 and the above website has not been completed after having been originally created during the time these newsletters were posted. It appears that this idea was not successful has been abandoned or something.My impression from this is that Tim Simkins is promoting an Educational System, tools to help understand the bible and transmit what you believe to others. He also wanted to link up churches that were using this system, no matter the denomination of the congregation, as means of improving and working out unity issues. I am not really understanding why everyone sees this as a cult. There is also no mention of NWO, Illuminati, conspiracy theories, Michael Jackson or anything else that indicates that this is Tim Simkins agenda at all and that he may be responsible for TIAI. TS wrote:Quoted from Update #6:For your information: I am familiar with the STUDY website. Does this mean that it is me, my website? Maybe; or maybe it’s someone I know; or maybe that website was used as a decoy. Regardless of which is the actual case: you are being tested, to see whether you can unbiasedly assess evidence based upon the evidence itself—and not on who the evidence came from, or who you think it came from, etc.Many are failing the test, and they didn’t even know that they were being tested. In fact, there is no better way to test people, than to do it without their knowledge; then people act natural, and don’t try to make themselves into something artificial. Does it make any difference, whether you pass or fail this test? Good question; but I won’t give the answer to that right now.However, I will give another hint on my identity, and the source for my information: so far, I have only seen one discussion that was correct. Should Jacksons tweet about This Is Also It, as some have suggested, so that there will be no doubt? Actually, I already addressed this very question in Update #2 {http://michaeljacksonhoaxforum.com/phpbb2/viewtopic.php?f=72&t=3965}. See also Update 5a, section 5-2, comment about 5-5 redirect: a very similar tweet that was also from Jermaine {http://michaeljacksonhoaxforum.com/phpbb2/viewtopic.php?f=72&t=9726}.What I see here is that TS freely admits that they are aware of this website. It seems to me that they have read the site and are utilizing the same techniques that Tim Simkins has written about but not to educate us on the bible but instead the Hoax. This does not mean that TS is Tim Simkins, it simply means that they read the information on how to approach educating others on a subject and they liked it and are using it to transmit the Hoax information to us.I do not see how any of what I have read on these web pages has proven that TS is fake. This thread has not debunked them in the least.Also let us not forget that Marlon Jackson wrote STUDY peace in the funeral book.And finally, has anyone even tried to contact Tim Simkins and asked him about the S.T.U.D.Y. program and if he has any involvement in TIAI, if they are so skeptical about the "TS" on MJHDI? Isn't it possible that the TS on this forum chose the initials "TS" because they were utilizing Mr. Simkins ideas about education etc in regards to informing us about the hoax? I mean I use Serenitys Dream or SD on this forum as my name, yet it has nothing to do with my actual name.
Thank you for posting Ninanina - It shows TS consistency in his message. "Study to understand Doctrines Yourself" is at the essence of what TS has been taking us through over the last year (or so); we are slowly finding out about the truth through researching it ---> we research, we analyse, we assimilate, we understand.With L.O.V.E
Quote from: "TheRunningGirl"Thank you for posting Ninanina - It shows TS consistency in his message. "Study to understand Doctrines Yourself" is at the essence of what TS has been taking us through over the last year (or so); we are slowly finding out about the truth through researching it ---> we research, we analyse, we assimilate, we understand.With L.O.V.EThis is the signature of Tim Simkin, the one and the same, from the STUDY site which has nothing to do with Michael.
Thanks, S.T.U.D.Y. (no, I’m not MJ)S T U D YToUnderstandDoctrinesYourself
"… the Final Curtain hoax was two years in the making, and involved dozens of co-conspirators. … Numerous talented writers and artists, some of whom prefer to remain anonymous for professional reasons, created an elaborate and convincing nonexistent virtual business under Skaggs’ creative direction."
In the third one there (on 9-9-09), I said "we are going to see" MJ "soon"—I did not say that we would "see" him "today"! Sure, I did leave it open for that possibility: for the sake of the suspense (thrill); but I really did not expect it
We should also ask what day would be the "resurrection", according to the plan, if not 9-9-09? The original Thriller made all-time records in both the album, and the music video. {click here; also click here, and click here} Well then, in the Thriller 2 movie (TII), surely MJ would not forget to include scenes of the dead coming to life (just like in the original Thriller)—especially since this is the ultimate in the "dead" coming back to life (MJ himself).
I think it's very possible what you said, Patty! But I was thinking about something. 1. TS said he's not MJ. 2. Front has never said he's not MJ. 3. Most of us here agree that they are either the same person or two different people working on the same team - Team MJ. /woohoo/4. So, based on what TS has said ("I'm not MJ") and based on what Front HASN'T said -- well, are you thinking what I'm thinking? :lol: