0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Scorpionchick, I do find it strange. As I stated above, it makes no sense for the nonbelievers. No matter how I take it, from a nonbeliever point of view it makes no sense what she said.
You are not allowed to view links. Register or LoginLet's take the version she addresses the large public (non-believers) what logic does this have? Read between the lines for what? If it's the truth, what RBTL she asks for? Or, if they say lies in court, again, why RBTL? If they are lies, you simply treat them as lies. There's no truth in a lie. It simply has no logic.1. truth is truth, you don't have to RBTL when the truth is said.2. lies are lies and there's nothing to RBTL in a lie. If for example the prosecution argues that Michael killed himself/drank propofol- what can you read between the lines as large public (non-believers)? That's a lie, and nothing to read between the lines. I agree with you and don't see anything 'WOW' in La Toya's tweet.
Let's take the version she addresses the large public (non-believers) what logic does this have? Read between the lines for what? If it's the truth, what RBTL she asks for? Or, if they say lies in court, again, why RBTL? If they are lies, you simply treat them as lies. There's no truth in a lie. It simply has no logic.1. truth is truth, you don't have to RBTL when the truth is said.2. lies are lies and there's nothing to RBTL in a lie. If for example the prosecution argues that Michael killed himself/drank propofol- what can you read between the lines as large public (non-believers)? That's a lie, and nothing to read between the lines.
About reading between the lines or lies (or RBTL© lolol/) I think that at this point in time in the Hoax no tweets from La Toya or any other member of the family will be enough alone to convince any non-beLIEver (of course there are still miracles)...look how hard it was to admit the connections with the Family and Front for believers in comparison. People who followed the hoax since a long time now/or beLIEvers are the ones to understand and grasp the subtlety found in those tweets. They can only be interpreted correctly when seen from the right perspective. The tweets are not the basis for belief but rather nudges, and help us keep the faith until the end. IMO. So I agree with PureLove.
You are not allowed to view links. Register or LoginAbout reading between the lines or lies (or RBTL© lolol/ ) I think that at this point in time in the Hoax no tweets from La Toya or any other member of the family will be enough alone to convince any non-beLIEver (of course there are still miracles)...look how hard it was to admit the connections with the Family and Front for believers in comparison. People who followed the hoax since a long time now/or beLIEvers are the ones to understand and grasp the subtlety found in those tweets. They can only be interpreted correctly when seen from the right perspective. The tweets are not the basis for belief but rather nudges, and help us keep the faith until the end. IMO. So I agree with PureLove.What is the connection between them???
About reading between the lines or lies (or RBTL© lolol/ ) I think that at this point in time in the Hoax no tweets from La Toya or any other member of the family will be enough alone to convince any non-beLIEver (of course there are still miracles)...look how hard it was to admit the connections with the Family and Front for believers in comparison. People who followed the hoax since a long time now/or beLIEvers are the ones to understand and grasp the subtlety found in those tweets. They can only be interpreted correctly when seen from the right perspective. The tweets are not the basis for belief but rather nudges, and help us keep the faith until the end. IMO. So I agree with PureLove.
You are not allowed to view links. Register or LoginYou are not allowed to view links. Register or LoginLet's take the version she addresses the large public (non-believers) what logic does this have? Read between the lines for what? If it's the truth, what RBTL she asks for? Or, if they say lies in court, again, why RBTL? If they are lies, you simply treat them as lies. There's no truth in a lie. It simply has no logic.1. truth is truth, you don't have to RBTL when the truth is said.2. lies are lies and there's nothing to RBTL in a lie. If for example the prosecution argues that Michael killed himself/drank propofol- what can you read between the lines as large public (non-believers)? That's a lie, and nothing to read between the lines. I agree with you and don't see anything 'WOW' in La Toya's tweet. You are not allowed to view links. Register or LoginScorpionchick, I do find it strange. As I stated above, it makes no sense for the nonbelievers. No matter how I take it, from a nonbeliever point of view it makes no sense what she said.Read btw the lines by Latoya was directed at US, believers. It's not about non-believers. There're so many lies hidden BTW the truths and there're so many truths hidden BTW the lies in this hoax. That is the reason why we are always told to read btw the lines by the family. Marlon wrote the same if you guys remember it. They are trying to say that, 'the truth is not what it seems. It looks like Michael is dead and even us are saying he is dead but that is not the truth, try to catch the hidden clues we're giving in the lines. That is the reason why we're asking you to read btw the lines.' This is what we are supposed to do and actually doing during the past 2 years. We're reading btw the lines and that is the reason why we found out about the hoax. We know a truth is not the truth and a lie is not a lie in this hoax and in life actually. And Latoya is the second family member who used the same line "read btw the lines" and some others used "connect the dots" which is all a WOW for me.
I hate latoya, she's such a hypocrite. she couldn't care less about michael when he was "alive", and since he "died" she became the perfect sister. just crying out for attention if you ask me.