0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Here´s a repost of the post with the pictures:Posted by: GraceWell IMO there have always been 2. Double or brother I cannot judge and it's not important.The nose could have been remade to anybody by A. Klein. The eyes form, the distances between lips, nose and eyebrows and to cheek bones make the differences IMO.There is a Michael with doe's eyes:(or as Souza and Mo said "asiatic" eyes)and there is a Michael "handsome" with the more square chin (we know him from the angel pics and together with MLP)And no, this did not happen within 8 months of recording - they were there all the time until June 2009:
Quote from: "*Mo*"Here´s a repost of the post with the pictures:Posted by: GraceWell IMO there have always been 2. Double or brother I cannot judge and it's not important.The nose could have been remade to anybody by A. Klein. The eyes form, the distances between lips, nose and eyebrows and to cheek bones make the differences IMO.There is a Michael with doe's eyes:(or as Souza and Mo said "asiatic" eyes)and there is a Michael "handsome" with the more square chin (we know him from the angel pics and together with MLP)am i wrong to believe "handsome" michael is the "real" michael?
Here´s a repost of the post with the pictures:Posted by: GraceWell IMO there have always been 2. Double or brother I cannot judge and it's not important.The nose could have been remade to anybody by A. Klein. The eyes form, the distances between lips, nose and eyebrows and to cheek bones make the differences IMO.There is a Michael with doe's eyes:(or as Souza and Mo said "asiatic" eyes)and there is a Michael "handsome" with the more square chin (we know him from the angel pics and together with MLP)am i wrong to believe "handsome" michael is the "real" michael?
Just like I've said on the old forum, I think it's Michael all the time
Don't you think that if MJ had 3 doubles in the Bashir documentary, he and his attorneys would have said so in his trial when the prosecutors played the whole darn thing as evidence against him? Don't you think his lawyers would have used it as proof of innocence? They would have said the dude holding Gavin's hand was a double Please...the extra two MJ's would have been witnesses at the trial...or do you think MJ would possibly give up his freedom, if convicted, to hold on to a twisted secret like that? GOOD GREIF CHARLIE BROWN!This post is written with L.O.V.E. and good intentions.PS...about his inconsistencies in his "story telling" in the interviews...MJ is known for telling little white lies and getting caught in the act. This is why it's so dang hard to believe him when he is telling the truth! Take the cookies, bedtime stories and warm milk story he tells about Gavin and other kids...give me a break, if you read what any of the boys say about MJ (the ones who were for him) and sleeping in his bed, there were no cozy fires and milk and cookies and bedtime stories! It was movies, video games, clowning around, french fries, soda, popcorn...things kids that age enjoy. MJ likes to tell stories especially when it comes to stories that are really no ones business...like the origins of Blanket's mother. I just wish he said she was a Fairy who is a distant relative to Tinkerbelle.
Quote from: "mjfansince4"Quote from: "*Mo*"Here´s a repost of the post with the pictures:Posted by: GraceWell IMO there have always been 2. Double or brother I cannot judge and it's not important.The nose could have been remade to anybody by A. Klein. The eyes form, the distances between lips, nose and eyebrows and to cheek bones make the differences IMO.There is a Michael with doe's eyes:(or as Souza and Mo said "asiatic" eyes)and there is a Michael "handsome" with the more square chin (we know him from the angel pics and together with MLP)am i wrong to believe "handsome" michael is the "real" michael?Am not saying that there's absolutely no way he could have decoys and doubles, but the difference in the way he looks in the photos above are due to better, more subtle make up, lighting and different hair cut. The second photo he doesn't have lipstick and the lighting is softer. Also in the second photo, he has a shorter hair cut/ hair piece that frames his face and gives him a more sculpted masculine look. The first haircut was all one length (shoulder length) and partially covering his jawline, so you couldn't see his bone structure.However, I do admit he was acting very differently. In the first interview segment he was flighty almost whimsical, while in the last interview segment he was subdued and aggressive at times. i think the reason for this is that he realized Bashir was manipulating him.
The first two pictures should not be compared to look for doubles. As someone posted,one is in makeup. Makeup can change the depth and shape of your eyes, that is why they give you the little guides on the backs of shadows packs. One way will make your eyes bigger, one will make your eyes smaller, younger, older, brighter, duller etc. Base for the face even changes the appearance of the shape of the face. If it didn't, us older ladies wouldn't bother with the BOTAFIRM or Revitalift.I think, without a doubt, Michael used doubles for things (there was a media special about it and not one of those bad media specials either), but these photos should never be compared for that. Makeup and lighting make a 100% difference.I would post my pictures makeup and none.. then you could really see two different people but I don't want to scare anybody today.. :lol:
Quote from: "*Mo*"Here´s a repost of the post with the pictures:Posted by: GraceWell IMO there have always been 2. Double or brother I cannot judge and it's not important.The nose could have been remade to anybody by A. Klein. The eyes form, the distances between lips, nose and eyebrows and to cheek bones make the differences IMO.There is a Michael with doe's eyes:(or as Souza and Mo said "asiatic" eyes)and there is a Michael "handsome" with the more square chin (we know him from the angel pics and together with MLP)And no, this did not happen within 8 months of recording - they were there all the time until June 2009:But remember Bashir said Michael flew in a lighting expert for that 2nd photo's interview so that could possibly be why he looks different. Unless, Bashir is lying of course.
MJJ1982 wrote:Just like I've said on the old forum, I think it's Michael all the time AGREED! 100% MJ ALL THE TIMEAgree too,to me it's all Michael.
Started by supermj4eva Hoax Videos
Started by thenutcrackersuite Other Odd Things
Started by *Mo* Hoax Videos
Started by the arabian nights The Funeral, The Body & Forest Lawn
Started by Steph16 Other Odd Things